stevy777_x Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 If we already knew we were going to sell all these players, why was Guly released. In the current team we have right now, we could have done a job. Another player off the wage bill, simply this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadoldgit Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 Probably but then we are supposed to bringing others is and I'm sure we can do better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenridge Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 (edited) To get him off the wage bill. They're clearly not interested in building a team just reducing costs and maximising transfer revenue. Edited 29 July, 2014 by Greenridge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sour Mash Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 If we already knew we were going to sell all these players, why was Guly released. In the current team we have right now, we could have done a job. Another player off the wage bill, simply this? we probably didn't plan/expect to sell all these players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenridge Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 we probably didn't plan/expect to sell all these players. I would beg to differ. I believe we've been very proactive in many of the departures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 If we already knew we were going to sell all these players, why was Guly released. In the current team we have right now, we could have done a job. Another player off the wage bill, simply this? He was out of contract Stevy, wasn't doing much and it was probably decided that we might as well try to get some rendement out of Mayuka or Sharp who are in contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sour Mash Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 I would beg to differ. I believe we've been very proactive in many of the departures. Which ones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamsaint Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 would he have needed, or got, a new work permit ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 Yes because he isnt good enough and isnt going to improve plus his confidence was completely shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 That fact it's being seriously considered that he should have been kept on says it all. We have gone backwards 3 seasons in 2 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_Tony Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 Incredible, about 10 weeks ago everything was fine, now we're talking about whether we should have kept Guly! Has it really come to this??!!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 Incredible, about 10 weeks ago everything was fine, now we're talking about whether we should have kept Guly! Has it really come to this??!!? Yup. I'm personally conflicted. On the one hand, I'm alarmed at all the crap that is going on with the club. On the other, I'm just amazed at the sense of entitlement, whether that's tweets or pointless new threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenridge Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 Which ones? I have no idea on specifics and am certainly not ITK. It's just my perception of what has happened over a very short period of time. I might be wide of the mark but I don't believe so. I've just mentioned it on the Guided Missile thread but there's a good chance that Reed is doing a fantastic job of achieving top-end (and beyond) transfer fees on behalf of KL. The JRod situation is particularly bizarre and maybe that is one of the examples as apparently Ralph met with Spurs representatives in Canada last week. To sell a player not yet in full training after an ACL operation has got to be a first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sour Mash Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 I have no idea on specifics and am certainly not ITK. It's just my perception of what has happened over a very short period of time. I might be wide of the mark but I don't believe so. I've just mentioned it on the Guided Missile thread but there's a good chance that Reed is doing a fantastic job of achieving top-end (and beyond) transfer fees on behalf of KL. The JRod situation is particularly bizarre and maybe that is one of the examples as apparently Ralph met with Spurs representatives in Canada last week. To sell a player not yet in full training after an ACL operation has got to be a first. So you think we were proactive in the sales of Lovren and Lallana to Liverpool? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Without a Halo Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 So you think we were proactive in the sales of Lovren and Lallana to Liverpool? I think we made it so difficult for them to stay they were left with little choice and I believe we could have kept them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 I think we made it so difficult for them to stay they were left with little choice and I believe we could have kept them! Are you serious??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenridge Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 So you think we were proactive in the sales of Lovren and Lallana to Liverpool? Those two? Probably not who knows but it's not beyond the realms of possibility we approached LFC. It would be quite likely with Rickie as we seemingly had already agreed for him to leave in January. It's just a view. It might be totally wrong. You don't have to agree, it's not a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 29 July, 2014 Share Posted 29 July, 2014 I think we made it so difficult for them to stay they were left with little choice and I believe we could have kept them! So difficult to stay in the sense that we didn't immediately offer them double their wages or Champions League football? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now