Lord Duckhunter

Oh come on, you must be able to see the funny side. I certainly can lol. Btw, it is pretty irresponsible to be smoking in airport toilets in this day and age. Any sign of smoke, or smoke alarms could cause a panic. Perhaps you should get one of those electric ones.

They apologised and said they were only doing their job, perfectly reasonable IMO. What more did you want, a meeting with the head honcho ala Plebgate?

What's your problem with the police Viking, they do a bloody tough job and do it well. Yes, there maybe a few rotten apples, but less than in most jobs. I dont get this country sometimes, we honour and respect the army, god help anyone who dares to slag off a nurse, doctor or teacher, yet the police are fair game for all sorts of weird and wonderful nonsense.

I've played sky and virgin off against each other a couple of times. Martin Lewis had an ex sky employee lifting the lid on the deals you can get. He gave the rundown , the times to call and the months you'll get better deals. Now is a good time because there's a lot of cancellations after Xmas. He said they have x amount of deals , so go to them in the middle of the month. Too early and they keep deals back so there's not so many, too late and they'll be gone. Bloke reckoned the retention deals and writtern into their margins. He said insist you really love it , but just can't afford it. I made out my mrs was pregnant once and therefore was only getting statutory maternity pay and we needed to cut back. They gave be a great deal for a year, to stay. After a year I played them off against virgin and they matched the deal. Im still with virgin but struck it lucky when one of my mates sister got a job with them. She had 10 mates rates deals to give away, so provided we have everything and all tv channels we get it for half price. Just shows that their margins are high, because any staff discount would only be at cost at the very lowest level.

Di Cannio was a football person, as was Joe ****ing kinnear

I thought it was the CPS not the police that decide if there is enough evidence. They obviously decided it wasn't "pointless".

Depends on what the level of investment was and what the ambition of the club was. If we're going to have the level of finance of a Norwich, wba or Fulham , id rather have Nigel than some of the chumps who get linked with every premiership vacancy. If Pardew can do ok at Newcastle , then nigel could do ok . Personally, if the money went I'd have a look at Eddie Howe, or someone of that ilk, but I wouldn't be unhappy with nigel.

Adkins isn't as good a manager as MP,.but he's not some sort of 4-4-2 Fat Sam clone. We played some decent stuff under him and would have continued to do so. If we need to cut our cloth accordingly, I'd rather have him back than Pardew.

I have traced many mates I worked with and used to play football with through it. Met up with a scouser I hadn't seen for 23 years at anfield game last season through it. Don't add mates I see regularly or work people and also avoid ex chicks or totty I used to fancy. As a tool for keeping in touch with people abroad or living away its great.

That other swivel eyed right wing loon Tony Benn is very anti EU as well. Its not about wanting to return to the empire, or sending johhny foreigner home , its about British people deciding levels of immigration. Something that can never happen until we leave the EU.

So in a thread about whether its racist to worry about immigration, you link the BNP to UKIP and then make the pathtic and ignorant point that its "easy" to link Tories to nazis. And then go on to add that people who worry " want their cake and eat it". Well done in one glorious post you've proved yet again how lefties shut down debate by lies and slurs. Its what always happens the left warn about discussing this sensibly and avoiding inflammatory language, before doing just that themselves.

There you've done it again, trying to link UKIP with the BNP. The closer comparison in the run up to the EU elections would be The Greens, who polled similarly in the past. However, that wont sit with your "UKIP are racist" agenda. UKIP is the only party that bans people who were previously members of the BNP, by the way. All parties have loons, from Diane Abbot saying West Indian mothers want the best for their children and white people cant understand it, to Tories dressing up as Nazi's. Lib/Dems and Macshane going to clinck and Hughes running the most blatant anti gay campaign ever, despite batting for the other side himself. The establishment want to portray anyone who has concerns about immigration as bigots, from Mrs Duffy to Nigel Farage. As I said earlier, what is more racist. Treating people differently on the basis of their nationality, or treating everbody the same?

Sounds like mob rule to me. Just because a few lefties organise incidents to basically close down free speech (if you believe these are just spontaneous displays from ordinary Joe's , you're deluded) does not make him hated. How do you explain his poll rating's compared to Cleggys and Millibands. Personally, I cant wait for the European elections when he sticks it to the man. Coupled with Ceggys bunch of Euro loons getting wiped out, the European elections are going to shake up the establishment.

I bumped into somebody at Fulham who works at the club and I hadn't seen for ages. He claimed the day after NC left some office staff bought in party whistles and were blowing them in celebration. Don't know if it's true, but he's not the type to make things up. I'm 50/50 on that one, but he also told me that the happiest people around are Mr & Mrs Les Read, particularly Mrs Read who hated him. Now I don't even know if Read is married, but I do know that this guy knows Read, that's 100%.

Who is to say it's a male, it could be a devil women with evil on her mind.

http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php? Try this forum, I got of a speeding charge with their help. Even had people drafting letters on there and got some great advise. I believe they do parking as well as speeding.

Another baseless "fact" based on your political opinions. The only way to judge what people think of party leaders is opinion polls and Farage polls higher than Clegg or Milliband. You may think that Farage is a bigoted buffoon but believe it or not that doesn't mean "people" do. I think Ed Balls is an incompetent numpty, that the Green party are a bunch of loons and that Ed Milliband is trying to con the public, perhaps I'll post that "people" view them the same as me. I'm sure there are people out there that agree, but that doesn't make it true for me to post "that's why people think Ed Milliband is a con man".

I wonder who the beloved pop star helping yewtree officers with their enquires is. Somebody who likes young ones, no doubt.

Adam's a cert if he keeps playing like this. Rickie , im 50/50 on this, depends on carrol really. I reckon woy prefers Carroll and the past couple of seasons lamberts struggled towards the end. Osvaldo going has given him a boost, but reckon he'll need to whack a few in . Jrod has done fantastic after that soul destroying debut. Must be a real feather in his cap that he's worked harder and got over it well. Depends on injuries really, all he can hope is he gets the call for the next frendly and impresses . I did think clyne was in with a squeak, but chambers form could do for his England hopes. Shaw won't go unless one of cole or Baines is injured. Cork, no chance.

I think people are forgetting just how good some of lawrie's sides were. Guys like Bally, KK and Shilts weren't just the best players of their era but in the case of Bally and Shilts in particular , amongst the best Englishmen that have ever played the game. Add to the mix people like Dave Armstrong,Mark Wright , and not forgetting the greatest saints player MC. Lawries sides were also entertaining and the youngsters were on a par with todays. I'm not deriding the modern side as they're certainly the best since lawries day, but man, there were some fantastic football played back then. Its hard to judge older era players against todays, but Ball and Williams trumps Morgan and Cork , Shilts is head and shoulders above AB, Mick would walk into this side. Im not sure who from this era would get into lawries best side, maybe Lovren and Adam the way he's played this season. Lets just hope we can get a few more years out of most of the guys, they win something and go on to become even better then Lawrie' s . Its certainly the best feeling being a saints fan since the great man left .

Typical of the "it's not racist to discuss immigration..............but" brigade. Make up complete and utter nonsense that the "typical " UKIP supporter doesn't want darkies in the country. UKIP actually want to treat everybody equally regardless of nationality. It is the people who scream "racist" that want to treat Europeans ( who are in fhe vast majority white ) differently than Africans and Asians.

The only person on this thread that is not having a proper debate is you. The only person using emotive language is you. It is so typical of your side of the arguement , your line seems to be " you can discuss it without being racist, provided you agree with me" . Of course you have to throw in the obligatory Daily Mail remark. In fact the only things missing from your leftie handbook of discussing immigration is some facts around how good immigration has been for the country and how hardly any immigrants claim benefits. I often watch QT playing "immigration bingo" awaiting the standard responses and cries of "it's not racist to discuss immigration......but". My view is very simple, every immigrant that gets a job, particularly in the minimum wage sector, it is one less job available for a British person. That seems to me to be an indisputable fact. Therefore, our government should decide the level of immigration into this country and the rules around who can work and what skill base or independent wealth they should have. Therefore if the British people feel that too much has taken place, or indeed too little , and this is having a negative effect on growth and prosperity then the British people can throw the governing party out. I apply this to all races equally, unlike the Labour party who do distinguish between races and nationality. Surely the UKIP postion of work permits for all nationals is less racist than a points system for Africans,Pakistanis,and Asians and nothing at all for Germans,Irish and French nationals. If ukips position was that Canadians, Australians and new Zealanders could come and go as they please, but johhny foreigners from India, Sri Lanka and Gambia had a points system imposed on them, im sure you'll soon be starting a thread about it, with a link to the daily mail thrown in.

Enjoyable day out, the best London trio imo. Decent pubs, bricklayers,coat and badge and jolly gardener the pick of them (and we did a few). Downside was the trains were too ****ing packed and the whetherspoons opposite station was a joke, **** I thought Mrs duck was slow with the old breakfast, but they were Danny Fox slow. Shame if they go down, so much better day out than the new grounds and dumps like Upton park. Hope they stay uo, will make a nice Aug bank holiday game.

I don't know if he's a troll, but he's a boring twt.

I reckon what ever the weather patterns over the next 10 years it'll be down to man. If the rain fall is higher than the previous 10 years it'll be down to man. If its lower, it'll be man again. If it stays the same it'll be a "pause". Same with temp, up man, down man, same pause. Everything is down to man, and the con is you can't take a contradictory position. When people like Jim Jones said the world was going to end on x date and it didn't, he loses credibility. When All Gore says by 2013 the north pole will be ice free and the sea levels would rise 20 feet, the establishment don't go to him and say "so Al, what a crock of sheite" they say " we need to redouble our efforts". Perhaps a tree hugger could post a climate change experts scientific evaluation of where we'll be in the next 10 years, we could then close this thread and comeback in a decade and see if he was right. If he was , I'll freely admit I was wrong, but to just bla,e whatever the weather is on man is just nonsense. There was climate change before man, I believe.