Window Cleaner

I wouldn't even bother replying to all of the petty grievances being aired here if I were you, you'll be here all week. some people seem to attach far more importance to a striped shirt than they do to the progress made in 4 and a half years.

Why on earth would we want anything to do with that old dinosaur anyway, he's nigh on 80. football has changed, I'd very much doubt that he's changed with it. You only have to listen to the clueless Merrington to know how much the game has moved on, or watch a Fat Sam side getting slammed by City for that matter.

don't worry about it Viking, I once got disengaged (if that's the right term) because I went to the FA Cup semi in 1976 instead of a sister's wedding. Turned out OK for me though...she came back...and then left again to be sure over some other trifling misdemeanour on my part, my secretary might have had something to do with it, they usually did .

Although it could signal the end of probate, Mali enlarged their board then abouts, bankers and traders mostly it would seem.

Although I'm not sure that it wasn't more to do with WBA going to 3 strikers away from home against a tiring side. They needed a point at least and went for it, we held them off and they got f*ck all. It's football. However we needed to be more efficient in front of goal when we dominated in the first hour or so, it's our main failing. Look at that volley that Rickie got all wrong, now Aguero or someone of his ilk would have just dropped to one side and sunk that with a sort of scissors kick. Rickie just doesn't have that sort of action in his kitbag so he got underneath it;..

Anyway good business men never buy anything much with their own money. I suspect that's the basis of stock markets and stuff, couldn't be sure though. We're in a good place right now, various people are to be thanked for putting us there but I'd as soon that all the current confusion reaches it's end soon enough. I won't even mind if we're sold unless it's to a whack job like Tan.

Anyway chaps of a respectable age do not have girlfriends, you brits should adopt compagnon or bonne amie. Kids have girlfriends.

I shall look forward to that, it will no doubt be juicy. And for GM it's rein in, kings and queens reign.

Obviously you have no idea what you're talking about. The Mali Group is independant of the Liebherr group, ie nothing to do with it whatsoever. You are just getting confused as have no doubt many before you. This is exactly what I was just saying, confusion reigns in general over this. The Mali group consisted of 5 or 6 releatively small companies in various domains, it has nothing to do with the Liebherr main group.

because no evidence of ML ever actually having 3+ billion (whatevers) actually exists. He was a rich man certainly but I'm sure that there is great confusion about tha actual attribution of wealth in the entire Liebherr family. No-one knows exactly who has what because no information exists in the public domain. All you can get is hearsay and wild speculation. However the way the group has been run down to virtually nothing in these last years and the fact that up until a few months back Cortese seems to have been in virtual charge of everything still tells me much.

"Personally I have never believed" now what exactly does that say ? All I really know is that the Mali Group empire has been systematically broken up over these last 3 and a half years or so and all that now remains is a sort of brokerage affair registered in Zurich. recently there have been directoral changes (mid October) Cortese out, KL and a bloke called Nicolaus Issenmann in . All this is in the public domain, anyone can look it up. Perhaps some of the fiswizzs can tell you more, I certainly can't.

I have absolutely no idea, you'd have to look up all the Mali International Group AG holdings one by one and then try to find out details of the liquidation. Personally I have never believed that the late Markus had anywhere near the amounts of funds attributed to him so (often said so on this very forum as well) so nothing would really surprise me. If someone told me we are skint tomorrow then it just wouldn't come as any sort of great shock at all.

but they had no plans to sell him so nothing has been contradicted. Needs real game time anyway and with the Cropper/Gazza bottleneck in the U21s it's good for him.

Exactly what I said; "No player that the manager wishes to retain will be sold or loaned out in this transfer window". That's a statement of intent.

we have no proof of her personal wealth, none whatsoever. The Mali group has been reduced to virtually nothing, all sold and liquidated. Cortese ran it all of late anyway.

No-one would want to actually buy any of those anyway, best we can hope for there is some very long loan periods, say 2 years or so. Anyway players not being loaned out isn't covered anywhere in the statement.

Well for journalists who can presumably grasp the English language quite well you'd have to wonder how they've converted "no plans to sell players" into pledging not to sell players. They are not one and the same thing. No plans just means no active schemes to sell players it doesn't mean they won't. Then again as we're dealing with a Swiss national perhaps they don't realise that. What she needs to say is No player that the manager seeks to retain will be sold in this transfer window, now that's a statement of intent not a wishy washy no plans etc.

No, they'll be granted extra tickets I expect. They've had a bit over 3000 but I believe they're officially entitled to 15% unless we find some excuse to refuse them on safety grounds.

probably in case they farted during the game.

I think we can safely assume that everyone who wants to buy a ticket for this game be they Yeovil supporters or Saints supporters will find the offer meets the demand. No-one will be turned away.

So then who decides, Mauricio was clear about it yesterday, only with his consent and he won't be giving that for anyone he wants to keep. All that the Chairperson's statement says to me is "don't come round waving beer-mats and bottle tops looking for bargains"

but if you had the right offer !!!!!!!!!!!!

Well you could if you want to argue semantics, "The club has no plans to sell any players during the January window" doesn't actually say no player will be sold if the right offer came along. It's only Mauricio who says that no player he wants to stay will leave.

well they won't will they, their contracts were with the club as would be any non-disclosure clauses. The fact that one bloke leaves just changes nothing in that respect.

Isn't that just a wholly owned subsidary of DMSWL 613 Ltd (or whatever it is) ?