INFLUENCED.COM

You having a pop ?

So you are glad you didn't contribute financially to the site but want to have a say in the way it is administered ? clearly, strange thinking is not exclusive

Not really as this will make them a willing partner

Perhaps a more direct route would be both more appropriate and productive.

Paddy and Murphy are racing up a hill "if I get there first I'm going to write my name at the top" says Paddy, Murphy says "if I get there first i'm gonna rub it out"

Are they really that different to others of their demographic ?

I agree that his views may not be popular but as you state he does put an 'argument' across, you call it argument I would call it matters for discussion and there is reason in his debate regarding McMenemy, does it not grate on you that he no longer goes and as a respected poster informed us will not go as he has to pay, not only like the rest of us but the owner of the club as well ?

For refurbs see ANOTHER extension !

Is this rhetorical ?

If he had failed in his duties then the administrator would have had to report on that failure, do you think for one minute Lowe, Wilde, Crouch would have said "you are right Dave, we will do as you say" ?? I am sure, in private, he would have expressed his concerns on a frequent basis to those 'running' the club.

Rightly at the top, looked at his top ten goals from DW's link, is it bias to think noone else would have a top ten of that quality, beating some of the best keepers of the time.

Or is thought well of by all he has been answerable to ? if he was no good at what he did, considering the position he holds in one of the first departments scrutinised by new management, he would have got the bullet some time ago.

clearly not someone who learns from previous mistakes, I say keep that person well away from our club as we have seen the affect that can have. I posted before that AO was entitled to a role with the club as back then it was muted that he DID play a part in bringing ML to the table, I know confidence can be confused with arrogance but to be booted out once more and in real terms, in quick succession, suggests it can't be everyone else

Agree, not with boiling water but a smack up the ear maybe. Justmike, perhaps you could explain why you do not believe the silence should be observed, if of course, that is what you believe or was it that you overlooked it or it was the only time you could speak with your kids, kinda think you missed an ideal opportunity to explain to your children what it would have been for

I still don't see confirmation of Nationality so will assume he is English

Would that be known by or taught to Muslims in recent times ?

We're not counting chickens are we ? that said, it does feel good right now.

Advice that maybe should have been offered to those in receipt of the letter

Not a scumbag ? urinating on the seats in our stadium makes him and anyone else who would do the same a scumbag

Use away hamster, now, this may suprise you, I didn't come up with it originally !

Always thought he was a good solid defender but then always thought he was injured, recovering from injury, coming back from injury and not match fit, if he can stay injury free then will go back to simply thinking he is a good solid defender

You do realise you are proving the point, don't you ?

Which I think 19C was alluding to, too many are focusing on Lowes loss and should consider the financial implications to other shareholders(it may be relative, who knows) and indeed creditors.

Did he post anything ?

Knew a girl from Fair Oak who had one of them, used to tug at the gizzards with my teeth