Jump to content

Smirking_Saint

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    18,400
  • Joined

Everything posted by Smirking_Saint

  1. Well, probably not, another day we would have won today (i think that makes sense ?) We have the players, but we desperately need a replacement target man for when rickie isn't about, today showed that Barnard and Connelly clearly can't work together, i would have gone 451 myself, but thats just me. We were in a pretty dire situation when we came down, other teams would have replaced as we did, albeit probably with not the same caliber of player if you catch my drift. We have spent the cash to get top quality signings and our talent is there for all to see. I just think in this league you need a big man up top
  2. +1 What exactly have you proven Alps ?? It is a single game ? Or did i miss the memo that said we had one game and one only to be promoted ?
  3. We need a replacement target man, having 3 forwards in total at the club is not good enough. We also however need another cm
  4. didn't think width or indeed delivery was much of an issue tbf. He played pretty well but with such a lack of meaningful movement upfront or around him there was not much he could create, to me he looked frustrated, as i would have been if playing behind the front two today. We need another striker and soon, one with hopefully height we can play in case Rickie is inured again. I don't think Antonio would have changed that much, Connelly and Barnard can't work together
  5. Hmm yeah, i used to pretend to be drunk and post absolute sh*te on web forums when i was a teen That said, you are worse than alpine, he has an opinion and is generally negative but i actually think you WANT us and in particular NC to fail
  6. Tactically he is a bit worrying for me, as well as his subs some times. But commenting on his signings is pretty laughable, who has he signed that hasn't improved the team ? Saying Dickson was terrible just solidifies my belief that you know the square root of 0 about football, if he keeps crossing the way he was today Lambert will have a field day.
  7. Lol Mental, totally f*cking mental
  8. Davis - 5 Nothing to do but think he was a bit at fault for the goal, he could have looked big and didn't. Kicking was terrible. Buterfield - 7 Thought he looked very good and very solid, won headers, plays the ball well, i would even sit him alongside Fonte when Richardson is fit. Harding - 6 Game of 2 halves, crossing is good and defending was good in first half, worked well with Dickson, then his mind wandered and he didn't get over that mistake. Jaidi 6 - Solid at winning headers but i worry now when the ball goes near him, plus he is just so slow. His mind went walkabouts. Fonte 7 - Class act as always, looks good on the wing 2 !! Puncheon 7 - Don't understand why everyone thought he was bad today ? Worked hard, crossed well, decent shots and passing but with Connelly and Barnard not finding any space he just had no where to pass the ball. Schneiderlin 6 - Started well but faded like everyone else, nice to see him having a go aswell, would rather see him getting involved up the pitch more often. Hammond 6 - Runs around a lot................thats about it, he pops up in the right places but just can't convert chances, if we could get better i would have him on the bench. Dickson 7 - Fantastic game today, constant thorn in the big RB's side, his crossing was fantastic and worked hard, didn't look as good at LB as he did LM. Connolly 5 - Didn't do enough for me, couldn't find the space a player with his experience should be finding. Barnard 5 - Worked hard but had the same problem as Connelly, they got in each others way aswell which figures as they are the same type of player.
  9. Nail on head 442 just doesn't work for me, we look like breaking teams down so much more effectively when playing 451 or 4411 or whatever you want to call it. Hammond is all puff and no end result and connelly and barnard are both strikers suited to playing off of a big man, thats why they don't work or find each other. Jaidi is looking older, clumsier and doesn't seem to concentrate enough and Davis will never kick a ball properly. That said, i saw enough today to be confident for the season
  10. True, the amount of crosses and the amount of times we got behind them showed that. Lack of a proper target man was more glaring.
  11. Spot on IMO
  12. I don't know, we got behind them well IMO, but the floated crosses were just not ideal for the two little men. I would have perhaps tried putting Butterfield up front to hold it up ? Or perhaps Fonte when we were chasing the game ? For me it was glaringly obvious that a lack of a tall hold up player was needed, Fallon was a prime example, if he hadn't one that header they wouldn't have scored.
  13. Also though Punch was full of running and looked good, second half he fell away though, perhaps a fitness thing, as did Schniederlin. You could tell the players lacked ideas of what to do, the problem is both LB and DC are small AND lack pace which means they primarily have to play of a big man IMO and don't work together.
  14. My thoughts exactly, we need rickie or a tall striker as backup
  15. Thats what Plymouth won it with We had 2 Another day we would have got on the end of the crosses or the plymouth defence wouldn't have got the blocks in on time thats all. I am going to finish on this note Am i dissapointed ? Yes. Does AP need to find a plan b ? Yes but for that we need rickie or a rickie type player. Was there positives ? Yes, we defended well (apart from a mistake) and played some good football, hit some good crosses and looked threatening. We were just a bit toothless today, but last year we were 2nd top scorers so it will come. Rickie would have had a field day today.
  16. I am going to ignore your trolling now
  17. Not really, i reckon you ask anyone that actually understands the game of football they will tell you the same. Another day we would have rocked them.
  18. Not on this thread, was on about his past life as Stanley
  19. Lol Hello kettle, meet pot. Anyways i must just not understand the game as well as i thought as i thought we played quite well, just lacked that final bite up front.
  20. If we play like that week in week out we will be promoted, to say we will be relegated like that is laughable, another day and we would have got on the end of the crosses and put them away, Lambert will be back soon and hopefully a proper replacement in case he is out again. Apart from the goal we defended well, we passed well and had excellent delivery, Plymouth got away with it, defended well but on another day the blocks perhaps wouldn't have happened. It didn't go our way today no more no less, watch the floodgates open at MK if we play like that.
  21. He made countless crosses and you pick up on two mistakes, yet you clamour for Antonio who consitently crossed it behind, strange, but outlines your lack of footballing knowledge i suppose. But hey, don't let the football get in the way of your racist comments and prawn sarnies
  22. TBF we didn't do that bad in the second, Plymouth won due to a mistake from the off, which is dissapointing, as our build up play and delivery was very good, along with the stone wall defending by Plymouth and there you go, we were unlucky. If we play like that every week we will be fine
  23. Thought Dickson looked very good, his delivery was fantastic
×
×
  • Create New...