You did not ask if time exists in the first post.
You asked in the first post...
Do we all believe in time?
Can you be outside of time?
Is a watch proof?
Those questions are flawed questions.
Puzzling why you don't see why evidence is important. I want to believe as many true things and as few false things as possible. We don't do that by blindly believing things to be true, that ends up in a delusional state that does not conform to the reality we live in and impacts on others.
Not really as it is a valid point.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so an old book is not sufficient evidence of miracles. You can't use a book to support the book, that is a circular argument!
I'll try again... not every question is a valid question and not every question has an answer.
An example... What texture is happiness?
Some questions are fundamentally flawed and built on false premises.