shurlock

No wrong on every count does pal.

Remember this is the same chump who’s been railing against parliament and remainiac traitors for blocking no-deal; yet it’s that very act that has driven the rise in the £. Pompey poly’s second most famous graduate doesn’t know whether he’s coming or going. Needless to say it was pretty predictable that the pound would react favourably when the benn bill passed (and even its passing was pretty predictable once Johnson and Cummings escalated matters by proroguing Parliament). #quidsin

They’re basically peas in the pod with the ‘virtue signaling’ brigade.

Trudeau looks like omar shariff cross-bred with jim carrey's the mask.

Just for you trousers That's got to be one of the most comprehensive black-up jobs i've ever seen. Not a proverbial stone left unturned.

#mess

Yep. An article written by an oddball for other oddballs. There are fundamental constitutional principles at stake here regarding the appropriate role and powers of government, parliament and the courts. Whatever the result, anyone with an interest in the health of our democracy should welcome the case. Given the murky, unwritten and evolutionary nature of the British constitution, its only by bringing cases like this that constitutional principles can be fleshed out and given practical form. Emphasising the fact that remainers are bringing the case is at best irrelevant and ignorant and at worst dangerous demagoguery. Ultimately the case will be determined as a matter of law, not politics, by the supreme court 'without fear or favour, affection or ill will'. The whole idea of a remain elite using its wealth to milk the legal system (access which is beyond the reach of the rest of us) is just projection and gibberish by dopey, sulky Brendan. Lets not forget that the Brexit Party is unsurpassed in its litigiousness and attempts to silence journalists and private individuals or that Brexiters like Robin Tilbrook and Bill Legg have merrily brought cases before the courts involving constitutional matters, claiming for example that the extension of article 50 was illegal. Then again Robin Tilbrook’s only a partner at a law firm and freeman of the City of London and Bill Legg was only once chief executive of the conservative party, so they don’t really count as part of the elite

What a load of pony.

How about his performance against Burnley? #shortmemory

No he’s saying JWP is better than Nathan Redmond. It’s widely agreed that the employment prospects of the low-skilled suffer the most during economic recessions or slowdowns.

Am looking at his overall performances for the club pal. To date, he’s been bit of a disappointment.

Not sure why the relief per the OP? I thought we were in total control second half. Romeu, Yoshida, Boufal, Djenepo and Adams all had v.good games. Vestergaard was dog****. Nice parting gift from Les. I do hope that he drops to the bench when Danso returns (rather than Yoshida).

Norwich 2up

Old news and frankly irrelevant little fella. This has nothing to do with the grandiose claims that Brexiters made about the deal the UK was going to get and the fact that three years on the reality looks very different. That's the crux of the matter and why many remainers are calling for another referendum. Are you related to Nolan by any chance?

That's the problem with the self-righteous - they think they're judge, jury and executioner.

Remember chatting briefly with him up on a cold October evening up at a Bramall Lane in our administration season. He was a fan before anything else. RIP.

Boycott was found guilty by a court of law. By contrast, your post reeks of excuses, innuendo and unsubstantiated claims. I thought being an apologist for Les Reed and Pellegrino was bad enough; but this takes the biscuit pal.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/sep/13/domestic-violence-killings-in-uk-at-five-year-high

#slipperyfloor Is she an armless amputee who couldn't break her fall? Strange that she's just got black eyes. Sickening that we have apologists for domestic violence on here.

I want to take you seriously Nick (and Brexiters) but its really hard when your grasp of basic facts is so weak. I assume you're referring to the extradition of hate preacher Abu Qatada but that had nothing to do with the ECJ or EU. That was the ECHR which is a completely separate body of law. The UK will still be signed up to the ECHR when it leaves the EU.

Not really. There's a big difference between producing a document for analytical purposes and an advocacy document that was always meant for public consumption. That yellowhammer was released in the end is immaterial.

Your boy Trump has been tweeting that the US should be doing the same thing.

No. Its not an either-or in practice. There are many options available that fall far short of a fullblown federal superstate. Read Martin Sandbu. Again you don't seem to understand the difference between the EU and eurozone. But you're a Brexiter, so what's new

I guess you don't know the difference between a set of forecasts that was politicised by one of the most political chancellors in living memory and meant for public advocacy and consumption and an internal technocratic document that was produced largely for planning purposes and not loaded with the same baggage. Nigel Evans made a fool of himself earlier today on the radio for missing that obvious difference.