Donald Trump Appreciation Thread

[east-stand-nic]

"I recall Whoopi Goldberg, Bruce Springsteen, Bono, Paul McCartney, Jon Stewart and other prominent celebrities talking about Donald Trump‘s obvious guilt because of him showing up in the Epstein files.

They never give context to what those mentions are in reference to, or that many of them were from proven false allegations that even the justice department and FBI under previous administrations had determined to be false.
They leave out the fact that some of those mentions are about Donald Trump calling authorities on Epstein. Other mentions are Epstein talking to a prominent print journalist about derailing Trump’s presidential ambitions.

So, as long as we’re leaving context out, it should probably be noted that Whoopi Goldberg, Bruce Springsteen, Bono, Paul McCartney, and Jon Stewart are also all mentioned in the Epstein files. Have a good day."

Edited 13 hours ago by east-stand-nic

[Weston Super Saint]

Nice work. Where did you copy and paste it from? Most people will provide a source....

[tdmickey3]

22 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

"I recall Whoopi Goldberg, Bruce Springsteen, Bono, Paul McCartney, Jon Stewart and other prominent celebrities talking about Donald Trump‘s obvious guilt because of him showing up in the Epstein files.

They never give context to what those mentions are in reference to, or that many of them were from proven false allegations that even the justice department and FBI under previous administrations had determined to be false.
They leave out the fact that some of those mentions are about Donald Trump calling authorities on Epstein. Other mentions are Epstein talking to a prominent print journalist about derailing Trump’s presidential ambitions.

So, as long as we’re leaving context out, it should probably be noted that Whoopi Goldberg, Bruce Springsteen, Bono, Paul McCartney, and Jon Stewart are also all mentioned in the Epstein files. Have a good day."

Verbal 🤮

[sadoldgit]

1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said:

"I recall Whoopi Goldberg, Bruce Springsteen, Bono, Paul McCartney, Jon Stewart and other prominent celebrities talking about Donald Trump‘s obvious guilt because of him showing up in the Epstein files.

They never give context to what those mentions are in reference to, or that many of them were from proven false allegations that even the justice department and FBI under previous administrations had determined to be false.
They leave out the fact that some of those mentions are about Donald Trump calling authorities on Epstein. Other mentions are Epstein talking to a prominent print journalist about derailing Trump’s presidential ambitions.

So, as long as we’re leaving context out, it should probably be noted that Whoopi Goldberg, Bruce Springsteen, Bono, Paul McCartney, and Jon Stewart are also all mentioned in the Epstein files. Have a good day."

Yeah but, yeah but….

We are talking about Trump, you giant wankpuffin. The President of the United States of America. The most powerful man on the planet who is currently using his position to bully the world and his own country whilst trousering billions of dollars. The man who is already a convicted sex offender and has many other cases outstanding.

But, again, you deflect.

Engage your brain for a change. It is entirely possible for Trump and Epstein to have had a falling out. That doesn’t preclude them previously having a close relation, which is exactly what happened. 

Think. The fact that they turned on each other has nothing to do with what happened earlier. It really isn’t hard to understand, or shouldn’t be for someone with your self proclaimed massive intellect.

Trump is not just guilty because he is all over the Epstein files. If you can look at what is going on on a daily basis and not see it, it makes you just as complicit in his abuse of power as the others in the MAGA cult.

People like you are the reason we have the likes of Trump, Farage and Brexit. Ignorant to the point that these people can stand there, show you exactly who they are, yet you still support them. 

Your ignorance has been demonstrated on a daily basis on here since you joined, yet you still think that you are the only one who “gets it.” A typical conspiracy theory sucker who thinks that you are brighter than the rest because, to you, 2 + 2 = anything other than 4.

Trump’s numerous appearances in the Epstein files are just further pieces in his dodgy behaviour jigsaw. Only people with a Trump is innocent derangement syndrome will throw in names of those who have nothing to do with what Trump is up to as evidence that Trump is innocent of any wrongdoing.

You are the Saints Web’s version of Pam Bondi.

I know it all goes over your head. Perhaps you will understand this. Every one of your posts should be followed by this emoji.

🤪

Have a good day.

 

[Turkish]

19 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Yeah but, yeah but….

We are talking about Trump, you giant wankpuffin. The President of the United States of America. The most powerful man on the planet who is currently using his position to bully the world and his own country whilst trousering billions of dollars. The man who is already a convicted sex offender and has many other cases outstanding.

But, again, you deflect.

Engage your brain for a change. It is entirely possible for Trump and Epstein to have had a falling out. That doesn’t preclude them previously having a close relation, which is exactly what happened. 

Think. The fact that they turned on each other has nothing to do with what happened earlier. It really isn’t hard to understand, or shouldn’t be for someone with your self proclaimed massive intellect.

Trump is not just guilty because he is all over the Epstein files. If you can look at what is going on on a daily basis and not see it, it makes you just as complicit in his abuse of power as the others in the MAGA cult.

People like you are the reason we have the likes of Trump, Farage and Brexit. Ignorant to the point that these people can stand there, show you exactly who they are, yet you still support them. 

Your ignorance has been demonstrated on a daily basis on here since you joined, yet you still think that you are the only one who “gets it.” A typical conspiracy theory sucker who thinks that you are brighter than the rest because, to you, 2 + 2 = anything other than 4.

Trump’s numerous appearances in the Epstein files are just further pieces in his dodgy behaviour jigsaw. Only people with a Trump is innocent derangement syndrome will throw in names of those who have nothing to do with what Trump is up to as evidence that Trump is innocent of any wrongdoing.

You are the Saints Web’s version of Pam Bondi.

I know it all goes over your head. Perhaps you will understand this. Every one of your posts should be followed by this emoji.

🤪

Have a good day.

 

And he's back!! Coming out swinging as predicted

Why do you continue with this lie? He isnt

[hypochondriac]

It would be good if we found out that Nic was created by an AI to get soggy to reply to posts because they are the lowest hanging fruit imaginable and he doesn't have to engage with any actual arguments.

[east-stand-nic]

2 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

Yeah but, yeah but….

We are talking about Trump, you giant wankpuffin. The President of the United States of America. The most powerful man on the planet who is currently using his position to bully the world and his own country whilst trousering billions of dollars. The man who is already a convicted sex offender and has many other cases outstanding.

But, again, you deflect.

Engage your brain for a change. It is entirely possible for Trump and Epstein to have had a falling out. That doesn’t preclude them previously having a close relation, which is exactly what happened. 

Think. The fact that they turned on each other has nothing to do with what happened earlier. It really isn’t hard to understand, or shouldn’t be for someone with your self proclaimed massive intellect.

Trump is not just guilty because he is all over the Epstein files. If you can look at what is going on on a daily basis and not see it, it makes you just as complicit in his abuse of power as the others in the MAGA cult.

People like you are the reason we have the likes of Trump, Farage and Brexit. Ignorant to the point that these people can stand there, show you exactly who they are, yet you still support them. 

Your ignorance has been demonstrated on a daily basis on here since you joined, yet you still think that you are the only one who “gets it.” A typical conspiracy theory sucker who thinks that you are brighter than the rest because, to you, 2 + 2 = anything other than 4.

Trump’s numerous appearances in the Epstein files are just further pieces in his dodgy behaviour jigsaw. Only people with a Trump is innocent derangement syndrome will throw in names of those who have nothing to do with what Trump is up to as evidence that Trump is innocent of any wrongdoing.

You are the Saints Web’s version of Pam Bondi.

I know it all goes over your head. Perhaps you will understand this. Every one of your posts should be followed by this emoji.

🤪

Have a good day.

 

Mandleson arrested. Thoughts on starmer having to now resign? 

[rallyboy]

1 hour ago, Turkish said:

 

 

Why do you continue with this lie? He isnt

On a point of law, it's stretching it a bit to claim that someone isn't a convicted sex offender when a civil court has found them liable for sex abuse, and when they have a disturbing fifty year history in that field. 

Just saying. 

[sadoldgit]

Another Trump apologist crawls from under a rock.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/10/trump-trial-verdict-white-house-2024-run

As explained several times, the only thing they couldn’t agree on is whether she had been penetrated digitally or by his penis. I think most people understand that equals a sexual offence and therefore he is a sexual offender. As also explained many times, there are states in the US that consider both digital and penile penetration as rape. Those states would consider Trump a rapist despite not being able to determine what he used for penetration. Weird that someone still can’t understand that it is ok to call a convicted sexual offender a sexual offender.

Plenty of other allegations too along with this guilty verdict.

https://19thnews.org/2023/10/donald-trump-associates-sexual-misconduct-allegations/

 

Edited 7 hours ago by sadoldgit

[Turkish]

1 hour ago, rallyboy said:

On a point of law, it's stretching it a bit to claim that someone isn't a convicted sex offender when a civil court has found them liable for sex abuse, and when they have a disturbing fifty year history in that field. 

Just saying. 

he's never been convicted in a criminal court so by the legal definition he isn't, Give SOG boasted he used to prosecute sex offenders surely he of all people would know this.

[badgerx16]

11 minutes ago, Turkish said:

he's never been convicted in a criminal court so by the legal definition he isn't, Give SOG boasted he used to prosecute sex offenders surely he of all people would know this.

Not of a sex offence, true, but he is a convicted felon, having been found guilty of 34 fraud charges in New York.

[Turkish]

2 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

Another Trump apologist crawls from under a rock.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/10/trump-trial-verdict-white-house-2024-run

As explained several times, the only thing they couldn’t agree on is whether she had been penetrated digitally or by his penis. I think most people understand that equals a sexual offence and therefore he is a sexual offender. As also explained many times, there are states in the US that consider both digital and penile penetration as rape. Those states would consider Trump a rapist despite not being able to determine what he used for penetration. Weird that someone still can’t understand that it is ok to call a convicted sexual offender a sexual offender.

Plenty of other allegations too along with this guilty verdict.

https://19thnews.org/2023/10/donald-trump-associates-sexual-misconduct-allegations/

 

Weird that someone who claims to have prosecuted rape cant understand the difference between a civil and criminal conviction

[Holmes_and_Watson]

1 hour ago, Turkish said:

Weird that someone who claims to have prosecuted rape cant understand the difference between a civil and criminal conviction

I guess they split them, and the thresholds, right after SOG moved over to prosecuting (with colour coded file folders from the catalogue) knife crime. 

[badgerx16]

It seems that both USN hospital ships are in dry dock, so neither of them is available to go to Greenland.

[badgerx16]