Greenridge

You know what assume did....

Do we have Golden Threads?

I've not read the whole thread so apologies if I've misunderstood but are you saying you don't rate Clyne?

Who are currently 3rd in the table above the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool. It's a combination of things with Cork, Ramirez and Shaw all coming in at a similar time being influential in the up-turn in form.

[video=youtube;Z3U-r8T31Ns]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3U-r8T31Ns

Unfortunately I think fox has proven - numerous times - that he won't 'do'. Just missing Cork and Ramirez exposed us and these were in positions we had several options. Just look how NUFC are struggling with their spate of injuries, you can't account for every eventuality but cover is definitely need at LB and CB which pretty much everyone has been saying for months and you can only imagine the club realise this too.

Guly was gutted. I know someone who saw him in the players car park with his contract in hand. He said you could actually see where he had used a highlighter pen to mark a section of a page. This chap I know doesn't have great eyesight but he said he could definitely see a number fifteen in the highlighted section. Well as you know it was a tad breezy yesterday and next thing he knows is the contract is flying all across the car park and ended up in dirty great puddle so I guess we'll never know.

The balance of the team seems to get thrown when Guly plays, wherever he plays. He has his moments and has scored a fair share of goals but it always seems a case of shoe-horning him in. Be good to see Puncheon carry on his current form on the right-hand-side, if he does then Guly will continue to struggle to even get in the matchday squad. 15 minutes lollage.

Whether a player is interferring with play can, at times, be very subjective. Not sure it's quite as black and white as you're suggesting. Enjoyed the game today, a good atmosphere and a confident mood about the place. Be nice to follow it up Wednesday.

Sorry to dent your vanity but the post was not related to you Richard. You are clearly obsessed, weird.

That's only part. You also have to repeat it as many times as possible, even if it doesn't add any value or extra insight to the debate.

Stupid is as stupid does

I made no effort at all my friend, it was posted on a thread. I can kind of see why you have so much pent up anger, it's understandable. Parents eh!

You could check if you were so inclined I guess. I imagine in answer to the first part of the question it would be none? I admire your efforts of twisting it around though, who made the first reference to the other in this thread? I'll leave you in peace Richard, I can see I'm getting under your skin.

You are obsessed. Stalker.

Secrets of his success, tactics, team motivational techniques, succesful transfer strategies?

You do see a lot of top managers slaughtering individual players through the public media. You could be on to something there.

Has Hughes been sacked?

Adkins clearly felt Fox was not up to the job hence our pursuit of a replacement LB. It would seem a joint effort between Adkins and Les Reeds team to identify targets and for NC to seal the deal so I'm not clear as to why you are pointing the finger at Adkins.

He didn't have a lot of alternative options. For whatever reason we did not acquire an LB during the summer and he clearly felt that Shaw was not ready at that point. Your proposal would have been.......?

Didn't the first one get melted down?

I believe it could be true. Someone from the Chelsea Board told little Dicky.

I had a chuckle when browsing through Skysports last night and came across the Pompey v LO game. Clicked on the 'team lineups' where they show the pics of the players in their relative playing positions to find only 1(?) of them wearing Portsmouth kit and one player (a centre-half) with no picture at all. Stating the obvious but they are in as much mess on the pitch as off it. http://www1.skysports.com/football/live/match/262912/teams

It's a genuine question, what are we going to do? It's been discussed ad infinitum on several threads, in large by the same few posters with two schools of thought: - the Club is the devil incarnate or - there are unknown business reasons why they chose to withhold payment You have posted the same key points of your view time and time again. You have been asked time and time again what the end goal is from your side and yet you don't seem able to provide an answer to such a simple question. We could, of course keep discussing the topic but where will that get us as it can be summarised as above.

What shall we do now that we are armed with this information?