benjii

When the laughter stops the discipline has to begin.

You can't cure a hangover other than with time. HTH.

It's pretty irrational to be scared of spiders.

------------------------KD---------------------- DB-----------Fonteh--------Martin----------Harding Puncheon-----Hammond---Spider------------Dickson ----------------------Guly------------------------ ---------------------Barnard-----------------------

Exactly. And the bit in bold confirms exactly why we should not be castigated for departing from what might be perceived as "best practice" purely because a lot of other clubs do things differently. Following that logic, anything a cartel or a monopoly decides to do is "best practice". Utter nonsense. Custom and inertia do not equate to best practice.

Oh dear. Talk about twisting facts to suit your own misanthropic tendencies.

Exactly right and yet some numpties call us "unprofessional" or "petty". Who's the gob****e with the motor mouth that has caused the whole chain of events?

Just changed the way I would have changed. Although I would probably have left Barney on instead of Lambert.

Ffs

Yeah, Saturday was match better and the Yeovil commentary earlier was better too.

4 pts off play-offs and 7 off top. FWIW, which is not a lot at the moment.

I wish this commentator would give the casual racism a rest. "He's black therefore he doesn't like rain".

Goooolllliiiieeee!!!!!!!!!!!

Jaidi - I want to cover you in kisses you darling man.

For those who were wondering... I have deliberated and concluded that Butterfield is indeed our best right back since we were in the Premier League.

Jon Stead - legend.

That would be good. I'm trying to remember who our right back was during the play-off season so I can consider making the bold claim that Butterfield is the best RB we've had since we were in the Prem.

Class defending by Butterfield. He's been an excellent signing - much better than what we've had at right back for years.

Schneiderlin being a tosser, yet again.

Frustrating, sounds like every time we've had a good chance someone has fallen over.

you clueless tool.

I can't be arsed to read it again but from the skim I did the other day, I don't think Gaydamak is claiming to be a secured creditor in respect of his ~£30m. He is, I think, claiming subrogated rights of security. This relates to the charges which the bank has over the club but in respect of which the liabilities have been satisfied. If I recall correctly, he claimed that he personally paid off the overdraft to [barclays?] - I suspect his claim relates to subrogated rights in respect of that payment only, which I think was circa £3-4m, rather than £30m. I'm not sure if the claim would have had a bearing on voting entitlements under the CVA though.

Sounds like we've got a decent ref for once.

Yeovil only - might be more interesting actually.

When was the last time the majority of eligible people voted for the PM? Probably never.