Doctoroncall

Is this the joke where his team mates are in the bar but he still manages to get a draw?

I was lucky to go last time and thoroughly enjoyed it. It was extra sweet as I was staying with a SA friend who was a rugby fanatic and we won the series for the first time in ages playing some great rugby. I'm sure you'll have a fantastic time. On the SCW issue, I thought it was a bad time with what was happening at Saints, however when is a good time to introduce change? IMO, it's better to focus on how to impliment the change for a successfully transistion to where you want to go than to just let it happen naturally as seems the case at Saints. Bringing in a character like Clifford though was a joke - bad personal skills and a maverick who's happen to hit on a good idea.

total football is more than attractive football - it's about pressing the oppostion, reducing their space, the off-side trap, using the ball to create space for us. If practiced correctly the bonus is that it looks attractive. Lets see how intelligent these players are to put the theory and training into a match day situation.

That's great to see, lets hope they can cope and also hope Killer can get through the 90 mins unscathed (remembering what happen to Santa last season).

Have to agree with your analysis Wes, and I suspect certain players are as fickle as some us fans! I'm sure he found it hard to deal with the situation when out of the first team, selected occassional, played with a different strike partner or played a different role last season. I would imagine the exit plan of players was set by the plc and given to JP based solely on financial aspects, although it would be nice to think he had some input on what players could not fit into the system and be sold. What is at risk is if plan A of McGoldrick fails or is injured only John is available when Rasiak has left unless we try another youngster to fire in the goals. How do you balance cost against results on the pitch when in the financial mire? With regard to "low costs with low revenue is no better than higher costs with higher revenue", the differential is likely to be greater the higher the turnover so I wouldn't say it's the same financial position.

Is it possible to load an image for an avatar from one's computer?

Is this it...? http://www.michaelwray.co.nz/sheets.html

As Professor Higgins almost said "I think he's got"!... a shame it's taken him 2 years and lost the club what little money they did have for him to get it. For me, it'll take more than this statement to trust him again.

04/05 season: Not backing Sturrock, otherwise suitabilty was evident earlier and no action taken Board appoint Wigley and cap it with Redknapp Killer injury 05/06 Wrong time to experiment with Woodward as DoF Board put strangle hold on Redknapp which doesn't suit his one dimensional management style. Players more interesting in jumping ship Money spent updating good training facilities to state of the art To many other distractions than focusing on the one objective to return to the EPL 06/07 season: I thought Burley was a good appointment but it turned out to be a financial disaster where it seems he had free reign to sign players in the summer regardless of team requirements Too weak in defence but still unlucky in play off final (agree) Wilde's broken promises 07/08 Lack of defence, defence, defence! Burley again

Most oppostion fans think we are sure bets for relegation... http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2008/aug/03/championship I think they are in for a surprise!

I have to agree!

Firstly it depends on if he fits into the new system, secondly Derby will pay more to him in wages than we can.