Dark Munster

https://www.saintsweb.co.uk/topic/54858-claude-puel/ Anyway, back to Ralph ...

We could well be safe by the time our match starts. Or if not, Liverpool could be out of it (dropping points against Villa, with City winning 2 out of 2), and not care about our result, yet alone goal difference. I think the only case where Liverpool would want to give us a good Rogering is if they and City win their next matches before playing us (Liverpool one match, City two). Then Liverpool would be 6 points behind City, and would need to beat us by a big enough margin to get close to City's goal difference, and then hope that City lose their last match and they win theirs. Even in that worst case scenario Liverpool would probably only need to beat us by at most 5 or 6, and win their last match by one goal.

I'm going to stick my neck out and predict the head to head and matchday results will be identical at the end of the season!

Is it the same one where our players currently are? If so, give them my regards tell them to f**k off.

I just Googled it: Denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity.

They can ask for whatever they want. But at the end of the day the selling price is what the seller and buyer agree to, and the buyer won't be willing to pay more because of a sell-on clause. Also a seller will hold out for as much as possible*, regardless whether there is a sell-on clause or not. * Except when Saints sold Mane.

Normally, of course. But not when they're betting on their own team's relegation. That's what many of them say, anyway.

"Hold my beer ..."

I wouldn't do it, (because I don't like losing money), but I'm guessing that any self respecting Saints fan betting on us getting relegated is hoping to lose his/her money, and just doing it as an insurance bet to soften the blow if the unlikely happens.

That's what the Blue Phew believe to this day, but we actually finished bottom by losing to Utd, so even if WBA had lost against the Skates and gone down we still would've gone down.

Probably true. But since Broja is probably off, we need to find a new Tadic and an Ings. I've said many times that a goal-scoring forward lifts the whole team. We've been shit since Broja went off the boil, there is no one else in the squad who can find the back of the net regularly. If we'd had Ings this season (and at his peak, not injured) we'd probably be upper mid table, and no one would be calling for Ralph's head.

Glad to oblige.

That's happened!

So your favourite SaintsWeb thing is something that's never happened?

Yes, but I assume @SNSUN was considering recent results. Actually, if you want to choose one of those, I would take the draw against Leeds from another JWP splendid free kick. If we lose our last 3 matches (very possible) I can see Burnley and Everton overtaking us, but can't see Leeds getting more than 6 more points: which means at worst we'd finish above them on goal difference (assuming we don't get a rogering by Liverpool).

Saints take the lead: Tater: "Crystal Palace haven't won a game this season after falling behind." Me: "Oh f***ing shit ..."

So basically a one innings match. Weatherley out for nought. A grand total of 1 run for the match. Can’t they find a better opener?

It's a bloody disgrace. The club should've been more careful and this wouldn't have happened.

So I'm guessing you won't enjoy the "Broja signs for Newcastle" thread if that happens?

One word: Saganowski. Not saying FF is deliberately playing at his best potential, conveniently when his contract is about to expire. But it's possible he's now subconsciously playing at 100% because of it, which could again dip after a new contract, if history is to repeat itself. The club got badly burned with his last renewal, so I'm in the "let go" camp.

@Dman and @TWar decide to meet up for a drink to discuss Broja.

Google Scarlett Johansson and you'll feel better.