Lord Duckhunter

**** me , I'd wish I'd known this , I might have been tempted to sign on with the god botherers , what's it say about drinking ?

She's really not.

Well, that's 90 mins of my life I'll never get back. I can't work out what's worse. The " expert" Michael Owen , who makes Dave merrington appear insightful, the atmosphere or Sunderland's performance. **** sake AFC Wimbledon gave them a better game.

Half time substitute on to straighten Sunderland,

I honestly think they're as bad today as the 8-0 . They should be 4 down.

Sunderland are shocking

There's a hell of a lot wrong with the BBC , starting with the TV poll tax that funds it and the locking up of people who refuse to pay . However , getting the weather wrong or sending reporters to report on terrorist atrocities in Paris is not amongst them .The Cliff Richard thing annoyed me because of the pious attitude the BBC would have taken had "The Sun " or "The Daily Mail" colluded with the police, but being consistent has never been high on the bbc 's agenda .

CNN reporting one gunman got away. **** will hit fan if true

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zKwCZnCW0A http://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2015/01/bbc-restrictions-on-depicting-mohammed-must-be-abolished-says-nss1

Sky reporting another incident now.

Also depends on what she looks like. If Tim woke up to find a real hottie giving him a bj , he'd call that lucky. If she had been beaten by the ugly stick he'd call it something else.

If terrorism and threats don't work ( as our great and good politicians claim) then why do the BBC editorial guidelines state that " the prophet Mohammed must not be represented in any shape or form" ?

He did. Seeing as Charlie Webster resigned over Evans training with Sheffield Utd, I found her tweet about Mike Tyson a bit strange. Perhaps she didn't know Mikey was a rapist, or maybe she's a hypocrite.

Why are people bending over backwards to try and claim the Muslim religion is somehow equatable with Christianity . I'm not a Christian man , but it's clear that certain aspects of Muslim opinion is at odds with our society . If you asked " should women be allowed to behave exactly the same as men, be allowed to marry who they want and wear what they want " mainstream British opinion , excluding Muslims would probarly agree except for the odd fruit cake , would the same % of Muslims agree ?

How on earth is that representative of mainstream Muslim opinion ? Had I posted a couple of people condoning attacks on infidels , you'll rightly say it's unrepresentative . What do you think mainstream Muslim opinion is regarding women's rights , gay rights and the right to laugh at or criticise the prophet . Is it as enlightened as the majority of the country?

How does your " middle class Western Islam " view women and gay rights and do they uphold the right of others to take the pizz or criticise their religion .

Surely this particular incident is about imposing some sort of Islamic blasphemy law via the back door. I don't think Muslim or Muslim communities should be forced to condemn this , as it goes without saying . However , I would be interested in their views on whether the pizz can be taken out of their religion .

France wasn't involved or support the invasion of Iraq, yet still get attacked.

The thing is , there is no professional body that can refuse to allow him to be a footballer. I couldn't start suddenly being an accountant or a solicitor tomorrow regardless of whether somebody wanted to employ me as one. I could become a " professional" footballer. If les Reed knocked on my front door with a playing contract in hand , there is no law or no governing body to say " he's not qualified enough" . If the contract was for finance director , there would be. Not one person who calls for a ban seems to be able to articulate how it will work in practical terms. Who issues the ban? Is it from all football and if not, who decides at what level a ban kicks in? What happens if your at a non banned level and your team get promoted to a banned level or draw a banned level team in the cup? Are you allowed to make a living out of football at a banned level. What happens if you're a rapist playing for a Wessex League team and become a Charlie Austin, do you become banned because Swindon want to sign you?

The point I'm trying to make is that a ban isn't as easy to administer as people think. The only way to do it would be for the FA to bring in a blanket ban for all sex offenders , as every league and every team are governed by the FA. However, any ban would have to cover all sex offenders jailed not just Evans. Do people really want to stop ex offenders , many of whom maybe rehabilitated , playing organised football at any level? Once people start saying they don't want people earning loads of money, or playing in front of thousands , it becomes subjective , how much can they earn ect . You can't ban someone from playing football on the basis their good at it. If it's wrong for Evans to play football , it wrong, whether he plays for the Red Lion on a Sunday morning or Manchester Utd. You can't make rules and laws on the back of one particular case , no matter how unpleasant . Ex offenders should either be allowed to play football or they should not, you can't say some can and some can't , depending on how famous they are or how much they might earn from it .

What have the PFA got to do with stopping him playing football, its a union . Football is not a closed shop , whether or not the PFA refuse to admit him as a member doesn't make a blind bit of difference . He can still play football whether member or not. How do you stop someone being a " pro" footballer . You don't need a licence or professional qualification , all you need is someone willing to pay you. Technically my local pub team could pay him 1k a week and he'd be a professional.

Because PFA is just a union, even if they stripped him of membership he could still play football . Its not a closed shop, you don't need to be a union member to play football. Football is a pyramid, how far down do you want to go to ban him. The " professional" game is blurred. There are professional players in non league. If you allow him to play non league, what happens if his team get promoted , do they have to sell him. What if they draw a league club in the cup, can he play. Or do you intend to ban him from all football , including the Dog and Duck? Setting the criteria of any ban is impossible when teams move up and down the leagues , pay players, and charge spectators to watch right down the pyramid.

One for the oldies , Sgt Bilko , what a great show. My father in law owned a night club in the 70' s and meet Phil Shilvers once , said he was a nice fella. As for women, I don't find any particularly funny, Jo Brand , Saunders and dawn French unbelievably unfunny . Never got that Ab Fab thing and found it utter pony. The royal family was great, very funny and well written , but became too predictable in the end. The last couple of Xmas specials were embarrassing IMO. Talking of Royal Family , the show Early Doors was similar and I loved that , thought it was well funny. I love The Carry On films as well . Carry on Screaming with Harry H Corbett a particular favourite. No doubt some of the metrosexuals on here will disapprove , but I thought they were great .

Job shy layabout from a dysfunctional family . Not really surprised the mail are going hard on this , immigrant family who are welfare claimants , none of whom can seem to stop ****ging, make good copy.

Wes makes a good point there. Don't lie, but don't mention anything about the match .