Matthew Le God

I find that hard to believe, I don't think Saints have managed much more than 20k for a normal weekday game this season. Plus Oldham won't bring more than about two or three hundred.

From the Kingsland stand I can't see the corporate areas, is David Jones still going to matches and is he still involved with the club? He did initially survive the administration and was kept on to help the transition, but is he still at the club at the moment?

Nope. Colchester can only get 77 points. If Saints win all 4 games they can get 78 points. Win tonight and Saints go above Colchester.

Only need one team to slip up. Any one of Huddersfield or Charlton or Swindon.

He has been at the club for 4 years and it still amazes me how many people do this!

Debts now £119 million http://www.espn.co.uk/espn/sport/story/18414.html http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/Po...eal.6239564.jp Very different from the intial £60 million reported. Twice as much in fact. Or the £78 million Mr Andronikou said it would "bottom out" at. Also a lot more than the independent forensic accountants report by Vantis. Where are these previously unknown debts coming from? Why weren't they known about before when the independent Vantis accountants team were looking through the books? Seems Mr Andronikou is up to his old tricks of making the debt bigger so he wins the CVA. Something he has been accused of in the past when the administrator of other companies.

As Saint Clark said... Although not confirmed by that statement entirely, it does seem to suggest Dindane may have paid it.

He is copying Jo Moore/Stephan Byers and burying bad news.

You could have simply typed into google... And seen that it is a one off as I said. innit mush lolz etc etc

That can't happen unless he has the funding to do so.

Well it does matter cos if as you say "they have fixed it" then the **** will hit the fan. AA has been accused in the past of fixing the votes of other CVA's for companies.

No they didn't. It was a one off kit for the game and they won't be wearing it next season.

David Connolly was the player doing the pre match interview today on Saints Player. I think this has only ever been done by someone that has started the game in the past. Sooo... Barnard and Connolly upfront with Lambert in midfield and Delldays eating his face?

Using that logic and based on the leaders debate are you saying Nick Clegg will win the election?

Colchester are irrelevant in terms of beating Saints to 6th place. Saints have to win all four games and if they do that then Colchester can't overtake them no matter what they do.

Well they drew with Huddersfield at the Galpharm.

Combine the banner with pro Bournemouth chants and screw with their minds. "Stand up if you love Bournemouth" "We love you Bournemouth we do, oh Bournemouth we love you" etc etc They may well expect negative songs and won't know what to make of it perhaps.

That could only happen if the sponsor is remaining the same. It is not. Flybe wouldn't be happy that they paid to have their logo on show for 46 League games and only have it on show for 45.

Just because you proclaim yourself to be the man that is going to change politics that doesn't mean you would shoot your own chances in the foot. It doesn't mean that for every decision you do the opposite, it some cases the current way is the best way and shouldn't be changed. The Liberals would lose votes if they announced their intentions. You are not going to get far in politics if you lose votes by your actions. If Clegg said he'd support Labour then Tory/Liberal swing voters may not vote Liberal. If Clegg said he'd support the Conservatives then Labour/Liberal swing voter may not vote Liberal. You could copy and paste in Brown and Cameron into that and come to the same result. It is a vote loser to announce intentions before the result is known. Yes, Clegg wants to appear to be whiter than white but he'd have to be insane if that resulted in losing swing voters.

Dune ignores my questions, just like he accuses the Liberals of ignoring important questions. Hypocrite!

Do you honestly think David Cameron would answer the question if it were asked to him? Or indeed any politician from any mainstream political party? It is not in any politicians interest to give an answer to that question as it shows a sign of weakness and defeat before the election has even taken place. Yes, the Liberals won't win, but it isn't the sign of a good leader to be saying what they will do in the event of a loss. That may end up influencing the election against them and lose them seats/votes. The time for discussing who they will support should and will come only in the event of a hung parliament. Until that point it is futile discussing it in public as it may harm your parties own chances and why would they do that? If Clegg said he'd support Labour then Tory/Liberal swing voters may not vote Liberal. If Clegg said he'd support the Conservatives then Labour/Liberal swing voter may not vote Liberal. It is in Clegg's interest to ignore the question. As would also be the case if Cameron was asked the same question.

Although it might end up as a catch 22 situation, what chant could Saints fan use to show they have no rivalry with them when they turn up to St Mary's? Yes, I realise by chanting it might show you care, hence the catch 22.

If you read my original post you will see I said the most likely option is to play Puncheon in the centre. I then said as a "leftfield" option to play Lambert and ended with a wink. Also would a team with Lambert, Barnard, Connolly, Puncheon and Lallana starting not be a team capable of winning against Oldham at home?

You clearly haven't read post 29.

Read post 29 http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showpost.php?p=695503&postcount=29