aintforever

Yeah, because it takes a lot of guts to walk down to the village hall and put a cross on a bit of paper! You plumb. I'm not having a pop at anyone solely for how they voted(not that I expected you or dipsh!t shirlock to understand), it's more the anti-Brexit people who voted for a party with a pro-Brexit mandate - then cry like a bunch of babies because Brexit is going ahead. If the Lib Dems had got enough seats then either Labour or Tories would have had to strike a deal to form a government meaning they could have forced the second refurendum and stopped Brexit if the deal was not what the public wanted.

If you feel that strongly about remaining I would have thought it made sense to vote for a party who could keep us in Europe by having a second refurendum. That's just my opinion. To be fair Labour want a softer Brexit so remoaners voting for them makes a little bit of sense, it's remoaners who voted Tory that are the real ****ing idiots.

I'm not going to boo him but am looking forward to him making a mistake so I can give him dogs abuse.

Don't see the point in marching against ISIS, we all know they are bad already, not sure what it is hoping to achieve. It's like marching against murderers, or earthquakes.

March for what?

Well instead of crying like a bunch of big babies you remoaners had plenty of chance to actually vote for an anti Brexit party and force a second refurendum. No one did, so here we are, stop ****ing moaning.

That's more than 84% of the people that voted. Given that the Lib Dems and Greens were the only parties offering an opportunity to stop Brexit with a second refurendum I think it's fair to say that the UK public are more than happy to carry on with Brexit.

There is no chance of the so called "big 6" breaking away to form a European League. For starters if UEFA decided to form a European Super League I expect only Man Utd and Liverpool would make it in anyway. Teams like Chelsea and Man City are only up the top because they currently have rich owners - they could leave them tomorrow clubs like this could easily end up at the same level as clubs like Leeds, Aston Villa or Newcastle who could easily be "big 6" if they had a dumb rich Arab pouring money in.

Not at all, just explaining why people would. It's really not that hard to understand if you try.

Same here. Because it was in the US my first thoughts was that it was a usual American loonie. For whatever reason the US doesn't seem to have the amount of ISIS attacks that we have over here.

Given that Muslim extremists pose bar far the biggest terrorist threat to us in the UK it's not surprising that assumptions are made when something happens. Just like if a bomb went off somewhere in the 80s our first thought would be 'IRA'. I'm not surprised our resident simpletons can't grasp the concept tho.

They can all **** off.

It's pretty quiet on here when there are car crashes too to be fair.

Of course it could be, At this stage to me it just looks like some loon having some sort of breakdown tho.

The thread's about terrorism, on first impressions this one looks like a typical Yank mass shooting. Not all murders are terrorism. I'm here all evening if you want any other simple concepts explaining.

Long needs to be part of a front two. I would go with: ------------- Forster -------------- ----Yoshida----VVD----Hoedt----- Cedric----Romeu---Lemina--Bertrand -------------- Davis/Boufal ---------------- ---------Long-------Gabbi---------

Don't disagree with much of this - except I think the The EU will be looking after its own organisation first and it's citizens second - by punishing the UK.

Of course it makes sense. What the MPs at Brussels want and what each country wants are not the same thing - as Cameron found out last year. All the MPs want to stay in the EU and want it to be a success - they don’t want their people forcing a Brexit like we did so will hate it if we flourish outside. You seem to accept that fact that the EU wont want us to have a good deal but just don’t want to call it punishment. I think you’re being naive, just like poor old Shurlock.

Na, I disagree. They are going to do all they can to make sure Brexit fails so will punish us all they can IMO.

Think you're being a bit naive, there is bound to be an element of punishment because they will want to deter other countries from doing the same. We've gone from being an important part of their club to soon be a direct competitor, I'm sure, in the spirit of capitalism they will be doing all they can to make us fail.

It was also very undemocratic the way they ignored the British people's concerns about immigration when Cameron went begging to them prior to the referendum. They ignored us when we were EU citizens so how can they be surprised that we wanted out.

In Nevada you can legally walk around with an assault rifle so they may have. I guess the Yanks think this sort of thing is a price worth paying for their 'right' to carry guns around. ****ing bonkers.

It's complete ****** to say you can't play with two up front. Maybe Pelligrino should give Sir Alex a call to let him know where he went wrong all those years.

He's worse than Puel so far, think he's probably out of his depth. Just hope he doesn't **** away too many points in our "easy" fixtures and make it too difficult for the next guy.

God knows why we stick to this 4-2-3-1 formation, we could play any combination of Tadic, Davis, Redmond, Boufal or JWP behind Long and we will never get enough goals. It's just ****ing bonkers to have a team struggling for goals and having Gabbiadini and Austin on the Bench. We have a good selection of Centre backs, two good attacking full backs - 3-5-2 is the obvious formation.