JohnnyFartPants Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Here is an idea. Without all the over dramatic people ranting their agendas, how about it if people who are known for their particular views on the current set up or the other choices open to us, each say something positive about the regime they would like to see go. Without sarcasm or point scoring. I will have a go first. I think Lowe is the better choice out of the current choices available but I have to admire the loyalty and dedication to Saints that Crouch seems to have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I believe all 3 major parties have something to offer if combined....arhrr avoiding the sarcasm bit and pointscoring is doing my head in though....;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncoboy Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Okay here is my shot I would like Rupert Lowe to give up his shareholding and leave the club. But........I think that he is an arorgant , incompetent ****............... Oh dear seemed to fail the test on this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junior Mullet Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I hear Rupert is a fine shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Wilde has the best haircut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFartPants Posted 18 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Okay here is my shot I would like Rupert Lowe to give up his shareholding and leave the club. But........I think that he is an arorgant , incompetent ****............... Oh dear seemed to fail the test on this one Made me laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Sideburns Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I think that as Mr Lowe is such an astute businessman that he will hold true to his mantra of 'doing what is best for the football club' by leaving forthwith. I also feel that Mr Wilde will acknowledge and concede that he cannot possibly dedicate enough time to his position given his physical location for most of the year. Therefore I am sure that both men will act in an honourable manner and fook right off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFartPants Posted 18 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Wilde has the best haircut? Seriously, I actually think that if we can admit that the opposite choice is not always the devil then we would probably at least debate the issues without saying stuff like, "Insect Crouch is crap and you **** monkeys" etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowballs2 Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Steve this was doomed to fail from the start..a bit like SOS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickmick Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Okay here is my shot I would like Rupert Lowe to give up his shareholding and leave the club. But........I think that he is an arorgant , incompetent ****............... Oh dear seemed to fail the test on this one :smt082 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurosaint Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I have thought long and hard about this one and the only constructive message I can come up with is - LOWE OUT ! Ps. Wilde out too ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickmick Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I like Rupert because he winds Stanley up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_saints Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I like Rupert's hair do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Steve this was doomed to fail from the start..a bit like SOS Boom Boom! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Seriously, I actually think that if we can admit that the opposite choice is not always the devil then we would probably at least debate the issues without saying stuff like, "Insect Crouch is crap and you **** monkeys" etc. 'insect CRouch' who said that? Come on own up ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladysaint Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Wilde has the best haircut? I disagree I think Wotte's hair cut is much slicker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I disagree I think Wotte's hair cut is much slicker. I bow to your expertize seeing as you are a Lady like and can judge the male barnet on a more appropriate scale...but between Wilde Crouch and Lowe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Rupert Lowe is a c**t, and Mike Wilde is a Quisling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I like Rupert because he winds Stanley up. LOL Winner! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Askham is kind to his cat, probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 For 1 reason or another none of the main shareholders want the club to fail. That has to be a positive doesnt it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 For 1 reason or another none of the main shareholders want the club to fail. That has to be a positive doesnt it? Yep. If it was a patient you'd be willing to pull the plug out by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Jan Poortvliet was simply misunderstood as too is Mark Wotte Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I like Rupert because he winds Stanley up. I like the bloke who threw a rock through Mikes window as it keeps double glazing salesmen in work during the depression. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leslie Charteris Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 For 1 reason or another none of the main shareholders want the club to fail. That has to be a positive doesnt it? Depends how what you think of as failure. Now I don't know any of the the three gentlemen invoved, but... Mr. Lowe may have the financial nous to ensure the club avoids administration - I don't know, time will tell. He obviously has no understanding of football as a game or as a passion and he should keep his oar out at all times. He doesn't appear to consider playing in League 1 a failure. Mr. Crouch seems to be a genuine fan and a good business man in his own area of expertise but hardly did a great job of running the club before. Mr. Wilde? I can't think of anything positive to say! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cellone Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 We are at war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughieslastminutegoal Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 With chubby, bright rosy cheeks like that, Rupert must be a love cherub sitting at God's right hand .... or an exceptionally experienced single malt connoisseur. Sarcasm, wot sarcasm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Mr. Wilde? I can't think of anything positive to say! He is entirely responsible for the club's Flybe sponsorship, paid for selflessly out of his airmiles account with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Depends how what you think of as failure. Now I don't know any of the the three gentlemen invoved, but... Mr. Lowe may have the financial nous to ensure the club avoids administration - I don't know, time will tell. He obviously has no understanding of football as a game or as a passion and he should keep his oar out at all times. He doesn't appear to consider playing in League 1 a failure. Mr. Crouch seems to be a genuine fan and a good business man in his own area of expertise but hardly did a great job of running the club before. Mr. Wilde? I can't think of anything positive to say! I didnt say I think any of them are capable of making the club succeed. Just think that none of them want it to fail. Its a positive what ever way you look at it. How they all try and do it creates less and less things to be positive about IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I hear Rupert is a fine shot. Did your finger slip from the I to the O when you typed that last word? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Lowe could be overseeing 2 relegations in his last 3 years as a chairman and you think he is the better option? ...... Sorry but i just don't think Lowe and Wilde have earnt any "say something positive about the regime" comments. That maybe because i'm one of the "over dramatic people ranting their agendas". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidthesquid Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I think all the Three Stooges have to go. This site is a fair representation of the shareholders - divided, bitter, more interested in point scoring than finding solutions, more interested in seeing the others fail than all succeed together, and happy to go to sh1t as long as their enemies go to. Before anyone accuses me of being just the same as all the others (see above) I think all of the Three Stooges are equally to blame and equally incapable of taking us forward. I only sound pro-Rupert because I can see no prospect of change for the better before the end of the season & a bit of short-term unity behind the team (not the board) just might give us a chance to still be in the CCC come June Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I think all the Three Stooges have to go. This site is a fair representation of the shareholders - divided, bitter, more interested in point scoring than finding solutions, more interested in seeing the others fail than all succeed together, and happy to go to sh1t as long as their enemies go to. Before anyone accuses me of being just the same as all the others (see above) I think all of the Three Stooges are equally to blame and equally incapable of taking us forward. I only sound pro-Rupert because I can see no prospect of change for the better before the end of the season & a bit of short-term unity behind the team (not the board) just might give us a chance to still be in the CCC come June i agree but with rupert picking the team/players i actually believe that it would make no dfference if we had a full house ever week , with loads of noise because the team selection and style of play is not suited to win consistently in the CCC it is imo TO LATE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leslie Charteris Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 He is entirely responsible for the club's Flybe sponsorship, paid for selflessly out of his airmiles account with them. LOL:smt048 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidthesquid Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 i agree but with rupert picking the team/players i actually believe that it would make no dfference if we had a full house ever week ' date=' with loads of noise because the team selection and style of play is not suited to win consistently in the CCC it is imo TO LATE[/quote'] It is probably (but not definitely) too late, but I would rather we went down bravely, trying to do our bit than sitting at home sniping from the sidelines. There will be a whole summer of that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leslie Charteris Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 I didnt say I think any of them are capable of making the club succeed. Just think that none of them want it to fail. Its a positive what ever way you look at it. How they all try and do it creates less and less things to be positive about IMO. I think that's true, too. The only positive I can draw is that Lord Luvaduck might keep us on the rails financially, even in League 1, and slowly, very slowly, we return to times like we enjoyed in the early years of His Lordship's reign. But I'm not holding my breath and I'm not sure I'll live long enough... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 It is probably (but not definitely) too late, but I would rather we went down bravely, trying to do our bit than sitting at home sniping from the sidelines. There will be a whole summer of that i agree with the sentiment and for every home game, and i have only missed 2, i think the crowd have honoured their side of the agreement and been let down badly by the club and its policy. after 47 years of support and watching the club grow for 42 of those years the last 5 has un done all the good work which came before, i have already decided that if we are down before the last home i will attend and spend the afternoon getting as near to the directors box as i can to vent my anger. If i get arrested or thrown out so be it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidthesquid Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 i agree with the sentiment and for every home game, and i have only missed 2, i think the crowd have honoured their side of the agreement and been let down badly by the club and its policy. after 47 years of support and watching the club grow for 42 of those years the last 5 has un done all the good work which came before, i have already decided that if we are down before the last home i will attend and spend the afternoon getting as near to the directors box as i can to vent my anger. If i get arrested or thrown out so be it If we're down before the last home game we should all do something to make the point, but if we still have a chance then we have to keep supporting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRobbie Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 Here is an idea. Without all the over dramatic people ranting their agendas, how about it if people who are known for their particular views on the current set up or the other choices open to us, each say something positive about the regime they would like to see go. Without sarcasm or point scoring. I will have a go first. I think Lowe is the better choice out of the current choices available but I have to admire the loyalty and dedication to Saints that Crouch seems to have. I think Lowe is being used by the other boardmembers as a scapegoat and he probably doesnt even realise it. Whereas Crouch would not be under their influence. ...is that in the spirit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 18 February, 2009 Share Posted 18 February, 2009 If we're down before the last home game we should all do something to make the point, but if we still have a chance then we have to keep supporting for people of my age bracket that does not need to be said because i believe you can be anti lowe and give the team 100% backing during a game , but equally i want to see players prepared to die for the shirt , a bit like Swansea game not roll over and have their clogs removed and tummys tickled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now