Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Although squeezing 67 per boat and all the boats making it across the channel is a phenomenal effort.  The ROI for those organising the crossings must be very impressive.

I hadn't appreciated it was so many in each boat, and yep, it's a lucrative business. A few cheap lifejackets, a little dinghy, load the boat, then bob about a bit until the British ferry service pick you up. 

Christ knows what the answer is, but one is needed. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, egg said:

I hadn't appreciated it was so many in each boat, and yep, it's a lucrative business. A few cheap lifejackets, a little dinghy, load the boat, then bob about a bit until the British ferry service pick you up. 

Christ knows what the answer is, but one is needed. 

raise taxes on life jackets and dinghys? 

Posted
Just now, Turkish said:

raise taxes on life jackets and dinghys? 

Would need the French to do that as that is where they are coming from.  Just the mention of raising taxes in France would lead to a general strike, so that's not the answer.

Posted
Just now, Weston Super Saint said:

Would need the French to do that as that is where they are coming from.  Just the mention of raising taxes in France would lead to a general strike, so that's not the answer.

Yep, and doubtless in true french striking style, they'd be burning the lifejackets and dinghys in protest. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Although squeezing 67 per boat and all the boats making it across the channel is a phenomenal effort.  The ROI for those organising the crossings must be very impressive.

This is what successive past and future governments are up against. Easy political slogans such as Stop the Boats, Smash the Gangs and Let the Navy Intercept them from Tories, Labour and Reform are pointless in the face of it.

The current Home Sec probably has the right approach by removing the incentives to come in the first place. But there will still be numbers trying. The French for their own sake as much as ours need to get back to slashing the boats in shallow waters. Soggy would beat one off about the English far right harassment of migrants in N France but that’s a growing problem too as the smugglers are well tooled up to respond in violent kind.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Gloucester Saint said:

This is what successive past and future governments are up against. Easy political slogans such as Stop the Boats, Smash the Gangs and Let the Navy Intercept them from Tories, Labour and Reform are pointless in the face of it.

The current Home Sec probably has the right approach by removing the incentives to come in the first place. But there will still be numbers trying. The French for their own sake as much as ours need to get back to slashing the boats in shallow waters. Soggy would beat one off about the English far right harassment of migrants in N France but that’s a growing problem too as the smugglers are well tooled up to respond in violent kind.

Indeed. I don't pretend to have a solution, and I suspect that's in part due to their not being an easy one. Ask any flag bearer/ Farage fan what they think can be done (I have, to several) and all you hear is shoot the boats, shoot them, send them back (nobody says where or how), or the default cop out of "I dont give a fuck, I just don't want all them rapist's here". Brilliant. 

In reality, I think removing incentive is the only feasible way. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Maybe EDL day trips can be organised to replace the long forgotten booze cruises?

The far right supporters can get a cheap ferry across to Calais where they can have a day rucking with the migrants in the camp, you know, show them what sort of welcome they will get in Dover, the migrants fight back, carnage ensues and the French will have to clean it up with the millions of pounds we give them!

Win win and keeps the morons off the streets of London?

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Maybe EDL day trips can be organised to replace the long forgotten booze cruises?

The far right supporters can get a cheap ferry across to Calais where they can have a day rucking with the migrants in the camp, you know, show them what sort of welcome they will get in Dover, the migrants fight back, carnage ensues and the French will have to clean it up with the millions of pounds we give them!

Win win and keeps the morons off the streets of London?

Would be a lucrative way of funding Reform. Chuck in a free flag with every booking and the masses would be all over it. 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

As I've said before, many times, there is no solution. We just need to be more efficient at processing and removing them.

There is always a solution. 

Posted
Just now, AlexLaw76 said:

There is always a solution. 

Nobody has explained it yet...can't do much about having a stretch of water between us and France. 

For me, the solution is in part in removing incentive, and then a very streamlined process for processing people who arrive. I'm talking an on paper decision within a short period, say 21 days, then a short time scale to lodge an appeal and with very tightly defined legal parameters, then a load of Tribunal judges thrown at deciding appeals within a very short timescale, then limiting appeals from there.

That still takes time, and money, but the simple reality is that people are here and will arrive here. It's about what we then do.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Maybe EDL day trips can be organised to replace the long forgotten booze cruises?

The far right supporters can get a cheap ferry across to Calais where they can have a day rucking with the migrants in the camp, you know, show them what sort of welcome they will get in Dover, the migrants fight back, carnage ensues and the French will have to clean it up with the millions of pounds we give them!

Win win and keeps the morons off the streets of London?

Fund it all by televising on Sky. Great TV to be streamed in various Carling-serving pubs with lots of ‘come on England’ chants and merchandise. For a bit of balance with Gary Neville, add Richard Littlejohn on co-commentary. 

Edited by Gloucester Saint
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

So much for fixing the striking doctors issue

Oh well

How would you fix it? Cave in to the greedy sods? They had their reset last year and can't reset again. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

Don't say that on a doctors reddit sub. You'll get you're head chewed off!

 

They need to hear it. They think they have public support. They had it last year, but not this time. 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 08/07/2025 at 12:54, hypochondriac said:

Just so long as we accept that the original tactic of immediately folding and giving them what they ask for wasn't worthy of much praise given that it didn't actually solve the problem and simply postponed it for a year whilst making them realise that Labour will basically give them what they want if they make enough noise. 

Presumably you will want to avoid strikes and industrial action again this year so do we give in to the latest demands? What about the year after that? 

Cough cough.

Posted
1 minute ago, hypochondriac said:

Cough cough.

I can only conclude that the last deal left the door open for another discussion about a reset. Shocking business if that's the case. Big raise = slate wiped clean, then cost of living raises. 

  • Like 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, egg said:

I can only conclude that the last deal left the door open for another discussion about a reset. Shocking business if that's the case. Big raise = slate wiped clean, then cost of living raises. 

Agreed and a good post from yourself. Major strategic error to agree a deal without any idea that they wouldn't then be back cap in hand the following year. Just pointing out that this was highlighted by some on here at the time and was dismissed. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Agreed and a good post from yourself. Major strategic error to agree a deal without any idea that they wouldn't then be back cap in hand the following year. Just pointing out that this was highlighted by some on here at the time and was dismissed

I vaguely recall the discussion. I think there were reasonable assumptions that a big deal wouldn't have been left as the kind of interim deal that the union seems to view it as.  Staggering that the door has been left open. 

Posted (edited)

I think I remember saying something along the lines of it's good news as long as they put safeguards in place to stop it happening every year. I'm surprised it's allowed to happen.

Edited by Farmer Saint

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...