aintforever

If a player wants to do that they will do it anyway, there is nothing the club can do about it.

I think it's time the club came out and say categorically that none of our players are for sale, the club is loaded and aiming for Europe next season so need the players more than the money. The club also need to let all the players know they are not going anywhere unless they are out of contract. All this crap in the press has taken on a life of it's own and sending the wrong message to our players and other clubs.

Of course we will boo him, this is football not ****ing cricket.

I thought it was a good interview, very positive.

Pochettino wanted to go to Spurs, there is next to nothing that the board or Cortese or anyone could do to stop him IMO. That Echo story is just trying to make an issue out of it.

no.

To get us into the Champions League there is no other way than to throw millions at it.

I think it's naive to think the Cortese left for any other reason than money. He knew we had hit a glass ceiling and the only way through it was millions which KL obviously doesn't want to fund. Also if there was a massive war chest of cash I don't think Pochettino would have left to risk his career at Spurs.

Leeds and Pompey only ever moved forward, until the money ran out. Cortese thought he could keep dipping his hands in Leibherr's purse, when it became clear she wasn't up for funding us to the CL Cortese jumped ship, now his w*nker manager has done the same. Expect a few players to now as well, and it's of no fault of the current owner or chairman.

It will be interesting to see if it was Poch who made Lallana or the other way round.

And could have left us with a big problem if players like Wanyama and Lovren came here expecting a serious CL challenge.

I would take 17th right now.

I'm pretty sure Les Reed was at he club when we hired Adkins and Pochettino.

Whatever we do don't lose Lallana. Shaw I'm not bothered, it probably makes sense to cash in and invest but lose Lallana and a relegation fight is very likely IMO.

F*cking bunch of bed-wetting pussies on here, we will find a better manager no probs, nothing wrong with Kruger's statement.

I'm not goading, I genuinely want to hear your theory that pieces together all these bits of circumstantial evidence into one believable sequence of events. If the US government are in the dock you are making a pretty poor case for the prosecution. You have to come up with at least one possible version of events as to how they could have carried it out because at the moment there is not one piece of solid evidence that contradicts the official theory.

I'm not a huge fan of Moyes but with him we shouldn't go down so would be happy with that.

****ing Argie c*nt, will be sacked before this time next year.

The only thing the evidence in that video (if it is true) suggests is that Mossad possibly knew something in advance and the US were caught with their pants down so went round arresting Israelis in a desperate attempt to figure out what went on and who knew what. Absolutely nothing in there to suggest the US government slaughtered thousands of it's own people. In fact it only suggests the opposite. Until you come up with a one believable possible theory as to how the US government carried it out you will not be taken seriously with your hair-brained ideas. You won't post a theory because you can't.

Interesting that, if true then adds weight to the official theory rather than a US government conspiracy. 1. Muslim extremists planning a massive attack on the US - there is bound to be Mossad agents sniffing around everywhere trying to figure out what they were planning. 2. If it was one big conspiracy by the US government why were they arresting Israelis all over the place? I wouldn't be surprised if Mossad knew what was going to happen and kept quiet as it would aid the Israeli cause no end for the US to have a Peal Harbour moment. None of what was in that video points to it being a US operation, it all points to the opposite.

This, their agents would have been talking for a while anyway. Saints best chance of keeping him would be to let them talk and hope Poch doesn't fancy the Spurs project.

The thing is, if we had the money to tempt a name like De Boer would Poch have left us for the managerial graveyard that is Spurs?

It is the EU's fault that they can't print sh!t loads of money to help the situation though - like we did.

It's a shame but there's no reason why we can't hire someone better. If Poch goes to Spurs he's an idiot - that place is a manager's graveyard.

What is your theory then?