aintforever

Of course it could be, At this stage to me it just looks like some loon having some sort of breakdown tho.

The thread's about terrorism, on first impressions this one looks like a typical Yank mass shooting. Not all murders are terrorism. I'm here all evening if you want any other simple concepts explaining.

Long needs to be part of a front two. I would go with: ------------- Forster -------------- ----Yoshida----VVD----Hoedt----- Cedric----Romeu---Lemina--Bertrand -------------- Davis/Boufal ---------------- ---------Long-------Gabbi---------

Don't disagree with much of this - except I think the The EU will be looking after its own organisation first and it's citizens second - by punishing the UK.

Of course it makes sense. What the MPs at Brussels want and what each country wants are not the same thing - as Cameron found out last year. All the MPs want to stay in the EU and want it to be a success - they don’t want their people forcing a Brexit like we did so will hate it if we flourish outside. You seem to accept that fact that the EU wont want us to have a good deal but just don’t want to call it punishment. I think you’re being naive, just like poor old Shurlock.

Na, I disagree. They are going to do all they can to make sure Brexit fails so will punish us all they can IMO.

Think you're being a bit naive, there is bound to be an element of punishment because they will want to deter other countries from doing the same. We've gone from being an important part of their club to soon be a direct competitor, I'm sure, in the spirit of capitalism they will be doing all they can to make us fail.

It was also very undemocratic the way they ignored the British people's concerns about immigration when Cameron went begging to them prior to the referendum. They ignored us when we were EU citizens so how can they be surprised that we wanted out.

In Nevada you can legally walk around with an assault rifle so they may have. I guess the Yanks think this sort of thing is a price worth paying for their 'right' to carry guns around. ****ing bonkers.

It's complete ****** to say you can't play with two up front. Maybe Pelligrino should give Sir Alex a call to let him know where he went wrong all those years.

He's worse than Puel so far, think he's probably out of his depth. Just hope he doesn't **** away too many points in our "easy" fixtures and make it too difficult for the next guy.

God knows why we stick to this 4-2-3-1 formation, we could play any combination of Tadic, Davis, Redmond, Boufal or JWP behind Long and we will never get enough goals. It's just ****ing bonkers to have a team struggling for goals and having Gabbiadini and Austin on the Bench. We have a good selection of Centre backs, two good attacking full backs - 3-5-2 is the obvious formation.

Either way it's a problem 'we' helped create.

Much of the problems originate from how we and the French carved up the region 100 years ago but that's all history. Having started the illegal war in Iraq the very least we should have done was put sufficient plans in for the country after it ended. the rise of IS in Iraq and Syria is a direct consequence of the lawless vacuume that was left by us.

No you don't have to say that.

I don't disagree, I can't stand the red v blue ****** we are stuck with. It's a choice between a bunch of c*nts and a bunch of well-meaning idiots. If the Tories make a complete mess of Brexit I think there is a fair chance of the well meaning idiots taking charge. The whole Brexit debacle showed how defunct our electoral system is. I wonder how many idiot retainers out there - who keep banging on about Brexit being the end of the World - still went on and voted Tory (the most pro hard Brexit party there is) just because they didn't like the other guy and it's a straight choice between red and blue?

I would happily see them **** off and join a European super league.

To be fair, everything was sh!tter years ago. I grew up in the Thatcher years and remember power cuts, strikes, riots etc. My school was a complete dump with a different supply teacher every week, school trips cancelled, sports teams cancelled etc. Doesn't mean the same will happen with the Tories nowadays.

I think it's fair to say that the war 'we' started in Iraq caused the power vacuum which allowed ISIS to take control.

I thought Long had a good game, if any of the three behind him could score we would be OK. We need to ditch this formation and somehow get Long and Gabbi up front together. Either 4-4-2 or 3-5-2.

"Brexit Jihadists" - that sort of language is going to help reasonable debate for sure. Comparing people who voted leave (the majority of the UK electorate) to murderers of women and kids.

It's very odd wanting a nation to fail just because they chose a different direction to what he wanted. Wether you support Brexit or not you should always want what's best for your country. His sort of attitude sums up what was so bad about the refurendum. Instead of rational debate we just got two sides getting more and more entrenched, both saying absolutely anything to try and 'win' when in the end everyone loses because any rational decision making goes out the window. Brexiteers, remoaners - all a bunch of ****ing ****s if they value their own selfish cause over what's good for us all.

They will be busy then because looked like pretty much their whole lot that sang it. All that fuss about that song is nonsense.

Played well today, unlucky not to get a point. Scoring is obviously still the problem. We have a serious lack of options in the three positions behind the striker, need to change formation because I think Long, Austin and Gabbi are all better suited to two up front. None of them are a Pelle or Lambert.

What an odd point of view.