badgerx16

I think it's time somebody summoned Dr Who to sort out this thread.

We can manage without Ramirez, especially away from SMS, and we would better off with 10 men on the pitch than select Fox as the eleventh.

There were 4 more games in the Prem when palace went down. However, you could have pointed out that Brum went down 2 years ago on 39, ( having taken only 1 point from their last 7 matches ).

Does that now mean that SaggyChops has more PL relegations than major trophy successes ?

Are you Alpine in disguise ?

But we all HAVE experience of qualifying for & winning the Champions League

What's to debate ? Hoddle will never ever be even considered for being Saints' manager again. Get over it.

If you are going to criticise a player, at least spell his name correctly. ( And, by the way, you are wrong ).

I wonder what some of our fans would do if they supported this lot, ( in the Evo-Stik Southern Central Division ) : Woodford United Played 42 Won 0 Drawn 0 Lost 42 For 21 Against 185 And in response to the OP, currently not ( mathematically ), but realistically, probably yes.

In summary - a good day for the pessimists.

Nah, it doesn't look like doggerel

I agree, but what was Georgie Porgies growth forecast in the budget ?

"Construction activity fell 2.5% in the first quarter and remains more than 18% lower than it was before the start of the financial crisis in 2008" Manufacturing also fell. And lets be honest, how 'big' is 0.3 of a percentage point ?

Islam started about 450 years after he was born, ( into a Greek Christian family ).

Parliament makes the Law, the Judges interpret it within an established context. Who is to blame - those that create a flawed product, or those that have to implement it ?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22275000 "The government has signed a mutual assistance treaty with Jordan to ensure that radical cleric Abu Qatada can be extradited, Theresa May has told MPs." Let's hope she's got it right.

This is the Feb 2013 hearing http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/279.html This is the March 11th hearing http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/277.html&query=qatada&method=titleall And this is the Jan 2012 ECHR hearing http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/56.html&query=qatada&method=titleall

And every time this goes to Court, we get the same response, whichever court it is heard in. Mrs May has been told, quite clearly, what she needs to do to gain the Court's assent, why hasn't she done it ?

Because the Courts uphold the Law ? Teresa May was told by the Judges that she needed to sort out a stronger agreement with Jordan regarding the evidence pertaining to a possible trial there, it looks like she hasn't done it.

So what do you do when England play an international sports event ?

Living in the past doesn't solve anything, learning from past mistakes might. I wasn't born when slavery was a massive money spinner for British trade, so why should I feel guilty about it ? Should I ask for the Italians to apologise for the atrocities carried out by the Romans after the invasion in 57 AD ?

Funny that, you spend less and auction off the 4G spectrum and voila - you need to borrow slightly less than previously forecast.

I refuse to hold a guilt complex over something that happened centuries before I was born.

Maybe austerity isn't the solution, looks like somebody may have make a mistake in their spreadsheet : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22197958 "Doubts have been cast on research that has been crucial in supporting governments' austerity programmes........ Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff's paper Growth in a time of debt looked at 20 advanced economies since 1945 and found that GDP growth had been between 3% and 4% when debt had been below 90% of GDP, but that the average had collapsed to -0.1% when debt had risen above 90%. The new research says that growth only falls to an average of 2.2% when debt passes 90%." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22213219 "...two Harvard economists admitted a faulty spreadsheet calculation caused errors in a study used by numerous politicians to support their austerity policies,"

12.3.3 Subject to the provisions of Regulation 12.3.4 below, where the Club becomes subject to or suffers an Insolvency Event, or the Board impose a deduction in accordance with Regulation 12.3.2: (a) during the Normal Playing Season but prior to 5.00pm on the fourth Thursday in March, the points deduction shall apply immediately; (b) during the Normal Playing Season but after 5.00pm on the fourth Thursday in March, Regulation 12.3.4 shall apply; and © outside the Normal Playing Season, the points deduction shall apply in respect of the following Season such that the Club starts that Season on minus 10 points (including in the Football Conference if appropriate). 12.3.4 Where the circumstances set out in Regulation 12.3.3(b) apply and at the end of that Season, having regard to the number of championship points awarded (ignoring any potential deduction): (a) the Club would be relegated in accordance with Regulation 10.1.2(b) or 7.3, the points deduction will apply in the next following Season (including in the Football Conference if appropriate); or (b) the Club would not be relegated as aforesaid, the points deduction will apply in that Season and Regulation 10.1.2(b) or 7.3 will then apply (if appropriate) following imposition of the points deduction.