CB Fry

I draw the line at consistently lying about other contributors to this forum, but that's something that is almost compulsion with you. Still, you've absolutely mastered playing the victim card when anyone pulls you up on your compulsive lying as above, so well done you.

One of two jobs next for him. 1. Back to Real. 2. England.

If Chelsea are going to go for a flavour of the month panic buy they might as well lump in for Vardy and be done with it.

I think we'll see who the really bitter ones are within the two years it takes the bearded tit to find himself in the dustbin of history.

Can anyone think of a contributor to this forum who is "quite happy to ignore questions"? I can. And saying that "we", the British people, are bothered about the hijab but "not overly bothered" about the Ku Klux Klan is playground, pathetic debating that you are to gutless to explain despite being asked to several times now. As is your other playground tactic of fabricating the opinions of others and then debating against them. Or lying as it is more commonly known. Something you have done to several posters, repeatedly, over many threads. Try not to belittle others by suggesting they are in the playground when you are debating from the sewer.

Well, he's used this thread to flog his particular hobby horse of having a go at Christianity and harmless/anodyne British seasonal traditions and he consistently shows his contempt for the wider British public, with his assertion that "we" object to the hijab more than the KKK. The thread pretty much unravelled and became unedifying once he got on his "what about the Christians, then" nonsense. Funnily enough "what about the Christians, then" not way up the agenda when the UN get together right now. The unedifying stuff has a source and he is it. SOG gets his attempted little digs in to me and others as well, so let's not pretend he us some wide eyed victim. Now, a SOG attack is an assault on the scale of a towel falling on top of you when you open the airing cupboard door, but he tries to dish it out nonetheless. Basically, if you don't want to get me going on here, don't spout vacuous platitudes which no one has disagreed with and claim them as a unique position only you hold, with the implication that others, ie me, don't understand that or disagree with it. SOG is a forum expert at presenting the blindingly, pitifully obvious as his own groundbreaking thought. That's how to have my goat got and by jingo he's got my goat.

Yes, SOG has run away again.

SOG, I am struggling with this concept. Do you think you could explain this concept to me so I could stop struggling with this concept? Here is the concept I am struggling with: Or are you go to run away, yet again?

No one, but no one, is "struggling with that concept". It's a facile, pathetically obvious point that you are labouring and labouring like it is the greatest insight anyone has ever come to. No one is struggling with it. No one. Get it? I wonder if you will ever grasp that.

Last week. The last published numbers are from the Pochettino season, and we were 16th, which is not actually the bottom four anyway, if we want to get all MLG about it. Let's see if we are still 16th when the next tables are published in April 2016 for Koemans first season.

The Leicester board must be applauded for their unbelievable ability to hold on to their star players in the face of absolutely no interest whatsoever from Champions League clubs.

You two seem to be having a jolly nice time, but no idea what or who you're blathering about. Leicester, if they make it to the top 4 will do it in the manner and in the conditions that I have said countless times could happen. If anything they are proving me right. Good luck them and good luck to you both. Let me know if you have a point to make.

I blame the Christians.

A pointless ramble about nothing, except 1. An attempt to pretend you didn't call the traditional children's nativity an "indoctrination service". If, say, Sour Mash had said similar about a Muslim thing you'd go apes hit. Just an example of your pitifully weak understanding of religion. 2. An attempt to pretend you didn't claim Hopkins was Christian based on her saying "I am the new Christ" which is, at best, comedy blasphemy, basically akin to saying "well they draw pictures of Mohammed so must be Muslim". Just a demonstration of your pitifully weak understanding of religion. 3. In totality this is a pointless dig at an anodyne Christian religious services on a thread about an Islamic Extremist Terrorist atrocity, your constant refrain on this thread. While the UN, the nation states of the a Middle East and acknowledged experts all agree that Islamic extremism is a problem, you've spent the entire thread pretending the terrorists aren't religious at all, and then desperately trawling the Internet for any crime/atrocity/historical war you can attach the label of Christianity to, while showing your utter contempt for normal people in 21st century Britain by portraying them as a hate-filled mob more bothered by the hijab than the Klu Klux Klan. Layered on top of this is your persecution complex where you pretend you're the sane one being picked on. In reality you post ill-thought through nonsense, then pretend you didn't, then lie about other posters, then run away, then smugly claim the high ground. The high ground where people think nativities are indoctrination ceremonies. How about you just try and stop the drivel?

I didn't post on this thread but I did agree with those saying it was an awful appointment. It obviously was, he'd lost to the flipping Faroe Islands. Fair play to them, a couple of weeks ago they were 'mathematically' locked into the top 6, they are already approaching a points tally which means it will require an almighty collapse not to finish top four. But still I think they will fall away a bit one or two key injuries probably will cripple them, as might a getting-carried-away shopping spree in January. I am saying fifth.

Leeds United in the first Prem season probably the closest example, didn't go down but not far off.

There's no way we could have kept Shaw. There there is no club ever, tonight anyway I can't think of one, that have ever toned it down and refused to sell a young defender, especially when the player is good. Is on the news a lot this kind of thing and clubs when they see the bill they will not be forsaken, right? It's just how it is. Tone, so so much is about money now. Not much has changed since we were run by that toff. Fee men, the agents, they run the show now and probably will for ever. Ton of examples of young players going and they will be forever to nearly be like that, you can't just buy players in Exchange and Mart. In ezy-peasy language it doesn't happen and it won't ever. Tonight that's my view and good. Is only an opinion don't read too much into it.

I'll quote this so SOG can pretend to have not read your original post, as well as this one.

Probably the cup game.

When are you going to address my question?

You might want to actually sit down and listen to what Les Reed says about our ambition and how we go about things. Certainly can't remember him saying anything about us "eventually winning the league" but if he did it would be entirely in the context of our principles which are very clear, repeated countless times, completely unambiguous and wholly consistent with our activities over the summer. Recommended you pay attention and understand before you start calling stuff "BS". Hugely worrying that our apparent club historian lapping posts like this up, but then hardly a surprise on previous form.

If in doubt, what-about.

I read this post carefully: When are you ever going to attempt to explain it?

Why have you included Long alongside Ramirez and Osvaldo? Ramirez was bought alongside Clyne and Jay Rod. Osvaldo was bought alongside Lovren and Victor. Long was bought alongside Pelle, Bertrand, Tadic. Newsflash. Some football clubs, sometimes, buy players that don't work out. And when I say some, I mean all. All clubs.

I think Charlie's suggestion that we get rid if rubbish players and replace them with, like, much better players is a brilliant one and I for one am perplexed that Southampton Football Club have never considered this before. Well done Charlie.