-
Posts
18,011 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Lord Duckhunter
-
Britain's Next Top Prime Minister - Labour Leadership Election 2020.
Lord Duckhunter replied to CB Fry's topic in The Lounge
Apologies. I should have said “most lefties”. I wouldn’t let your comrades know those views, you’ll be labelled right wing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Britain's Next Top Prime Minister - Labour Leadership Election 2020.
Lord Duckhunter replied to CB Fry's topic in The Lounge
What a load of old pony. Corbyn is an anti Semite who attends wreath laying ceremonies for terrorists & takes money from a regime that chucks gays off buildings. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Britain's Next Top Prime Minister - Labour Leadership Election 2020.
Lord Duckhunter replied to CB Fry's topic in The Lounge
Pony. Luckily we’ve still got them here. 2 of my kids went & 2 didn’t. The 2 that went had a far far superior eduction and there’s a noticeable difference in how employers react to their cv. There’s absolutely no comparison. It wasn’t long ago either, my youngest left school last year. Lefties have always been the same, wanting to deny others the education they and their offspring have received. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Britain's Next Top Prime Minister - Labour Leadership Election 2020.
Lord Duckhunter replied to CB Fry's topic in The Lounge
Or “millionaire hypocrite who studied at a grammar school but wants to deny your children that opportunity”. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
Britain's Next Top Prime Minister - Labour Leadership Election 2020.
Lord Duckhunter replied to CB Fry's topic in The Lounge
Clam down Boomer. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
Britain's Next Top Prime Minister - Labour Leadership Election 2020.
Lord Duckhunter replied to CB Fry's topic in The Lounge
No ****ing chance....... #stilldontgetit Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
Britain's Next Top Prime Minister - Labour Leadership Election 2020.
Lord Duckhunter replied to CB Fry's topic in The Lounge
According to Nick Watt on Newsnight, Nandy was impressive at hustings tonight, even impressed lefties. He also claims nervousness from Wrong-Daily camp as she bombs. She also gave Jezza 10 out of 10 when asked to mark him by ITN........... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
City taking the **** tonight.carry on like this, it’ll be 6 or 7. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
Britain's Next Top Prime Minister - Labour Leadership Election 2020.
Lord Duckhunter replied to CB Fry's topic in The Lounge
Having joined The Tories to vote for a Brexiter PM. I was thinking of doing the same with labour. I thought Lady Nugee a north London snob, committed remoaner, part of the metropolitan elite who had more chance of going to the moon in a shoe box, than reconnecting with the Red wall voters, would be worth chucking a few quid to elect. However, I’ll save my money as it looks like the membership chumps are going to vote for their very own version. Starmer, the man behind the Brexit policy disaster, liberal metropolitan to his finger tips, the charisma of a damp flannel, and the walking, talking example of exactly why the working man has abandoned The Party. Mind you, having a penis may work against him as some will want to tick the diversity box. Jess Philips will also be worth a laugh, as she’s unhinged. I just hope the debates are televised. That’ll be highly amusing.... As someone right of centre, I’d fear Nandy the most. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
Fifa want the on field referee to use the pitch side monitor, and therefore the on field ref will be the decision maker. For some reason the premier league or the PGMO (don’t know which) don’t want to follow that protocol, and VAR makes the calls for all Premier league games. The FA are obviously following the protocol for their cup competition. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
This is my argument. If you’re going to have VAR making line decisions, then it needs to make every line decision. Cricket has appeals & Umpire’s call, but line decisions are based on fact , with no margin of error. It would be bizarre for cricket to have no balls as umpire call, yet run outs as a binary choice. Yet people appear to want offside subject to a margin of error, or Lino call, but whether it’s a pen or free kick as a factual decision. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
I was advised to get an iMac & took the plunge. 3 years later it’s still as quick & running as well as the day I installed it. The kids moaned a bit because they were used to windows, and the old lady was useless with it for a long time, it can be a bit of a struggle if you use windows at work a lot. But value for money, I’ve absolutely no complaints. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
There are times between games when I fully agree with the OP. The club is basically an international football side based in Southampton, The Premier league just an international league based in England. Hell, I haven’t even lived in Southampton for over 45 years and have no relatives that do. For various reasons, too numerous to mention, matchdays aren’t as good as they used to be. I sometimes even nearly convince myself that the result doesn’t matter that much anymore. However, once at the game the same old feelings just overcome you. The joy at Chelsea, the final whistle New Year’s Day, the raw emotion at those moments is still there. Football, bloody hell. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
The Keeler thing is pretty good, despite being too long. They seem obsessed with stretching things for box sets. Joanne Whalley was great in the film, & the chick playing Keeler is in the same class. The Rice-Davis bird is worth watching as well. More like this and the licence fee may become worth it. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
Sounds a right load of pony. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
What, offside goals being disallowed? What’s the alternative, an official deciding if it’s far enough offside. Having watched the officials today, no thanks.
-
The complaints aren’t about subjective decisions. People are complaining that VAR is ruling players in offside positions are offside and therefore offside goals are being disallowed. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
Stop ****ing moaning, you only need to have been to 3 games to get a ticket. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
They’re not changing the offside rule. You can’t argue with a fact, those players were offside. The only argument is whether the offside rule should be strictly enforced or not. Personally, I don’t understand why it wouldn’t be. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
You’re wrong... Most of the fuss is over correct decisions. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
No, just the offside ones... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
Do you really believe that had the Wolves goal stood despite being offside, Klopp would have just accepted it, said “it’s within the margin of error”. If it was as close a title race as last season’s, you really think allowing an offside goal will be uncontroversial. What about other hairline factual decisions, should they be subject to your margin of error. VAR wasn’t brought in for clear and obvious errors only, it was also there to establish facts. Clear and obvious applies to subjective decisions. Whether the ball crossed the line, whether the foul was inside the box or out, whether the ball touched the goal scorers hand, whether a player is offside is not subjective and therefore clear and obvious doesn’t apply. A Pandora’s box has been opened & if anyone thinks tinkering with factual decisions and allowing offside goals because they’re close, is going to make this go away they’re very much mistaken. At the moment the sense of un fairness felt by the aggrieved party is minimised by the fact the goal was offside. Wait until a side loses a big game by an offside goal. Had that been a cup final Sat & Palaces offside goal had stood, costing us a 2-1 defeat, I doubt you’d be quite so happy about it. Particularly when the technology proving it was offside was there to be used. This ain’t going away, so if there’s going to be controversy, I’d rather it was over a correct decision, than a wrong one. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
You might not, but others on here do claim that. Not only the most skilful, but “easily” the most skilful...there’s alosthe claim that other players agree with this assessment, but no names have been forthcoming. Here’s a question for you. Do you think he’ll become a first team regular? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
You can’t un-invent the technology. Within minutes of an offside goal being allowed, the watching audience, everyone in the ground with access to texts will be aware that the goal was off side. What do you think Jose, or Klopp or the clubs supporters are going to say “it looked onside, so we’ll accept that offside goal costing us a champions league place”. You could have a situation where a goal is denied by a toe nail when the technology deems the ball didn’t cross the line, but someone offside by a larger margin scores the winner up the other end . You think nobody will bat an eyelid? Dream on... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
4 different managers have only used him as a bit part player, have they got an agenda? Agenda, what a load of pony. Don’t rate Boufal and it’s part of an agenda. I just hope the people claiming he’s easily the leagues most skilful player, are only doing so on here. They’d be laughed out of every boozer in the land if they claimed that in public. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk