CB Fry

Hodgson is no mug. Vestergaard, unfortunately, is. Those two factors mean that Palace will score second half. We need at least one more. Tough call for Ralph, as taking Vestergaard off for Yoshi means only one attacking sub in the bank. I think he'll stick with him and we hope.

So just to be clear, "no one knows what happened" and "your guess is as good as mine" but previously you have said you believe the club has never fed information to the press, never used their press contacts to manage the message in times of pressure and have never briefed aspirations as firm intent to their press contacts. And you believe that all of the stories are just newspapers making it up and all the false hopes are the newspapers fault and the club are a helpless, innocent party. If "no one knows what happened", how are you so sure of this?

With Vestergaard in the team we only need to score four to guarantee a point.

Amazon Prime is over for this season. They only got the December mid-week and Boxing Day games, that's your lot.

Yeah, like definitely.

Those fickle Watford fans must be full of regret that the club did not show loyalty to Quique Sanchez Flores.

So the plan should be to only sign good players who are guaranteed to improve the team? Clear.

Same team. Can't argue with that.

Rod Wallace did win the league with Leeds. Strange he never got any international recognition but he had a pretty decent career.

We're due a win. 2-1.

If your minimum requirement is a football manager saying they formally and unequivocally promise to do something then god help us all. Absolutely mental beyond belief.

Communication departments of big corporations up and down the land would be high fiving themselves reading this. The only people who ever get anything wrong are the newspapers. Businesses don't ever make promises they can't deliver, it's just those evil journalists, you know, making it all up. Absolute mug.

Being that a metropolitan establishment man from London is the current Prime Minister and was also Prime Minister 2010-6 (and countless times before that) then it's hardly the worst idea in the world.

Latest poll puts RLB in front with the members. Absolute party time in Conservative central office if she wins. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/news/109116/labour-leadership-race-wide-open-poll-puts

Maya Yoshida cannot be the next Prime Minister. I don't think the public will believe that he is strong enough on defence.

Back on the actual topic instead of chatting absolute sh it about voter age and inclination. Those champions of democracy, Momentum, are playing an absolute blinder at the moment. North Korea me right up. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-leadership-momentum-member-ballot-deputy-candidates-a9283826.html

Don't worry. I'm sure someone will be along in a minute to agree with you about how jolly awful I am.

Conflating the seismic changes happening to the print newspaper industry with political party affiliations is utterly moronic even by your exceptional standards.

Fair enough, I wasn't aware of that. Thanks. Her father was a Marxist academic so has something in common with Ed Miliband.

Can't say I am particularly hung up on my own gender or skin colour. I'm stuck with both and I don't think I have spent a nanosecond of my entire life being concerned about either. Thanks for your concern sweetheart. I think Starmer will get "the point" that you dismiss as irrelevant that piling on votes and vote and votes in safe Labour metropolitan seats is not going to actually allow the Labour party to win power and influence people's lives.

So, just to recap, hes done fu ck all and will go to the grave having done fu ck all. Still, you've previously stated you are wealthy enough to never have any concern with government legislation that impact the lives of the poorest so for you its only ever been about purity posturing. The archetypal Corbyn supporter. Cretins to a fu cking man. Lastly, as has been explained countless times on here, vote share is absolutely irrelevant. You get to govern not by stacking up vanity votes in Islington but by having enough broad appeal to win in Worcester or Workington or Swindon. Funnily enough he never got near that. Keep wa nking over your utterly pointless graph.

All white, too. Unfortunately for those with an interest in gender equality Starmer is by far the stand out candidate. Nandy strongest female and then after that three I don't think are remotely up to it. Jess Phillips does not have the gravitas/composure. Good for a soundbite and the new leader needs her in the tent. Long Bailey utterly vacuous Cretin disciple. Making gaffes all over the shop and shoes barely started. Also she has eyes like pi ss holes in the snow. And Thornbury is utterly repellent and voters would hate her. So Kier or Lisa for me.

Do a graph on all the legislation Jeremy Corbyn has passed that will have a actual impact on people's lives. Try and include every single one.

I don't remember telling anyone to "lighten up" on a thread that they have spent the whole time grizzling about the dystopian Orwellian state we are all apparently living in.

Yeah, because you've been a fu cking barrel of laughs on this thread so far.