Not really... it is the Express that had the story. All the others are simply rehashing the Express in their rumour roundup by saying "the Express says...". That isn't the same as them all having the story.
The Express is one of the least reliable sources of football news.
Is this supposed to be based on how good they are today? Because Lambert wouldn't be anywhere near the starting XI. Gabbiadini, Austin & Long would all be more effective than a recently retired Lambert who struggled at a bottom half Championship side last season.
Plus from your starting XI... I'd rather have...
- Forster than Boruc
- Cedric than Clyne
- Bertrand than Shaw
...and Lemina & Romeu would give Schneiderlin & Wanyama a run for their money!
No
Not unless some of the other clubs change their minds. The "big 6" plus Leicester, West Ham & Everton want the change... the other 11 don't.
You need 14 in favour to get a PL change (as they only have 9 clubs). That doesn't look like happening as things stand!
He was fouled, that isn't being weak. Lukaku cheated by pushing Hoedt, which enabled him to get the ball. It was poor from the ref not to give it as a foul.
It is you that has rewritten history! Just like the media did!
That Tweet from Koeman was merely to show that he was ready for training and all the training gear and cones etc were in place. It wasn't him complaining at a lack of players ffs!
We didn't use our first choice team vs Wolves. I don't see why our best side couldn't get three at the back to work.
These 8 players didn't start the game...
Cedric
van Dijk
Bertrand
Hoedt
Davis
Gabbiadini
Redmond
Lemina
If we do, Hoedt would likely be on the left.
It was poor vs Wolves, but it was also quite different from our 1st choice team. Our best players might make it work as an alternative system. After the Wolves game Pellegrino did say he'd use it again.
No, but it got me out of a long queue to have a metal detector search.
Should security staff really be taken the word of people if they have been searched or not?