StrangelyBrown

Not sure if believe hoedt is anything other than incompetence by Hughes. He's been playing long for weeks before finally the penny dropped. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

This is absolutely spot on and why Hughes should be gone Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

Easy peasy. Unless your name is Mark Hughes.... Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

McCarthy Cedric Yoshi vestergard targett Romeu hoj Jwp Armstrong Redmond Ings/Gabbi Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

For all the people who thought we should give Hughes more time, are you still thinking the same? I don't see anything improving Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

I was firmly in the he "earned the opportunity having kept us up" camp, but what is clear to me is that Hughes doesn't have any ideas to move us forwards. In fact, despite plenty of evidence against some of his selections he continues to pick players who are either crap or haven't got the character to up their game when things get tough. As an absolute minimum I expect a manager to react to what is going on in a game and should be capable of identifying: - Players who aren't paying well or aren't up to it - A lack of leadership on the pitch - A system that isn't working - A change in the opposition's tactics For me none of this is happening. A change is needed, but not until something is done about Les and Ralph. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

Long, no ings or gabbiadini. Hughes has lost the plot. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

I'd argue that if you compare one team against the other you would pick half of our players and half of the other team in a lot of cases. I think the problem is one of leadership both on and off the field. With a couple of leaders in our side and a better manager we would be a very different side Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

I don't think the side is the problem. Compare us with individual sides outside the top 6 how many of each side would get into ours? Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

Looking at this differently do you honestly think we won't be bottom 6 after 12 games? Sent from my Lenovo TB-X304F using Tapatalk

Positives: hoj is playing his best football in a saints shirt, Redmond looks a lot better this year, ings seems to know how to play upfront and knows where the goal is, westergaard looks like a decent player and McCarthy looks good. Negatives: long continues to make a living as a professional headless chicken, Cedric looks poor, we lack any character when the going gets tough, tactical changes are mind boggling, we have 2 incredibly slow centre backs and consequently are vulnerable to pace, we've not won games we should win. Most importantly Hughes doesn't seem to know how to make it better. 3/10 Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

We have consistency; we are consistently underperforming, consistently dropping points we shouldn't, consistently playing a championship level striker who runs about a bit, consistently playing 2 centre halves who have no pace whatsoever, consistently playing a right back who has struggled for form over the last year, .... I'm sure we'll consistently play 442 under Hughes and consistently get over run in midfield when we lose momentum and hughes will consistently do the wrong thing to address the issues. How is that consistency working out for us? Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

Dismal stuff in the second half. Didn't look up for it in the slightest. Can only blame the manager for that. **** substitutions didn't really change anything for the better. Hughes needs to up his game, but sadly I think he's too far behind the times. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

Hughes has lost this game for us by not addressing our loss of momentum. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

The answer is never Steven Davis ffs Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

I meant... This... Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

This... Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

Long ffs Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

For me it depends who they are playing with. I rated Stephens more than Yoshida as a partner to Van Dijk, but I wouldn't want Hoedt and Stephens playing together in a million years. For me assuming number 1 is Vestergaard Yoshida Stephens Bednarek And I'd never play Hoedt with Vestergaard.

I'm pretty sure managers have been given some freedom to get their own people in that hasn't involved the black box... Which probably explains some of the dross we've had to put up with e.g. Martina, pied, Elia, carillo, ... from your list I'm pretty sure Pelle and clasie would have been black box signings, but I hardly think Pelle was a disaster. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

What a great performance!!!!!! ****ing brilliant!!!! Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

Yeeeeeessssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

Completely agree with this. None are good enough and yet we have been a defensive side for the last 2 years... It defies all sense Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

Lol. 2 teams of non-defending attackless wonders.... The Southampton way, we plod on [emoji3] Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk

At some point we need to attack the opposition. 4-3-3 for me, but with a narrow midfield supported by the full backs stepping up when we attack and the wings falling back into a 5 when we defend --------------------mccarthy-------------------- Cedric---stephens---yoshida---bertrand ----------------------romeu---------------------- -------------lemina--------davis------------- Redmond-------austin-------------sims Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk