Saint IQ

Which one is actually ITK then..

Was just about to have another punt on Emery at 8/1 as got 4/1 earlier and it's already jumped down again to 5/1

Lump on Emery then who has moved to 6/1 on Sky bet. 3/1 on other sites.

yep

Did they used to have the same agent?

don't what to make of that, they say according to reports... I thought Koeman said he would honour his contract even when there was talk of Holland job so until all sites go odds on I'm not going to get worried...

He's 1/4 on on Uni bet and 888sport

Bet on Pellegrini 14/1 De Boer 12/1 and Emery 4/1, he's not going to go to Everton. He wants a bigger next step than that. Arsenal, Barcelona or Holland will be his next job. Was so close to backing Austin to come to us last summer at 16/1 then he went odds on to go to Newcastle or something and I decided not to, these odds are simply fabricated from news stories and people having a punt, even smallish bets change the odds.

He's signing this week or next....that's a complete guess..or is it?

Yeah also Mane could of taken off his boots, Prowse could still have them on. I think they're the same height.

If we play a diamond formation this problem won't be an issue. Then you have to play Vardy and Kane as the 2 up, no way can you start Rooney as well.

Our left wing options if we have Lallana on the right are Sterling- used to be good but has been in poor form and his tracking back and finishing is atrocious Rashford- Raw new to senior football let alone international tournaments and is naturally a striker Milner- Work horse but could be considered as average as an attacking option, though will not let you down defensively Alli- Quality player in form but much more effective in his natural position in the middle either AMC or CM Rose- Considering we have 2 decent left backs and are weak defensively would it be a good idea to play both of them considering our other options? Rooney- Played there before under Alex Ferguson and did a good job to be fair, older now though even slower than he was before and personally wouldn't have him in the first 11 Quite a conundrum and none of them seem to be the perfect option. We've been here before for the LW position haven't we

I think that could be an option late on in a game to hold a lead but atm my team would be -------------Hart------------------- Clyne-Smalling-Cahill-Bertrand ---------Dier---Wilshere------- Lallana----Rooney-----Alli---- -----------Kane------------------ I would leave out Rooney n swap for Alli but wouldn't start Sterling and Rashford has just come in so really don't know who I'd play on the left! (maybe Rose?) but we all know Roy will start him.

There's no way you can know that for sure.

What have you achieved since 1995? Nothing. Just the fact you have to register on a Southampton forum shows that we aren't so small time any more and you're jealous of the position we're in, chin up you might make top half next season

I'd rather keep him for a year than get 4m, we finally have a great choice of strikers and are certain to have at least 6 Europa games + cups games next season. Money coming in this year means 4m or leaving on a free after 1 more year will be neither here nor there.

We are with under armour now not adidas?

This "Partnership" will see players go on loan to the club for no wages IMO (So yeah completely free) but in return they need to be played and be in the right environment similar to ours with good facilities and the same philosophy on football. It's complicated to know for sure, probably a annual pre season friendly thrown in there and maybe a small annual fee paid to the club by us. That's what happens in football manager anyway

Because they're a good player and free? Plus the team doesn't have to be made of all loans (pretty sure you can only have 4 long term ones in the English lower leagues) the club will still be able to buy players to sell on as well, they'll just have a stronger squad or first 11 for no money!

If they want a long term plan I think they'd be mental to employ him. De Boer or Emery would be good choices, they say they might struggle in the premier league with no experience, what do they base that on? Koeman had no PL experience has done well, Pochettino had no PL experience has done well etc etc

Someone said on here a few months ago that because he was from southern Italy he goes missing during the winter, plays well in the first few months and the last few months of the season. They actually predicted that soon he will come good as the weather is going to start to pick up and he actually did. When you analyse his goal record and effectiveness for us these past two seasons it actually makes sense

Even GK ones? As in if your first 3 choices are all injured?

Pahars was a pre 2001 signing and IMO Euell was far from in the top 5 worst signings!

Best- Michael Svensson, Niemi, Lambert, Fonte and Mane Worst- Neil McCann, Delgado, Tommy Forecast, Anthony Pulis and the most expensive mistake of the lot, Osvaldo.

As someone else said. your earlier post was a complete non sequitur.