Wes Tender

The bias doesn't come from producing a conclusion I don't agree with. It comes from not applying the same amount of rigidity to its investigations into the same allegations levelled against the other side. Comprende?

There's plenty of evidence out there that several Electoral Reform commissioners have expressed pro-remain opinions. Google is your friend, mate.

You seem to naively accept that because an Electoral Commission plainly biased towards Remain fines one side more than the other, that means that it is a fact that Leave was more guilty than Remain of improprieties. Naive, as I say, mate. Anyway, I repeat also that the referendum was three years ago, and yet you snowflake anti-democrats are still crying your little heads off about how unfair it all is that your side lost, despite the £9 million of taxpayers money spent by the government telling us all to vote to stay in the EU.

The referendum decision was three years ago and your side lost. I know that it is hard for you anti-democrats to accept, but get over it.

They aren't the facts. They're your opinion. You don't appear to know the difference, but that doesn't surprise me at all, mate.

An eminently reasonable stance that can't really be opposed by anybody, apart from those who refuse to accept for whatever reason that there is a substantial problem with fraudulent abuse of postal votes, and indeed university students voting both in their home town and the place where there university is.

Really? A majority of just a few hundred and you don't think that was within the scope of the sort of illegalities that the local Labour Party is being accused of?

The Remain campaign were equally or even more guilty of electoral fraud, but the Electoral Commission is stuffed with Remoaners who largely let them get away with it.

Yes, the Labour vote held up in Peterborough and I think I can why. https://www.politicalite.com/election-2019/exclusive-fraud-convicts-and-ethnic-exploitation-how-peterborough-was-really-won/

I agree. There will be hell to pay if somehow Boris isn't one of the final two put to the membership. As you say, Stewart doesn't stand an earthly in the final two, despite all the leftie media talking him up as a serious candidate. His plan to appoint a citizen's jury to decide how to proceed validates his position as the clown prince of the Party. Does he believe seriously that the whittled down 50,000 should have more validity than the largest public vote ever, the referendum? If he thinks that this citizen's jury is capable of producing a viable solution to the Brexit impasse, then perhaps we ought to do away with Parliament and let them run the country instead. As an aside, if the likes of Soggy and the other wet remoaners on here approve of Three Bins Stewart, that is sufficient evidence for me that he would be the last person I would vote for as Party leader.

You really don't have a clue. Three Bins Stewart has to get into the last two of the Parliamentary Party before being put before the Party membership. And even if he made it into the last two, the only thing that would get him to win would be a fatal accident to Boris.

LD and me are just two individuals, just a couple of voters among the majority of the electorate that voted to leave the EU. I expect that we're both flattered that you credit us with such power over just not our Party, but also the Government and its policy over Brexit. But in all modesty, I have to confess that you ought to be placing the credit for potentially finishing off the Conservative Party with the incompetent May, certain members of her cabinet, and MPs, representing that substantial majority of constituencies which voted to leave, but who can't bring themselves to obey their electorate. Of course, the same existential threat faces the Labour Party for the same reasons.

Don't try and make out that I don't understand the party that I have been a member of since I was 19 years old, nor that I don't understand Brexit. Perhaps you need reminding that you're the one who thought that we would go for a Norway style deal. Just so that you know, I read both Brexit Central and Conservative Home on a daily basis, so I realise that he was in second place among the membership who subscribe to Conservative Home. As Johnson has a record vote on Conservative Home for this polling with now over half of the vote, and Stewart struggles to get just into double figures 40 percent behind, I don't think that him being second is anything significant, is it? He would have to multiply his support by around four times, whereas several rivals would only have to add a small percentage to overtake him. I thought that you were more intelligent than to believe that this poll position for Stewart was of any serious relevance.

You seem to be labouring under the misapprehension that the Conservative Party membership would have given Stewart more than a few percent regardless. It was appropriate that he launched his campaign in a circus tent; the bloke's' a clown. May supporting him only confirms what everybody already knew about her, that she is and always has been a remoaner.

How is your £50 bet that we will end up with a Norway style deal looking?

R.I.P The Change UK, The Independence Party, or whatever they were called. Half the Party have left to become Independents and there seems little point in the other half continuing the Party as a mortally wounded body of non-entities. It's a shame that they will be depriving us of the entertainment value of their continuing incompetence. I look forward to each and every one of them seeking alternative employment come the next election, as they demonstrably have no ability when it comes to politics.

Quick, good close ball control, a real handful. Mane Mk11?

....and cause millions of £s of improvements

Yes, anybody who by dint of just voting to leave your beloved broken and sclerotic EU is thick, racist, xenophobic and a backward far right extremist. So say arrogant anti-democrats like you who express such bigoted views against the majority of their fellow citizens who had the audacity to vote to leave the EU. Regarding the Tory Party leadership, you seem to have overlooked the fact that as it is the Party members who will elect the next leader from a short list of two candidates, the fact that a substantial majority of members now favour a clean break WTO option means that Gove will not emerge as leader. If the two candidates do not include a true Brexiteer, then the Tory Party is finished.

Do you recall our then Prime Minister immediately before the referendum stating that whatever the result was, it would be honoured? You're shamelessly attempting to justify your undemocratic stance by quoting one person. Don't you recognise how pathetic that looks? Next you'll be scratching your head and wondering why The Brexit Party did so outstandingly well in the EU Elections, when they didn't even exist just over 6 weeks ago. I'll tell you why; it's because people like you refuse to abide by the decision of a majority of the electorate who voted to leave the EU. I had to wait decades until I had an opportunity to vote to leave, whereas you want to overturn the decision before it has even been implemented. As I said, your position is pathetic and contemptible.

There's a bad omen about Trump's trip to Skateland - Portsmouth is a anagram of Shoot Trump

People who respond "I'm good" when you ask them how they are. Bloody Yank speak! I was inquiring about their health and well-being, not their behaviour. In the case of girls, I'm inclined to think, that's a shame; bad girls are much more fun. Middle lane hogs on a three lane motorway, when there is nobody for miles in front of them. Massed convoys of Caravans causing traffic chaos on the roads in the summer.

Scroll down to the tweet from Nick Hoadley. It appears that YouGov has been a bit naughty with their poll. Despite The Brexit Party thrashing the main parties in the EU Elections, they only feature in the poll under other parties, and only appear in the poll results if somebody votes for "some other party". Great timing to put out this disinformation so close to the Peterborough By-election, isn't it? In other news connected to Peterborough, apparently the Labour candidate preferred to have a meeting with Gordon Brown, rather than attend the public hustings against the candidates from the other main parties.

As I said, support for your mate is commendable, if misguided. I repeat, Campbell said that he had voted for a party other than Labour, Adonis went one better (worse) suggested that people vote for a party other than Labour. You can spin it how you like, but it still enabled the media to headline it as Adonis suggests that Labour voters vote for another Party. Still denying that the Brexit Party achieved a towering success? I thought that you were more intelligent than to lump together crudely all the factions that you perceived to be remain supporters, as if everybody who voted for those parties wanted to stay in the EU and none voted through traditional tribal loyalty, or that they were concerned for the environment? A vote for the Brexit Party or for UKIP was a vote to leave the EU, predominantly under WTO terms. Votes for the Conservatives and Labour might have been for leaving or remaining, more for leaving in the Conservative vote than the Labour vote. Votes for the other parties would be predominantly remain, but certainly not all. As you don't know the make up of each party's vote, stop pretending that your assertions are anything other than assumptions. It's making you look stupid.

Of course I watched the video and Adonis is all over the place. Even Gisela Stuart as a former Labour MP is incredulous as to what he is proposing, that any Labour supporters who wants Brexit should not vote for Labour to deliver it. I'm touched by your loyalty to your mate, that you are prepared to make yourself look stupid by attempting this whitewash on his behalf. I was trying to think who you reminded me of, employing your normal defence along the lines that anybody who dares to have a different opinion to yours must be a bit stupid and then it came to me. I expect that your mate Andy will naturally claim that the Remoaners won the vote, in spite of his best efforts to cloud the options. In which case, of course, in view of his statement in the video, he would have to include the Conservative vote in the leave column, wouldn't he, thus torpedoing the claim that Remain had more votes. As I say, he does the Leave campaign no end of good every time he opens his mouth.