Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Yeah good news, yields on 10-year gilts are back down to  Liz Truss levels…

Yes mate, I know.

Did she herself not accelerate the growth? So maybe Labour took a bit of short term pain to start recalibrating down?

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

Lol, the vote would happen every week because there is always someone who is unhappy about something

You'd allow for that by making the threshold high enough that you wouldn't have it happening all the time and you'd have a period where it wouldn't be allowed once you'd called one and it was unsuccessful. If strength of feeling was high enough and your failure big enough then it would be easier to remove you.

  • Confused 1
Posted
5 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

I'd make it so that constituents can initiate a recall petition with a certain number of signatures. Once a threshold is met you're out.

So a witch hunt policy? 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, egg said:

So a witch hunt policy? 

Not if the threshold is high enough. It's not acceptable that politicians can blatantly lie to get elected, renege on most of their promises and then roll out a load of society changing stuff that no one voted for with no means of getting rid before the next election.

We already have recall petitions under certain circumstances. Changing those circumstances can make politicians more accountable to their constituents.

Edited by hypochondriac

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...