Lord Duckhunter

They really have some ****ing idiots amongst their support. This was posted on another forum. "We have some fantastic trialists at the club atm, I would be ecstatic if we could sign them all + make up the rest of the squad with accademy players. McLeod (22 league goals last year) and Luke Rodgers (100+ goals in 300 fl appearences) upfront, Gillet and Lloyd Sam on the wings, Brian Howard and Ashley Harris in CM, Harley at left back, Magri and Webster at CB, and Dumbuya at right fall back/right wing back... MINUS 10, WHO GIVES A ****, WE'RE SUPER POMPEY, AND WE'RE GOING UP! It may not even be -10 , but both Scum and Leeds have proved that it's possible to up near the top after a deduction". I dont know if this has been posted, but here's the run down on their trialists. http://pompeypages.com/2012/07/16/the-full-low-down-on-pompeys-trialists/ I love this bit; "With over 300 appearances in the Football League and over 100 goals to his name, the 30-year-old Englishman, who is a former strike-partner of Thierry Henry, is a proven goalscorer and could front Pompey’s strike-force next season if the trial goes well.Although Rodgers has a slightly dodgy past, with a criminal record for hitting a 16-year-old girl with a firework, causing a disturbance in Nottingham city centre after a night out with his Notts County team-mates, and assaulting Hartlepool defender Chris Westwood"

i dont see much differance between kill the pompey scum and what they sing to each other . Or what about the german bomber song so beloved by english supporters . 20 odd years ago i was up north on king billys day and watched the parade , the pubs were open all day (this was before all day opening ) and they were packed with orange men . They were playing their flutes and drums ect and singing their songs in the pubs , all the songs were obviously offensive and about slaughtering catholics ,but i dont think many of them meant anything by it , it was just a **** up . I got talking to a bar man and he was a catholic , his take on it was , they have filled my till they can sing what they like . I dont think any of them really wanted to kill anyone as it would have interfered with their singing and drinking and it was certainly a memorable and enjoyable day and night for me . I have heard some pretty bad things at football over the years but most stuff is just banter

"TOO FAR and too fast" is a meaningless Labour slogan. Andrew Neil monstered Rachel Reeves over this on The Daily Politics. His question "if 1.5% of GDP is too far, what is the right %." All she did was waffle and bluster. He also pointed out that if they acceptted cuts were necessary, why have they oppossed every cut so far in this parliament including cuts to family benefit for millionaires.

I couldn't give a monkeys whether DD was in the TA, SAS, SBS or Boy Scouts. He talks more sense than those upper class private educated *** ts Cameron, Osborne, Balls and Milliband. Him and AJ should be leading the 2 parties imo, and the sandal wearers should have Tim Farron.

Contrast Aly McCoist's statement just released with clowns like Appy, Clotterill, Birch, Grant and other assorted bell ringers. "I fully accept the decision of the SFL today and thank them for allowing us into the SFL. "Clearly, starting again from the bottom league is not ideal and makes the task of rebuilding Rangers a longer one but the SFL was placed in an impossible situation and I respect its decision. "I fully supported the fans views that starting again in Division 3 maintains the sporting integrity that the SPL clubs were so keen on." ****ing hell, there's not one Skate who could match the dignity of McCoist.

Anybody who doesn't think we need deep spending cuts is living in cloud cuckoo. Our present spending levels are unsustainable. Not one of our major parties is being honest and the public are not prepared to accept any cuts in living standards despite the obvious hole we're in. We are just passing the debt down to future generations. Government spending is 50% higher in real terms than it was 10 years ago, the cut in expenditure in 2011-12 is just 1.5% of GDP. I read an article that chilled me to the bone. Our debt is at about 75 per cent of GDP. But if public sector pension liabilities are included, the private finance initiative is included and the guarantees given to the banking sector were ever called upon, it would rise to more than 240 per cent. It's Skate economics. Our political leaders are the Peter Storrie's, never telling us the truth and and carrying on spending someone elses money (ours).And the public are the Blue Few, putting our head in the sand and trying to convince ourselves that it really is sustainable.

The exit without a CVA was the vehicle used to punish Leeds -15. Boscombe got -15 for that and an extra 2 for multiple admins. It makes the Skates punishment seem very very lenient, for what is basically the same offense. It seems that having a CVA, but not paying it gets you a 5 point deduction over not having one, and past admins are not taken into account.

You posted that the Mail was for Hitler AGAINST our country, where is your proof of that, because the above isn't it.

I look forward to seeing your proof of the Mail's support of Hitler AGAINST our Country.

How does that work with drug dealers, surely they show no income but are loaded.

If you are going to call people moron's I suggest you use correct English when doing so. Otherwise you'll just look like a knob "mouthpeace "(sic) from the illiterate left. I dont normally pull people up over their English (as mine is poor) but someone calling others "morons" is fair game.

That's why the Lib/Dem proposals wont address the issue. Archer, Ashcroft and the rest of them, will be at the top of the party lists. You'll go into the booth to vote and end up with Ashcroft ect getting an electoral madate, and for 15 bloody years. 15 year terms maybe ok for Mugabe and his placemen, but surely a democratic country like ours should be above that.

I can see Dune's arguement even if I disagree with it. I can see Vebal's arguement, which I agree with. What I cant get my head round is Paddy Pantsdown and the rest of the tree huggers arguement that nobody should be involved with our consituation on the basis of who their father is, yet still want to retain Queenie. This strange position is also compounded by adding nobody should be involved on the basis of who they are friends with, and then call for a Party list system. If this is a "once in a lifetime" chance to make a real change then let's do it right.

It's really democractic because the idiots on the party list will stay there for 15 years, whereas at present the idiots stay there for life. The lib dems seem to want to pick and choose what parts of the constituation they think are fair, and which ones aren't. I'm against any part of our constituation being based on heredity principles, not just some of it.

If we follow the Lib/Dems reforms, we would end up with more and more Warsi's. Not only would the party lists be full of bootlicking professional politicans, but they would all tow the party line. At least the hereditary's didn't owe their position to any party leader and were also not professional politicans. Admittedly some of them were barking mad, but some of them were independant thinkers. I personally dont think that you can have a party list system and then expect the House of Lords to work as a check to the Commons. It will be stuffed full of placemen and women. As for another point made on here; It does make me laugh how the "right on" Labour and Lib/Dem parties, who are so much more progressive than the male dominated Torys, are still no nearer to a women leader than they were 35 years ago, when a women , Maggie Thatcher became Tory leader.

The other thing with S/T waiting list is it puts pressure on the Council/ local autherity when it comes to moving or expanding. My mate is a Spurs supporter and they have a system where tickets go on sale to people on the S/T waiting list first. He reckons this encourages people to go onto the waiting list even if they have no intention of ever getting a S/T. Spurs know this, but can pressure the council by saying we have x thousend on the waiting list. It may help smooth any difficulties with the council and really show how much a new ground is needed.

The problem with bad laws getting through is too much whipping and too many members of the Government. Once you take into account all the pps' and other assorted Govt jobs, and also the strong arm tactics of the whips, there aren't enough independantly minded MP's to block bad legislation.

The last time I listened to Radio 1 in the morning, I think the hairy Arsenal...I mean Cornflake, who was on. Would listen to Nicky Campbell and Whispering Bob in the evening, but once they shafted Bob I stopped listening.

The 2 week timetable was put in to stop opposition Filibustering and the Commons getting bogged down with endless amendments and votes.

At the moment anyone who wants a S/T can get one. Once we start getting a few thousend on a waiting list things might start to move in that direction.

This was my point. Paddy Pantsdown was complaining that the make up of the Lords was based on who you know or who your father was. An elected Lords based on his chosen method would also be based on who you know. Instead of just appointing their "friends" they would just put them at the top of the party list. As for "who your father was", I think Queenie may have reached the Head of State that way. The Lib/Dem position is this; an elected Lords, but from a party list system. Eventual removal of any herditary principle, apart from the head of state, no referendum on the changes, and The Commons only gets 2 weeks only to debate it.That's why it'll get chucked out, it's a shiete ill thought out bill, worked out on the back of a fag packet and used as part of a grubby little deal between coalition partners.It's no way to go about reform of our consituation.

I'm all for Lord's reform but this was a dog's breakfast of a bill. 15 year terms, AV and party list system is hardly democratic and will do nothing to change the Lords. I heard that boring bufoon Paddy Pantsdown on the BBC waffling on (using 5 words when 1 would do) on how it was a point of principle that in a modern democracy nobody should have a role on the basis of family history or who they know . Perhaps he thinks Queenie was elected. He went on to make the claim that the poll tax and the Iraq war would have been stopped if there was an elected Lords. This dispite claiming that an elected Lords would not be a threat to the Commons and that the will of the commons would always prevail. He geniunely seemed to think he could, in the same arguement, claim that the Iraq war would have not happened, but that the Commons would be able to force laws through as they do at present.With chumps like Pantsdown in the Lords there is a real need for reform, but this bill would give us even more Pantsdown's than we have now.So it's a no from me.

There was a bloke on Talksport last night, was some sort of expert on Scots football and Rangers. He said that it was the Scottish FA doing what they do best and sitting on the fence, said that they cant make a decision so have handed it to FIFA. Went on to add that his understanding was that the players were on very firm ground and that the only people who he'd spoken to that belived that Rangers had a case were Rangers themselves.

Has anyone been down there today either to buy or to collect. I have to go and collect my Nipper's as it's a consession and I'm off tomorrow, I'm a bit pushed for time and dont want to be waiting around for ages.

+1.......