aintforever

I think it is working fine. In theory it should help clubs like us get decisions at the big clubs.

If you don’t believe what he says you could just ignore it, not be a ***t? I have occasionally had bits of ITK info in the past and got similar treatment - it’s pathetic. Unless someone is sleeping with Les Reed or best mates with Mr Gao this sort of info always has an element of Chinese whispers about it. He may have a good source at the club who has heard the info second or third hand, or he could have been bull****ted to himself by someone at the club. Either way it’s pointless and sad to rip anyone to pieces. I guess it’s the norm nowadays for this mong board generation.

The most mental thing I have read on here since JWP is going to be the next Lampard.

I guess that means our genius manager is not going anywhere. Probably too late to sack now anyway, just have to hope Les knows what he’s doing.

Thank **** for that.

Mane was slated by the mongs on here, doesn't mean anything.

I think JWP can only claim to be anywhere near as good as Oakley once he's managed to hold down a place in the team for a length of time.

Smacks of being created by a designer with little knowledge of football.

I expect Palmer has good contacts at SFC, he used to write for the club, not sure if he still does.

The took an unnecessary gamble and it backfired - of course they are to blame.

This. Waking them at a time just before it usually happens breaks the sleep pattern. And it's hard but best just leave them alone.

2016-17 revenue in £m (v 2015-16 revenue) 1) Manchester United 581.2 (515.3) 2) Real Madrid 579.7 (463. 3) Barcelona 557.1 (463. 4) Bayern Munich 505.1 (442.7) 5) Manchester City 453.5 (392.6) 6) Arsenal 419 (350.4) 7) PSG 417.8 (389.6) Chelsea 367.8 (334.6) 9) Liverpool 364.5 (302) 10) Juventus 348.6 (253.5) 11) Tottenham 305.6 (209.2) 12) Borussia Dortmund 285.8 (212.3) 13) Atlético Madrid 234.2 (171)~ 14) Leicester City 233 (128.7) 15) Internazionale 225.2 (134) 16) Schalke 197.8 (167.9) 17) West Ham 183.3 (143. 18) Southampton 182.3 (124.3) 19) Napoli 172.5 (107. 20) Everton 171.2 (121.5) Yet still no signings

Deals can get done quick, you just have to throw money at it. If you try and penny pinch the negotiations are bound to drag on longer.

That’s ********, we wasted over a month in the summer and ended up with someone 3rd or 4th on the list - after sacking a manager we didn’t have to sack. Shambles.

Sounds like floundering to me. Get your target nailed down, then sack your manager, appoint the next day - it’s not rocket science. Other clubs manage to do it, Cortese managed to do it.

The one time we want the victims to win and they **** it up.

Yes, Watford hired Silva just days after the end of the season. In true Saints style, we floundered around waiting for weeks before bothering to do anything about Puel. Then ****ed about a bit for 10 days or so before hiring Pelligrino.

If that was the case then I would get him in ASAP, his CV is way better than Pelligrinos. We played well yesterday but we are still in the bottom three after over half of the season gone.

After today’s performance, if we get a couple of decent attackers in I think even Crusty the Clown will keep us up.

There’s nothing to stop the owners asset stripping if that’s what they decide to do. Weren’t Pompey a limited company when they got butt ****ed?

Worth a punt.

Why are people still banging on about Puel, when he was sacked next to no one on here really gave a ****. It was obviously a monumental **** up sacking him and hiring Pellegrino but at the time no one cared because the football was boring.

To be fair it virtually always the same people who do both.

We need to sit there and clap happily along like a bunch of SWF mongs, everything will be fine.