Jump to content

Farmer Saint

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    4,624
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Farmer Saint

  1. How is it part of long term planning if it's a loan and we have Baz and McCarthy? We just need a 3rd keeper.
  2. They aren't illegal until they have been denied asylum I believe. Until then they are asylum seekers, irrespective of how they arrived: "There is no such thing as an "illegal" or "bogus" person seeking asylum. Under international law, anyone has the right to apply for asylum in any country that has signed the 1951 Convention and to remain there until the authorities have assessed their claim."
  3. Nice hotels - behave. This is where some were housed in Eastbourne until last year. And given money - £9.95 per week if they are fed. £49 if not.
  4. But you can't do that with genuine asylum seekers, hence you have to try and deal with it in partnership. How do you lock them up, we already have too many prisoners? You're not reducing costs that way. As said, you're never going to solve it without economic equality, so you need proper partnerships. If each country in the EU took 0.2% of their population each year in asylum claims, you're creating 900k asylum claims. If they come across in a boat they get sent back to the country of exit. It needs proper joined up agreements with other European countries, but if the asylum claimants know they cannot get into the UK other than by official means then they have no choice. They have some money (as they pay to get over on boats), so they have the means and ability to claim asylum from overseas.
  5. They get returned to a European country that has the space to take and process their claims. If we have space remaining we do it. We're looking to reduce it, you're never going to solve it. 80/20 rule.
  6. You're never going to cut them full stop, it just won't happen. It is a global issue of haves and have nots, and unless we sort out global equality it will always happen. All you can do is have a more joined up approach to dealing with it, and dealing with it as a block. If people knew that by travelling in boats they will not have their asylum claims heard, then they wouldn't travel. When the Tories cut the ability to apply from abroad it's what they wanted, to increase hatred within the country of them pesky foreigners.
  7. Essentially you would have limits by country in the EU and Britain, and if they are exceeded those that do have asylum claims will be offered other safe countries that haven't had their limits breached to be returned to have their asylum claims heard.
  8. But Afghans and Syrians will be able to apply from abroad anyway, as they have real asylum claims, hence they won't be on the boats.
  9. No, I mean to origin. We're always told that the vast majority on boats are economic migrants in which they can be returned.
  10. But they have legal routes - the main issue I thought (and this is what we keep being told by Reform and the ilk) is that 90% coming over on boats are economic migrants...
  11. I know, hence the change in process.
  12. Agreed. Process improvement needed, not legal loopholes. Access only allowed from applying from outside the UK with a legally/morally justified cap. Any that come over on boats are returned from whence they came. All family applicants must be on one single application. If granted permission, then they can travel.
  13. Add to that private plates. May as well stick a "I'm a narcissistic dickhead" sticker on the back of your car.
  14. We didn't purchase well.
  15. That's what happens when the original plan was to have Martin in charge ALL SEASON, irrelevant of what happened.
  16. That was my point, he's told us consistently what he wants, it's now on Spors.
  17. As a winger? Do you know what a winger is because you've just quoted two players who aren't traditional wingers?
  18. Literally no reason to think that whatsoever.
  19. Better cutting in to create room for wing backs - and the point of the word "wingers" is it's a pluralisation.
  20. We have no wingers so have no width with 4. That's the excuse, and that's on Sporr.
  21. The issue is not the managers, it's the players. Always has been.
  22. It depends if you're talking pure finances or PSR. PSR we don't need to. Pure finances we may do, but that's up to Dragan.
  23. On a side note, Ozzy Crawley is a fucking awesome rock name.
  24. What a bunch of cunts...
×
×
  • Create New...