Chez Posted 31 August, 2010 Share Posted 31 August, 2010 So did he or we take up the third year option on his contract? He signed on 29th August two years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustMike Posted 31 August, 2010 Share Posted 31 August, 2010 better not have! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appy Posted 31 August, 2010 Share Posted 31 August, 2010 I expect Man City will go for him now Robinho has left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRichmond Posted 31 August, 2010 Share Posted 31 August, 2010 So did he or we take up the third year option on his contract? He signed on 29th August two years ago. YES ..... and that counts as Cortese's NEW Squad signing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 31 August, 2010 Share Posted 31 August, 2010 When a contract is signed and it says it is a 2 year or 3 year deal - it does NOT mean it is 2 or 3 years to the day. Football contracts in England end on 30th June. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRichmond Posted 31 August, 2010 Share Posted 31 August, 2010 When a contract is signed and it says it is a 2 year or 3 year deal - it does NOT mean it is 2 or 3 years to the day. Football contracts in England end on 30th June. So, as it is now End August .............. we are stuck with him then ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 31 August, 2010 Author Share Posted 31 August, 2010 looks that way. I don't understand why we signed Pulis on a three year deal. Madness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 31 August, 2010 Share Posted 31 August, 2010 I think it was so that Stoke would buy Davies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Fan CaM Posted 31 August, 2010 Share Posted 31 August, 2010 Please, please, someone tell me that we have got shot of Pulis. Surely nobody in their right mind would give that lad another deal?!?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 31 August, 2010 Share Posted 31 August, 2010 after taking his lad you'd think Pulis would not help our rivals as much as he does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david in sweden Posted 1 September, 2010 Share Posted 1 September, 2010 maybe AP took up the third year option on Pulis, and thats why he got sacked ..can't think of any worse reason...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Katalinic's 'tache Posted 1 September, 2010 Share Posted 1 September, 2010 Maybe EITHER party could activate the deal, which I believe could've been the case with Michail Antonio & Reading. If so, please shoot whoever inserted that clause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 1 September, 2010 Author Share Posted 1 September, 2010 Maybe EITHER party could activate the deal' date=' which I believe could've been the case with Michail Antonio & Reading. If so, please shoot whoever inserted that clause.[/quote'] you can remove the word maybe from that sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Uwe Posted 1 September, 2010 Share Posted 1 September, 2010 I have no idea what the deal was, but my assumption (and that's all it is) is that we were so strapped for cash at the time that this clause was added in as a bit of a "sweetener" for Stoke. Tony Pulis must have known that his son wasn't going to make it in the Premier League so perhaps it was a case of "I'll scratch your back and you scratch mine". Before anyone says anything, I have zero evidence and am just trying to make sense of it all. It's got to be one of the most ridiculous transfer deals ever, who on earth buys a player that is never going to get a look in and then keeps him for not one, not two, but three years! The fact he says absolutely nothing in the media really grates with me; I wonder if that was also another clause added into the deal that he had to keep shtum about it? One word - joke! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toomer Posted 1 September, 2010 Share Posted 1 September, 2010 looks that way. I don't understand why we signed Pulis on a three year deal. Madness. I hope Lowe put sell on terms in his contract, would hate for us to miss out on 0% of nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now