Ex Lion Tamer

I think she did it in good faith even if it turned out to be bad. And she inserted a clause to make sure he couldn't sell it on to anyone she didn't approve of

This is interesting because surely Semmens has to take responsibility for poor decisions under him as CEO?

For all that she has made mistakes, Kat has really tried to do the best by us I think. We're quite lucky when you look at some of the terrible owners that other clubs have had

I don't think wanting to play first team football has to be either arrogant or insecure, it's just a desire for the excitement and learning experience of real football and a belief that the transfer market will take you to your appropriate level

There's also no reason for Chelsea to sell until the summer. His value will only increase

He does look like he's carrying there

I think it's the chance to be leading football strategy at a multi club group rather than just one. He'll have people working beneath him at each club doing his old role

Inject this into my veins

Gao > Askham > Lowe

Or he knows he's not good enough for our level and just wants to play?

Hopefully Semmens will stay but if he's been tasked by Gao to sell the club, he'll do that and take a nice payoff if he has to leave

This is a plausible explanation for why media aren't reporting on it and why we don't know the identity of the buyers

I thought Salisu was bang to rights but where the inconsistency lies is that Brighton and villa should both have had players sent off against us for double yellows

Yep, definitely got to use the squad here

We also have to unpick how much credit he gets for nurturing these players so that their values have risen to that level. Having that squad value despite spending much less has to some degree to be to his credit

You can easily turn that around and say that whenever anything goes wrong, some will always say it is Ralph's fault. Even if their "solution" may not have worked in practice. It's an easy game from the stands. The truth, as always, is somewhere in the middle

It's not really a bad line up except Walcott, assuming the Armstrongs and Che aren't fit to start. I'm not sure of the logic of planning for Tues though given the chances of further cases and it being called off

Also, "strong" rumours?

The weird thing is why he signed a new contract if that was the case

These figures are out of the total population rather than just those who have got covid. In reality a higher % of people who get covid would die

It's a solution but I think any government that did it would get voted out by people appalled at the sight of people dying untreated in carparks. And you might even end up with too many vaccinated people going untreated

The vaccine has massively reduced the danger but so many more people are going to get it now, so the load on the NHS could end up the same. Example: these figures are made up but explain the principle: 10,000 cases leads to 1,000 hospitalisations before vaccines. NHS overloaded. 10,000 cases leads to 100 hospitalisations after vaccines. NHS not overloaded. 100,000 cases leads to 1,000 hospitalisations after vaccines. NHS overloaded.

The point is that we'll never develop enough immunity to stop catching the virus altogether, but we will develop enough immunity to stop having to be hospitalised in such large numbers. Vaccines have taken us a long way towards that, but we need infection-related immunity on top to be able to get back to normal

Those illnesses are different because the vaccines are 100% effective. Coronaviruses and flu mutate all the time, meaning we have to keep updating the vaccines (like we do with flu) and accept getting infected on a regular basis (like the common cold, which is causes by other coronaviruses)

It's a question of how fast we can go without the NHS being overwhelmed, but we're getting there