CB Fry

Nah, he only played 40 times for us. What we want is a proper bona fide living club legend like Garry Monk. He only ever played five games but what games they were.

That was the only one I didnt need to google. They bailed on their plans when they realised that even winning the flipping league doesn't really change anything with regard to core demand. No planning permission, no nothing.

It would be an utter clusterfu ck of an appointment. I'd take Puel all day over Monk who has basically done eff all as a manager - a glorified honeymoon period with another managers team at Swansea and then failure at Leeds. He played a handful of matches for us and that seems to make some people think he has some kind of spiritual home here. Would be a dreadful appointment. Bizarre people slagging Puel are getting wet for a failed Championship level manager.

We're going to Wembley next season, mark my words.

Bournemouth expanding to 14k capacity any year now. How we will compete with that I'll never know. http://mobile.afcb.co.uk/news/article/south-stand-afc-bournemouth-stadium-expansion-plans-3012635.aspx

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/3470822/crystal-palace-plans-for-selhurst-park-redevelopment-are-being-held-up-by-sainsburys/ Palace tied up in red tape and surrounding landowners who are thwarting them pushing ahead to expand to 32,000. But they will leave us behind when that's built after countless years of planning wrangling no doubt about that.

http://m.stokesentinel.co.uk/work-to-start-on-major-bet365-stadium-expansion/story-30089470-detail/story.html Stoke are doing it. They are pushing ahead. They are doing it now. THEY ARE EXPANDING. NOW. Next season they will have a capacity of THIRTY THOUSAND. FUUUUUU CCKKKKK. We are getting left behind.

https://www.expressandstar.com/sport/football/west-bromwich-albion/2017/04/11/west-brom-chief-executive-hopes-to-expand-hawthorns/ In a few years, hopefully, if things carry on as they are, maybe West Brom might expand their ground to maybe, hopefully 30,000. In three or four or five years they'll start thinking about it. Pushing ahead they are. We're getting left behind.

http://www.wdsport.co.uk/2016/11/watford-seek-to-increase-vicarage-road-capacity-to-30000/ Watford expanding to an eye-watering thirty thousand capacity. Pushing on they are. We're getting left behind. Left behind.

What are Leicester doing then? There was a bit of chat about them expanding before they won the League but I don't think they've actually done anything. Hardly pushing ahead. And all those other clubs have smaller attendances/capacity than we do. WE'RE GETTING LEFT BEHIND!! LEFT BEHIND I TELLS YA!!

Utterly ridiculous line of questioning from Paxman, playing into Corbyn's hands. All in all Compo did a decent job.

Into what?

Corbyn so far tonight: officially not sh it. Doing okay.

It's not really a fairy world, is it? It's called Stoke.

While that is true, is also suggest those people won't be outraged and take to the the streets if we did sack Puel. The majority want him out. I don't think there is any constituency of fans that are mad, passionate Puel fanatics that would hate to see him go. Or if there is, it's a tiny proportion. Which is part of the problem - he truly is the most nondescript manager we've ever had. Even Poortvliet had a jolly charm and Wotte was arrogantly hateable. Puel - nothing.

Yes, but there are just as many people on the right (and people actually inside or formerly inside the BBC) that talk about its bias towards the left. Only fu cking idiots truly think the BBC is some right wing propaganda machine. Oh. If anything the BBC is crippled by the desperation to show "balance" as we saw through the referendum campaign. The news reporting the chaos confusion and general idiocy of the Corbyn cabal are not displaying bias. They're just reporting facts, as history will show.

One doesn't need Google to know the LSE was founded by Fabians and is well established as a left wing institution. It's called being knowledge sweetheart.

The Echo survey this week was nearly 70% saying go. 68% of 8,000 participants. You can have a pop at the Echo or the participants of that survey if you like, but only when you bring forward something of equal validity that suggest the majority want him to stay. Good luck.

LSE founded by the Fabian society and a long history of being a left wing institution? That London School of Economics? That one? Stop blubbering and own it. He's your leader and he will succeed or fail on his own merits. Which are none because he has no merit because he is a blithering useless cu nt.

Jesus wept.

You realise there is such a thing as Google right? Not difficult to find. I've been a Guardian reader all my life but also follow people like Guido on Twitter too. Because there's a plurality of opinion in the world, not the dinlow echo chamber you live in. The BBC gets accusations of bias from both sides, which kind of makes you look like something of a plank again, doesn't it?

Here's some people complaining about BBC bias: https://biasedbbc.org https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/03/what-shocks-me-about-the-bbc-occasion http://www.bruceonpolitics.com/2015/06/15/lefties-at-the-bbc/ By the way, the word is "biased".

They really haven't had to lift a finger. He's an incompetent idiot.

We don't care about winning or places in the league, it's just entertaining we want.

There is drivel and there is drivel.