OldNick

I really think that Duncan just worded it slightly wrong and i do understand why he doesnt wish to name places.Although we do know it came from MC herself, perhaps in hios enthusiasm to get across his point he may have made a mistake citing MC, and so perhaps she may not wish for this to be mentioned as it might make her look weak, although I somehow doubt she is in any way, just well meaning.

1965 i know ou have major issues with Lowe but I doubt if any other player had intimidated MC I doubt it would have been put up on here.Do not tell me that LM is any way any less intimidatingand perhaps MC would not risk upsetting him either.

if she was from Pompey she would have more of her teeth strung through her necklace than still in her mouth.

did you also see he said some of the big car companies should be allowed to fail so that they get new greener products coming through.Says the man who owned an airline company and interested in buying a formula ! racing team.Lol

this is a LOL thread.Last season i fielded loads of fans ire as they were complaining about Gb changing the side and now we have won a game playing well fans are suggesting doing so.

Im sure he can, it is the 'physically intimidating'that I was alarmed at especially to a woman.Many said that MC should be chairman ,well that would be a misjudgement as LM and LC are very intimidating characters as well, and if she can't handle RL then Im sure those 2 would be harder to. Mc has the club interests at heart as she she sees it, sitting in roads and stopping people going about their business is not the best thought out plan of attack and os perhaps her judgement is not right.

What thread did you ask me that! I didnt seei t and will answer best i can. You may question me all you wish and of course I will not reveal any of the sources I have. If you can't live with that put me on ignore Im sure many have. I only get snippets and can confirm the above to the best of my knowledge.Wotte took a back seat when Jan was in charge and rightly Jan was left to be his own man. It has been stated by others they had never worked together before and allegedly didnt get on that well. what he did all week (Ihavent asked that question) i assume is to work with the reserves and youth.I really dont know.You have to understand that I just dont call people up to ask questions to put up on here!!! I have a life and so do my firends.Also they have to be guarded what they say as the last thing they need is to be pulled over the coals due to geeks like us on the internet. I also heard from another trusted friend that RL has a 3 year plan.the first is to stabilise the club, the 2nd year to consolidate and the third year is to push on and go for promotion. That means he is expecting to stay, administration may be avoided and the push for promotion should be for the PL not to get out of L1!!!!

i have grasped examples out of the air with no knowledge of the true source, just like you did.I just dont make out that they are fact.

I understand Trousers but after decades of us only winning in the medias mind as the opposition were off colour or having a bad day, I get a bit tetchy

I understand Trousers but after decades of us only winning in the medias mind as the opposition were off colour or having a bad day, I get a bit tetchy

So you are saying she no more or no less that she never said Physically. Thankyou that is a relief.

So you are saying she no more or no less that she never said Physically. Thankyou that is a relief.

I havent lost the arguement at all.You have accused me of twisting your post which Ididnt and then come up with a lame 'it could only have come from the club'. It may have come from agent , bank employee, accountant or just somebody making it up. Your thrust was that it was leaked by the club to discredit. I believe that you only look to find negatives at the club as you wish to bring it down with your constant campaign to de stabilise or pick away at fans morale.please give me an example where you have started a thread that is at all positive in a club sense.

I havent lost the arguement at all.You have accused me of twisting your post which Ididnt and then come up with a lame 'it could only have come from the club'. It may have come from agent , bank employee, accountant or just somebody making it up. Your thrust was that it was leaked by the club to discredit. I believe that you only look to find negatives at the club as you wish to bring it down with your constant campaign to de stabilise or pick away at fans morale.please give me an example where you have started a thread that is at all positive in a club sense.

and you believe all that stuff do you?

and you believe all that stuff do you?

Saga was not faultless, there never is a player who is.He scored 2 very good goals and worked hard, but did no more than his other 2 forwards for effort and commitment. The whole team did well the manager included

Saga was not faultless, there never is a player who is.He scored 2 very good goals and worked hard, but did no more than his other 2 forwards for effort and commitment. The whole team did well the manager included

Any smoking guns can be debated.One thing for sure trousers is that if it had anything to do withRL and could hurt him it would be well debated on here.i have no problem with that.

Any smoking guns can be debated.One thing for sure trousers is that if it had anything to do withRL and could hurt him it would be well debated on here.i have no problem with that.

That sentence is exactly why Duncans post is right to be questioned.It is like saying that there was no smoke without fire re Dave Jones and also that poor bloke who spent years being accused of murdering the girl on Wimbledon common.

That sentence is exactly why Duncans post is right to be questioned.It is like saying that there was no smoke without fire re Dave Jones and also that poor bloke who spent years being accused of murdering the girl on Wimbledon common.

Whilst i understand where you come from on this I do think that MC is doing things with the best intentions, but perhaps a little misguided who has her ear and the advice she may be taking.

Whilst i understand where you come from on this I do think that MC is doing things with the best intentions, but perhaps a little misguided who has her ear and the advice she may be taking.

I dont see he's on the ropes at present. Look at it this way. Saturday the march was attended by less people. The message has been diluted by disagreements how it should be run.The media were not interested, a major mistake was made by sitting in a public highway as it inconvienienced people who may have sympathised but then will be upset. Some fans would have been uncomfortable by the Wotte out stuff. We won and the new manager installed on saturday anyway seems to have given the club new belief. Divide and conquer has always worked in the past and from saturday that has been the case. Until we get a leader of the fans who can embrace all to act it will always be Mickey Mouse.