Doctoroncall

Although not a bar, Cadbury's Choclate Orange and Creme Eggs do taste great.

Viz

wheel

Hoops

Blair (tony)

bird

I hope so. I expect there will be some dark secrets to come out of the skates financial books that will give the FL due cause to punish the club. It's just nice to know that will be the case now.

knackered

It could, but I've not seen a computerised system deployed in the public arena without issues!

Planes

He can but PCFC cannot.

I was thinking the same, time to do a bit of research.

and the times...Portsmouth able to avert another points penalty The extra claim from Revenue & Customs is a serious matter. Andronikou said: “The HMRC debt went up from £17.5 million to £35 million. They have had a review of possible tax outstanding from player salaries or from image rights and they have made an assessment.” I'll be happy if the HMRC want to impose a fine as well as asking for outstanding tax on top of the initial claim of £17.5m. I'm getting to the impatient stage and want justice served, but what is more frustrating is there is no clear picture in all this: I can potentially see point deductions coming their way akin to Luton's financial mismanagement, but it's no guarantee. Some say liquidation of PCFC will trigger penalties - is that true? If so, why liquidate at all, especially as they will be CVA debt free after 5 years? The CVA still has to be approved but assuming current figures owed are correct and CVA is approved, £55m needs to be paid. What is AA basing the £25m income and is that projected over the term of the CVA or just the first year? If the first two parachute payments are to be used to pay off the football creditors and the player sales to pay off Chainrai - where's the money coming from to run the club?

This must be a John McEnroe moment.

electricity

You choose the candidate and there is no job sharing.

According to a Human Rights Lawyer, they could get up to £750 compensation as everyone has a right to vote. So do those who wanted to vote have to prove that they were there and attended to vote? If not, wouldn't that leave it open to those who had no intention to vote being able to claim?

Not right according to this... guardian report on CVA meeting

strawberries

Gone for some value... Chester 13:45 Porgy EW @ 16/1 14:15 King's Gambit EW @ 12/1 15:15 Signor Verdi EW @ 10/1 16:30 Tasmeen @ 6/1 Newton Abbot 14:05 Gambo EW @ 14/1, Swing State @ 9/2 15:05 Cloud Nine @ 11/2 15:45 Armenian Boy @ 6/1

No, they are voting to say AA can carry on with his CVA, which he has drafted and is available. If that is turned down, he either needs to start again or liquidated (most likely) the company. If given a go-ahead today, it's a mandate to proceed with the CVA. The actually vote for approval on the CVA will be within 28 days from today.

matt slater blogg: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/mattslater/2010/05/pompey_election.html

The vote for that is within 28 days time. Today is about who will make up the creditors committee to oversee what AA is preposing to the creditors.

You're better off down the pub, it's not the best picture.

Did anyone find wally?