Jump to content

NickG

Members
  • Posts

    14,535
  • Joined

Everything posted by NickG

  1. as good as a positive change will be, or even the excitement of a decent rumour, got feeling Lowe/Wilde here for at least next 12 months+
  2. and the record for most consecutive posts on one thread goes to......
  3. NickG

    Watford

    am not one of these fair weather fans, watching all these away victories! I am a hardy season ticket holder hardly ever seeing us win!
  4. same radio hampshire who reported that Surman had been sold last window, when I emailed them re source -reply was a caller!
  5. but if it wasn't for Wilde we wouldn't have had a break from Lowe!
  6. NickG

    Watford

    many going? my first away since Derby play off!
  7. biggest single step back, in recent years, was when Hoddle left - felt we were moving to higher level then it stopped!
  8. I read it that it was already signed - in that it was a clause in the initial contract signed that it would be for one year if he didn't make enough appearances and longer if he did. Appears a done deal.
  9. neither changed tune, nor ****** -just made it simple enough for you to understand! whatever
  10. why dissect it and be so argumentative?? ok, how it about it shouldn't logically fuel his argument but that wouldn't stop him saying it? Its simple. Lowe will say the protesters said they would protest, this was after poor run, they said they were protesting about silly decisions like the appointment of Wotte. He will say after 3 wins they realised they were wrong and went quiet. Best bet, bizarrely would be a protest if we won -to show fans are still not happy with the set-up, but if we win everyone forgets and goes home happy.
  11. its not illogical at all, I don't think they were just about results BUT if someone -RL thinks they were then he can easily say -series of bad results -protests, two home wins -no protests -fans are fickle etc. Reason it is logical is that I am talking about both my thoughts, and pointing out what fits in with his argument
  12. wish people would stop adding to this - it keeps the "administration announcement" thread at the top of the page! doh!
  13. that...saintsweb is not the place to find ITK info!
  14. Can't decide best result for us from Notts Forest's next game, Barnsley
  15. what the thread title? oops sorry didn't think of that!
  16. to be fair we would worry if; they were top of the league fighting for automatic promotion fighting for play offs mid table and no pressure fighting relegation so perhaps being cr@p but nothing to play for is not the worst situation;) (still worried tho!)
  17. or since the reserves became first team!
  18. what happened to forester? Still visiting?
  19. I am sure they didn't stop due to a win - but you have got to see, when rl makes his comments about people not understanding and only moaning after defeat that this gives fuel to the arguement.
  20. the protests stopped after a home win, certainly can't see there being any after a "great escape". Which backs up some of Wotte's comments.
  21. wouldn't be surprised if he was here for years!
  22. if we get relegated there will be lowe out protests - if we stay up there won't be any
  23. not quite accurate -of either my view, nor of the set up- but as you say we have been here before! only raised it again as its gone from involved to the architect -lol!
  24. most read seemless as meaning allowing players to move up to the first team more easily -not no-one knew who was picking team, team talks etc. Sure he was involved but lets not start pretending he was running first team before he took over
×
×
  • Create New...