egg

Yep.

Yep. This bias talk is ridiculous.

Sure has. Positioning, pace, strong. Looks excellent.

Our midfield is looking OK tonight. Great there from Salisu, again.

Exactly. His leg was there from the good tackle. Absolutely ridiculous.

Conversant perhaps, but tolerant seemingly not. Not sure why anyone would be bothered about it.

Behave. It's no bad thing that some of you get educated.

That's one assumption. If you're right, there's no transparency though. If var is to stay, do it rugby style so it's clear and obvious what they think is clear and obvious.

I get that Duck, but he won the ball, and didn't follow through cos his leg was there from winning the ball. Sure, shite defending, but poor decision.

Don't think so. Fucking ridiculous.

Wow. Got the ball. Not a follow through as his leg was naturally there from winning the ball. Appalling decision.

With Stephens at RB? Makes more sense than Stephens at LB. That's assuming it's a 4.

Yep, I think it's a possibility. Gulp.

Me neither. I'm guessing it's either a 4 with Stephens at LB where Castagne will destroy him, or a 3 with someone (Redmond?!?) at left wing back.

There seems a clear case to answer here. Sensible decision.

Both had awful luck, Seager especially. After his injuries, he went to Havant & Waterlooville where they thought he'd do well but a close family member got very ill and it hit him hard. I was told that he still had something but it wasn't to be. McQueen's situation sounds like he has other injuries flowing from his surgeries which aren't sorting themselves out. Real shame for him.

Sad news for the lad. Hard to imagine where his head will be at and I wish him well.

Tropical

Just looked it up, yep. Didn't realise that, thought he was just a conspiracy loon.

Fantasy

Yeah. "Exciting update" with an exclamation mark or two would have filled me with hope for the lad. Let's see, but fingers crossed for him.

I never saw him play, any good?

Daft to link doing up a flat up and giving out billions of pounds of moody covid contracts. Completely different things, and seeing one as the same as the other is silly. I wouldn't seek to suggest Boris has integrity, he's as dodgy as they come, but a bit of perspective is needed about this issue.

Political parties take donations, and if some of that finds itself into renovations or general party contributions, I'm not sure that it matters. If it finds its way to the former, it's a saving to the tax payer. We see it differently, but for me, this isn't a big issue.

Possibly, Starmer is a bright lad and often approaches PMQ,s as if it's cross examination. Boris is so dishonest its highly possible that Starmer will trip him up at some point.