Lord Duckhunter

Treat all immigrants equally, do not discriminate against African, Indian and Asian people . How is placing restrictions on Indian engineers but not on Romanian labourers logical . Allow selective education . How is allowing any Tom **** or Harry to set up a school and how is allowing religion to play a part in entrance policy but not intelligance logical ? Cut foreign aid . Why is giving aid to India , which has a space programme , whilst our pensioners choose between heating and eating and thousands use food banks logical? Scrap HS2. How is cutting a few minutes off journeys to the midlands , whilst the rest of the system needs investment logical?

At least we now know you're not a bloke. You must be either a lesbo, Greenham Common 6 Pinter or a German , which one is it?

Lucas is another privately educated career politician .

European football would help players like JWP and Harrison Reed in their development . It's not very often that we've qualified for Europe via our league position , so it'll be a great effort considering the summer we had. Of course it will effect our league position next season and we risk doing an Everton , but it's worth it IMO . Let's face facts , a freak season this year MAY get us a shot at top 4 but realistically our only hope of ever gaining champions league football is winning the Europa league and you have to be in it to win it. Why on earth would anyone not want to qualify for it. I really hope Everton win it this year and qualify for the big one as maybe then English teams will start taking the competition seriously . It would be great if they did so and Liverpool and spurs miss out after not taking the Europa league as seriously as Everton seem to have done . It's not the champions league but it's a damn good experience for a club like ours .

Why's it a shame she has a nice pair, surely its a good thing. She'll have more men to choose from, get more attention and it'll help her get on in life. Never underestimate what a decent pair of tits can do for a girl.

Tony Blair was the first pm I remember answering an opposition question by asking a question. Michael Howard used to point out it was Prime Ministers questions , not opposition leaders questions. William Hague was a great performer who used to mock Blair regularly ( in fact I did read it was one of the reason Blair cut it from twice to once a week) , but it didn't do him any good out in the country. Not enough people watch it to really affect elections and all they're trying to do is get a line on news at ten. Its not a debate or a question and answer session , its a series of sound bites chucked at each other.

Coincidence that Cameron is running our armed forces down with cuts ? I don't think so, he's the biggest europhile Tory since Grocer Heath .

I've worked for women bosses and on the whole they're right *****es. They are particularly bullying towards other women. The best boss I ever had was a women, but she soon put all the other chicks in place. I put it down to her being a dozen Pinter , but she did more to stop other chicks' careers than any bloke would have done. I got on great with her , but if she didnt rate you, you were toast very quicvkly.She's way up the food chain now in a senior position ,but a man wouldn't have got away with half she did.

Here's a few home truths about Boscombe. They are following exactly the same business model that was so sucsessful for the fishy few. They call us scum and have zero respect for us . They love Arry and Howe is a skate . I hope they fail miserably and go back to where they belong .

Rubbish, where has anyone said their servants to men . What on earth is wrong with being an object of sexual desire anyway ? I'd be flattered if any bird considered me like that .

Nonsense . Any politician has the right to refuse a TV debate . Some Politicians refused to do QT with Nick Griffin , was that wrong . We are not talking about a politician refusing to discuss his policies , but one refusing to do so in a particular forum .

I consider myself a feminist , I love and admire chicks. It's 6 pinters like Harriet Harman and other wimmin types that give feminists a bad name .

I think it's great that we've allowed the pretty little things a special day .

I don't believe the SNP will form any sort of coalition with Labour. Their whole strategy is that anything good is down to them in the devolved parliament and anything bad is from Westminster. If they have the ability to influence Westminster and vote things down , eventually this approach will fail as they can't really complain about things they could block. Their ideal scenario is clearly another Tory government but a labour majority

The quickest way to stop blokes singing " get your tits out for the lads" is to get them out.

Rachel Reeves did exactly the same thing on QT. She was banging on about how she " only" worked for her voters , until Dimble pointed out she had written a book, for which she was paid . She claimed that " didn't count" as a second job.

The Tories have made a political calculation that avoiding a debate will give them some political grief now, but are willing to put up with that to close down the debates. Its not a question of being scared , but of strategy . Milliband will go into the debates as a loser, they don't want to take the chance of people thinking he's not as bad as they thought. Cameron could still win any debate , but milliband get the boost by just appearing " normal" . They want the British people to think its unthinkable that Ed could become prime minister but by debating him head to head you're actually elevating him to prime minister material. Portillo had a theory on " This Week" last night. He claims Ed is poor when interviewed by political journo 's like Boulton or Neil . If there's no debates he'll have to get his face on TV with these interviewers more. If there is a debate it'll take over that role, and get him into voters living rooms ,without facing interviews thst he always comes over poorly in.

I don't share your politics Pap , but you are spot on here . Nail on head .

IMO unskilled wages are kept low by too much supply and government subsidies . Why on earth will anyone pay unskilled labour anymore when government will top low wages up and immigration will ensure the supply . Nobody is blaming immigrants , however you have to face the fact that they affect wages. Now you could think having immigrants keeping wage levels down is a good thing as it boosts the economy and helps business profits . That's fine and a legitimate argument , just don't call people who disagree with you racists or little englanders . The more immigrants prepared to work for low wages will have a direct effect on the amount employers are willing to pay

I thought Forster's time wasting was horrendous in the last few mins last night. Really surprised Palace didn't make more of a fuss. It obviously didn't last as long as Fosters , but then we weren't in the lead as long. I presume the moaners on here were upset about it, or is our time wasting OK?

The problem is that the free movement of people is a fundamental part of the EU. " One of the corner stones of " ever closer union " is that movement of people is the same as we have in the UK. We can not limit the number of jocks that want to move to England and they want Belgium's, Greeks , and Dutch afforded the same rights. You're looking at it as a Trading Bloc , whereas in reality the establishment want a federal country. Texans don't limit the amount of Floridians that can work there and that's their ultimate goal , a united states of Europe.

You have to ask yourself why Bob Crow and Tony Benn were against the EU. It wasn't that they blamed immigrants or that they were swivel eyed right wing loons. They understood that unlimited immigration from EU countries affected the working man's pay and conditions. All the unskilled working age man has to negotiate with is the withdrawal of his labour. Not in the " strike" sense , but in the " I'm not doing that for that pay" sense. Once you allow immigrants to fill that gap, there's no need for the market to adjust and pay more , there is more supply than demand, but it is an artificial supply. Supply and demand runs the capitalist system, but at the moment its skewed in favour of business. They are not subjected to the free market labour rules because there's too much supply.

Why don't you answer the question ?

So how's it going to change when you're relying on government and goodwill of the employee to change it . When immigrants are willing to put up with all that , in return for living in this great country , it'll never change .

No, but what you can do is address the issue that stop people doing so . You may need to pay more, change the " culture" of the industry , change the terms and conditions or hours . Address any training needs , or funding . However , if you can import people willing to put up with it all , what's the incentive to change ?