Things That are Racist

[AlexLaw76]

52 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Narindeer Kaur has to be the most nauseating women in the country right now. I dont have any issue with her message although she does seem to be permanently banging on about racism all the frigging time apart from when that she's posing in the gym or giving make up tips. It the way she does it, every video she posts is a video of an incident with the screen split between it and her sad face, shaking her head, faux tears in her eyes and then commenting on how sad it makes her. It's all about her all the time. Fucking narcissistic twat.

She has done amazingly well for someone who finished about 9th in Big Brother many years ago.

 

[Turkish]

1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said:

She has done amazingly well for someone who finished about 9th in Big Brother many years ago.

 

Shes quite nice looking but she is an absolute dick of a person. Always spouting off and her sad face videos are laughable. But yeah, done remarkably well for herself considering all she seems to do is spout off about how angry she is about racism.

[Willo of Whiteley]

If you want to stop racism it’s probably best for people, media etc to start having a pop at the racist parties like Reform or Restore - that are purely there to incite hatred and division.

Removing sketches from sketch shows isn’t it.

[iansums]

15 minutes ago, Willo of Whiteley said:

If you want to stop racism it’s probably best for people, media etc to start having a pop at the racist parties like Reform or Restore - that are purely there to incite hatred and division.

Removing sketches from sketch shows isn’t it.

Yeah, wise words, that'll teach em, Now, back to your computer games

[Osvaldorama]

3 hours ago, Willo of Whiteley said:

If you want to stop racism it’s probably best for people, media etc to start having a pop at the racist parties like Reform or Restore - that are purely there to incite hatred and division.

Removing sketches from sketch shows isn’t it.

 

He did the meme 😂

 

[Turkish]

4 hours ago, Willo of Whiteley said:

If you want to stop racism it’s probably best for people, media etc to start having a pop at the racist parties like Reform or Restore - that are purely there to incite hatred and division.

Removing sketches from sketch shows isn’t it.

We’ve tried the outrage, we’ve tried forcing everyone not to be racist, maybe Morgan is was onto something?

 

[iansums]

Zionism, apparently.

[Gloucester Saint]

4 minutes ago, iansums said:

Zionism, apparently.

Fucking daft motion, that’ll see them sink further. 

Shame, as always been keen on environmental issues where the main parties swing ignore or aren’t consistent with them, and voted Green a few times in local elections, but taking Momentum and Corbyn’s detritus on board will sink them. 

[Saint86]

2 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Fucking daft motion, that’ll see them sink further. 

Shame, as always been keen on environmental issues where the main parties swing ignore or aren’t consistent with them, and voted Green a few times in local elections, but taking Momentum and Corbyn’s detritus on board will sink them. 

That "motion" essentially calls for the dissolution of the state of Israel as an official green party policy, it's full "from the river to the sea" stuff from them. Polanski has at least said he disagreed with the wording over that part of the motion.

[Sir Ralph]

If they pass this motion, if you vote for the Greens you are racist. Overtly racist policies

[Farmer Saint]

Oof, I hate what Israel's leaders have done in Gaza, and I think they are war criminals and genocidal maniacs, but this is too far.

[iansums]

1 hour ago, Sir Ralph said:

If they pass this motion, if you vote for the Greens you are racist. Overtly racist policies

It would be a vote for a proper ‘genocide’.

[aintforever]

I like that they are standing up for the Palestinian cause but this is not a sensible policy. I get the thinking behind it, and it’s not racist or calling for genocide, but a two state solution is the only viable way forward.

[whelk]

Like these pompous pricks have any sort of relevance to the Middle East or power. Like the local scout group passing a motion about the Donbas. Unelectable and anyone who even considers voting for these clowns would be a complete twat, without exception. Polanski is obnoxious. 

Edited Sunday at 19:22 by whelk

[Sir Ralph]

Which part of the electorate are they targeting with this policy?

Edited Sunday at 19:24 by Sir Ralph

[whelk]

54 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Which part of the electorate are they targeting with this policy?

Muslims

[Sir Ralph]

31 minutes ago, whelk said:

Muslims

So it’s a racist policy which is causing division by trying to appeal to a group with religious beliefs at the expense of seeking to eliminate the state of Israel, namely targeting people of a specific nationality. How can that be allowed? Doesn’t this contradict the Equality Act?

Edited Sunday at 20:49 by Sir Ralph

[Farmer Saint]

8 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

So it’s a racist policy which is causing division by trying to appeal to a group with religious beliefs at the expense of seeking to eliminate the state of Israel, namely targeting people of a specific nationality. How can that be allowed? Doesn’t this contradict the Equality Act?

I wouldn't start this with Reform and Restore on the ballot.

[Sir Ralph]

1 hour ago, Farmer Saint said:

I wouldn't start this with Reform and Restore on the ballot.

Neither have an overtly racist policy they are campaigning on. They are seeking to reduce illegal immigration (as are Labour and the Tories) which doesn’t target a specific race / nationality of people. The perception of racism relating to restore / reform is miles off this policy. Also Labour are the party that was found to have anti semitism within its ranks.

I can’t believe that a party would openly promote this policy. Surely it doesn’t meet the equality act standards

Edited Monday at 07:13 by Sir Ralph

[badgerx16]

24 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Neither have an overtly racist policy they are campaigning on. 

Being anti-Zionist is not anti-Israel or anti-Jewish. ( And I suspect Whelk's comment was tongue-in-cheek ).

At the end of the day, this is a bunch of sandal wearing, tofu eating, comfortably middle class urban vegans showing off their sensitive side.

It's just bollox.

[Farmer Saint]

53 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Neither have an overtly racist policy they are campaigning on. They are seeking to reduce illegal immigration (as are Labour and the Tories) which doesn’t target a specific race / nationality of people. The perception of racism relating to restore / reform is miles off this policy. Also Labour are the party that was found to have anti semitism within its ranks.

I can’t believe that a party would openly promote this policy. Surely it doesn’t meet the equality act standards

I think the problem is that you can't criticise a party for anything racist and then support parties where the leader, multiple MPs and Councillors have been caught being racist. It smacks of virtue signalling, even though it may not be.

[Turkish]

Are we all enjoying Black History Month so far? 

[iansums]

16 hours ago, aintforever said:

I like that they are standing up for the Palestinian cause but this is not a sensible policy. I get the thinking behind it, and it’s not racist or calling for genocide, but a two state solution is the only viable way forward.

Even though the 'Palestinians' have rejected it on several occasions? 

[iansums]

3 hours ago, Farmer Saint said:

I think the problem is that you can't criticise a party for anything racist and then support parties where the leader, multiple MPs and Councillors have been caught being racist. It smacks of virtue signalling, even though it may not be.

......erm, yes you can

[iansums]

3 hours ago, Turkish said:

Are we all enjoying Black History Month so far? 

Best one ever.

[whelk]

3 hours ago, Turkish said:

Are we all enjoying Black History Month so far? 

Does that mean the Black and White Minstrel Show will be getting an airing on BBC Four?

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, whelk said:

Does that mean the Black and White Minstrel Show will be getting an airing on BBC Four?

No, that will have to wait for Black and White History Month.

[Holmes_and_Watson]

5 hours ago, Turkish said:

Are we all enjoying Black History Month so far? 

Our place are having seminars, an arts and crafts day and a black history month party at the of the month. At least!  Never been better, since the budget went up after the LGBTQ+ events were quietly dropped for legal reasons.

[Turkish]

1 minute ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

Our place are having seminars, an arts and crafts day and a black history month party at the of the month. At least!  Never been better, since the budget went up after the LGBTQ+ events were quietly dropped for legal reasons.

I had jerk chicken, rice and peas for lunch and been smoking weed all day in my rasta hat

[Saint86]

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/oct/05/green-party-england-wales-zionism-racism-vote-europe-germany
 

[Holmes_and_Watson]

The person behind the Green's Zionist motion sent a fluffy letter of defence for a guy who was convicted of supporting Al-Qaeda and was accused of being involved in terror plots.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckm23709pjz7o

She's still in touch as he serves a 40 year sentence, feeling that he is a victim of "the system." 

It took a lot more than a single person to get that voted through. In a way, I prefer having parties who have a membership who set out their positions clearly, so the electorate (or the authorities) can judge them on it. 

[whelk]

6 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

The person behind the Green's Zionist motion sent a fluffy letter of defence for a guy who was convicted of supporting Al-Qaeda and was accused of being involved in terror plots.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckm23709pjz7o

She's still in touch as he serves a 40 year sentence, feeling that he is a victim of "the system." 

It took a lot more than a single person to get that voted through. In a way, I prefer having parties who have a membership who set out their positions clearly, so the electorate (or the authorities) can judge them on it. 

This has royally fucked them and glad. Basket cases. Although many voters will be ‘low information’ and won’t realise how extreme this position is. Probably think it is like Bazunu not wanting innocent people to die

Edited Wednesday at 09:13 by whelk

[Holmes_and_Watson]

55 minutes ago, whelk said:

This has royally fucked them and glad. Basket cases. Although many voters will be ‘low information’ and won’t realise how extreme this position is. Probably think it is like Bazunu not wanting innocent people to die

Yup. Polanski wanted the support of Palestinian supporters across the spectrum, while getting to point out that, as he was Jewish, it was all fine.

Well, his membership have given a much more decisive stand, wanting Israel to cease to exist. His attempt at being in two camps has just got him banned from Israel.  

 

The English and Welsh Greens are seperate from the Scottish Greens, after the latter were ideologically captured, regarding gender.

The departing deputy of the Welsh Greens is hoping the Welsh Greens split from the English Greens over this.

I'm in the Popular People's Front of Greens. Formerly the Popular People's Front of Judea, before the fall out over whether Israel and/or Palestine should occupy Judea.

Edited Wednesday at 10:09 by Holmes_and_Watson

[iansums]

27 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

Yup. Polanski wanted the support of Palestinian supporters across the spectrum, while getting to point out that, as he was Jewish, it was all fine.

Well, his membership have given a much more decisive stand, wanting Israel to cease to exist. His attempt at being in two camps has just got him banned from Israel.  

 

The English and Welsh Greens are seperate from the Scottish Greens, after the latter were ideologically captured.

The departy deputy of the Welsh Greens is hoping the Welsh Greens split from the English Greens over this.

I'm in the Popular People's Front of Greens. Formerly the Popular People's Front of Judea, before the fall out over whether Israel and/or Palestine should occupy Judea.

Splitter!!

[Holmes_and_Watson]

Just now, iansums said:

Splitter!!

Your Green People's Front will never get the vote. Especially you. 🙂

[whelk]

I think clear which party a sizeable chunk of Corbyn antisemites have been drawn to since leaving Labour. 

[Saint86]

On 07/10/2026 at 10:06, Holmes_and_Watson said:

The person behind the Green's Zionist motion sent a fluffy letter of defence for a guy who was convicted of supporting Al-Qaeda and was accused of being involved in terror plots.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckm23709pjz7o

She's still in touch as he serves a 40 year sentence, feeling that he is a victim of "the system." 

It took a lot more than a single person to get that voted through. In a way, I prefer having parties who have a membership who set out their positions clearly, so the electorate (or the authorities) can judge them on it. 

Agreed. It would appear that the anti semitism of Corbyn's / Momentum's labour has just found a new home in the Green party. Be interesting where they go from here - i suspect they'll oust Polanski and lurch even further towards a split in the muslim vs LGBTQ+ vote.

[Holmes_and_Watson]

1 hour ago, Saint86 said:

Agreed. It would appear that the anti semitism of Corbyn's / Momentum's labour has just found a new home in the Green party. Be interesting where they go from here - i suspect they'll oust Polanski and lurch even further towards a split in the muslim vs LGBTQ+ vote.

Just to further my point, that you put in bold.

I prefer having parties who have a membership who set out their positions clearly, so the electorate (or the authorities) can judge them on it. 

The beeb had some analyst on who either worked for papers and/or had prior jobs in politics.

Among their suggestions were that Polanski should have buried it; that the party leadership should have veto power over what motions their membership want to raise.

Basically, another party where the leadership makes the policy regardless of what their supporters actual back them to do.

The person who raised the bill is being internally investigated by her own party. But 1022 others happily voted into policy (it won't be in their manifesto, but a single Palestinian state is now policy).

I prefer knowing where they truly stand. One commentator said they now have an Islamist voting bloc, which must be fought by the Green leadership. But there will be degrees right across their party.

But better knowing, through democratic voting within a grassroots party, than the leadership covering it up, and this lot being unleashed in a proportional representation coalition of the future. 

[Saint86]

1 hour ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

But better knowing, through democratic voting within a grassroots party, than the leadership covering it up, and this lot being unleashed in a proportional representation coalition of the future. 

I agree with what you're saying. But whether or not that vote had passed, a significant number of green supporters would still have backed it, and it's little different to factions within a given political party managing to get their preferred candidate to lead it. 

As for PR, I think it would almost certainly result in the greens forming part of the next government. As soon as we switch away from FPTP, people will stop gifting their vote to the big 2 parties and smaller parties (that previously had no chance to form a government) will start picking up lots of votes. Most of the electorate is thick and has minimal awareness, and as you say, the greens won't include their hamas parroting policy in their manifesto.

Edited 1 hour ago by Saint86