If God does exist and he's purposely made it impossible to prove that he does exist, hasn't he played a blinder in confounding those whose whole argument is predisposed on proving He exists...?
Where's your source that they 'absorbed' these ideas simply because they pre-existed rather than coincidentally deciding they were a good idea through unrelated thought processes?
I'm still waiting for MLG to explain why he believes that God isn't making him doubt the existence of God Himself... Surely there must be some irrefutable evidence that God isn't playing such doubters like a fiddle...?
Just because an activity existed before someone else later carried out the same activity doesn't necessarily mean they did it just because it pre-existed. They might have had their own reasons for doing an activity that others happened to have done before for different reasons.
Genuine question.... Why are people debating the existence of God with MLG when he's repeatedly stated that he hasn't ruled out the existence of God...?
How do we know when God made humans, he didn't also invent 'science' to make them believe that the universe was nothing to do with him?
(Yes, I know it's a moot question given the universe doesn't actually exist)