Weston Super Saint

He made a really good save last week and that should be cause for celebration, apparently.

The truth is out there, you just need to open your eyes.... In depth article here Statement from BBC here - including full time line of who made contact and when and the outcomes

Lis

Yet the Mods don't want to move this post that is completely off topic and is basically a jibe at another poster. Weird how they are trigger happy some of the time @Lighthouse

Bless - Soggy truly believes he is 'Logan Roy' campaigning agaist the injustices on an innernetz football forum. Mad as a box of frogs.

That's unfair. I don't believe you are a twat. You do, however, consistently prove me wrong about that.

I don't think anyone, at any point, has made any denial that the 'story' isn't true. The 'story' isn't as glamourous as the Sun made out though, but I guess 'man buys porn, legally' doesn't have the same headline grabbing strength as the one they printed.

He gets air sick 🤷‍♂️

I can't, for the life of me, figure out where Soggy gets his disturbed views from, really no idea. https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/ofcom-finds-lbc-broke-broadcast-rules-with-jewish-embassy-reports/ No idea at all

Exactly zero fucks given by me that's f'sure. The same way I don't care about Labour, Lib Dem, SNP MPs being employed to debate politics on other TV shows. They are free to give their opinion and I am free not to listen to any of them or watch any of the TV programmes. You should try it, if something winds you up, don't watch it! Fucking bizarre how simple that concept is, yet you seem to completely miss it. Lol at the bit about it being 'up to Ofcom to decide what sanctions should be applied' whilst completely avoiding answering the question about what YOU wanted them to do in your original post.

When they say they 'don't comply', does this also include traffic laws? If so, it's going to be carnage with tens of cars ignoring red lights, driving on whichever side of the road they want. Although I haven't seen much of that yet so maybe they don't really mean they won't comply? Also, what are the 'laws of nature' that we are supposed to be learning about? I guess there are quite a lot of them so where is the best starting point?

Even when they are 20 years old?

There's that and also why are they giving restaurant vouchers to the players who earn tens of thousands of pounds per week?

It's even nicer to know you are so boringly predictable 🤣

A bidding war for 'kick it at the 'keeper' Adams?!? This is the best day of my life.

I don't 'want him' to be anything. His previous opinions mark him out to be very much right wing, not left wing. Probably why he 'doth complain so much' about all things 'right wing'.

People get sacked for 'doing stuff' that isn't against the law either because they did it on company time or because it could be considered to 'bring their company into disrepute'. Based on the facts we know to date, we have 'man gives money to another person after being sent pictures'. The fact that the man in question works for the BBC and is in the public eye should be irrelevant in this case, unless he did it whilst on 'company time'. I suspect that's why the BBC did nothing when they first heard the allegations. Now they seem to be basing their actions on popular public opinion rather than sticking to their defined principles of checking facts and remaining impartial. All a bit embarrasing for them to be fair.

It's got nothing to do with what I 'want it to mean' - it's about what Soggy wants Ofcom to do. I'm sure he'll claim he meant that he didn't want them shut down, but he also claims he's not racist or antisemitic so take that one with a pinch of salt

As mentioned, I've never watched it so can't give a personal opinion on their programming / news reporting. Their website states their Editorial charter as the following - I'm sure Ofcom will be only too pleased to receive legitimate complaints about their coverage :

I think anyone with any common sense understands what soggy is referring to here....

Is Aribo staying?

I'd have been happy with just one of them being the star of the show instead of the dross we got served up.

Why? I've never watched it, don't intend to do so either, but even the Ofcom website states their remit is : Source Seems to me that all the criticism thrown at GB News at the moment is that it is doing exactly that and making sure its target audience sees programmes that it wants to see!

Investigation from whom? The MET police have already stated that nothing illegal has happened so they won't be investigating. Do you want his employer to investigate? Is it really any of their concern what he does with his money after they've paid him? Is it also up to them what happens to the money he gives to other people? If so, should they be investigating Shell when he fills his car up? The 'victim' (who has said they aren't a victim at all) is 20. Their parents have no say in what they do with their lives so they can shout as much as they want about investigations, drug habits, wasted money etc etc, it makes fuck all difference.

Would you believe that there's this fucking plank for a start?