CB Fry

Yes. We're safe. Handful of points needed from several winnable games, and we will get them.

What I like about football stadium expansion is that it is just like bringing the patio chairs into the dining room for Christmas dinner. Almost indentical kind of thing really.

For one, I don't think the debate has ever been a "who is best" between the two of them. And for two, whatever the result, it wouldn't put that debate to bed anyway. MP was brought in to take us into Europe, not just be better than sh i tty old Nigel Adkins and to beat teams like stone-bottom Reading. Quite frankly Saturday should be like shooting fish in a barrell for a top ten team like us.

Leeds still look like a basket case, though. Their new owners look like a shower and I'm not sure they actually have any money at all. So Reading are a noddy club but offer better resources than Leeds do for the NPC next season.

Let's be honest, the result of this game really has no bearing on our season. QPR are down. Fulham aren't. And we will finish where we deserve to, which won't be in the bottom three.

Fifteenth, weren't we?

Might work. Might not. Risky. Everyone in the media can go all gooey over Di Canio but as a manager he's achieved jack sh it. A promotion from League 2? Managers who have done that are ten a penny. Could turn out to be a tabloid friendly, better dressed, more Fascist Paul Sturrock.

Was that the press conference when Nigel threatened to stab that Sky cameraman? Nigel Adkins. Effing nutcase. Angry man. So, so angry. I fear for those Reading players. Do you think the PFA should step in before someone gets hurt?

.....you do realise that was a lighthearted pastiche article? But do have fun humourlessly "proving it wrong" for the rest of the season. Waah, waah sumwon said we woodent win. Waah wahh waaaaaah.

Needs to sharpen up his English on tonight's evidence. Looked superb (on the pitch) on MOTD though.

Please give it to Michael Appleton.

How many people on here have said Clyne is "sh it"? Or anything remotely like that? Can't recall it myself. Or is this just being made up by resident forum tw ats perchance?

Let's stop this charade that any of you planks demand accuracy from Mark Lawrenson. You don't really care whether he is right or wrong. You just want him to predict Saints will win every single week. Please Lawro. Please say we'll win. Please. Please Lawro. Please. Please. Just say we'll win. Please. Please Lawro. Please. Please. Please.

This. The journey was far better than the destination.

And an even bigger div equates West Ham staying up with West Ham winning the league. Coooeee.

There was no sarcasm. Nice try though.

Of course it's a f ucking opinion. How the frig can someone saying we will or won't be challenging for fourth/sixth/whatever ever be "factual"? This is a webforum for opinions. Unfortunately littered with utter divs. Christ.

Wes Tender razor sharp as usual.

So you don't want us to qualify. Stop moaning if we don't win qualification matches then.

Why is Alpine getting so upset when he has already said he doesn't want us to qualify for Rio anyway?

If we get to a Wembley semi next season, I guarantee those currently sneeringly dimissing that acheivement as "only a lottery" will demonstrate a remarkable change of opinion.

What I have done is read the actual words in the piece. Not like the divs on here making up what they have decided it says and then grizzling about "accuracy". Total joke.

Chelsea don't have to sign Clyne for The Mirror to be right. Hell, they don't even need to bid for him for The Mirror to be right. On the story as printed, I would say the Mirror are more than likely correct. Mainly because the story came out of Chelsea or someone close.

I think you'll find that isn't "the project". Top half? That kind of lame-ass sh it is what pathetic clubs like West Brom go for. We're top six minimum, top four ideally. The project.