-
Posts
9,622 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Dark Munster
-
I was apparently watching a different cup final, where we had a perfectly good goal disallowed, and outplayed them for much of the match.
-
Only if they're stupid enough to sack Pulis. His teams never get relegated.
-
I think at the time the players also loved Wigley and Gray.
-
Too many coincidences. Six previous appointments have seen his clubs do disastrously, and since he came here we're heading the same way. He's not solely to blame of course, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to put 2 and 2 together and deduce that he's not up to it.
-
Dear Scotland, Please sign him up permanently. He's even better than Burley, honest. We won't even ask for compensation this time. Love, Saints
-
Scraping the bottom of the barrel. Oh, just like what we did.
-
Maybe that's because the front man (Pelle) and Mane were sold?
-
Pure speculation, but I'm guessing a number of players pushed for Puel to go, but also insisted their buddy Black stayed. Hopefully Reed has learnt from this mistake, and when he does sack MoPe he clears out the deadwood coaching staff too (Black and Watson in particular).
-
Maybe. But it wasn't bad, either.
-
Me too. I think his team suffered playing at that God-awful soulless stadium. If West Ham want to swap managers I wouldn't say no.
-
He inherited a mess and did very well to keep us up. His points record during his brief stay was very respectable, more so considering the weak squad he had. But he was Crouch's hire, so when the ruddy cheeked bastard returned he wasn't going to let Nige stay on. Add that to the list of sackings of decent managers followed by disastrous replacements. Nicholl -> Br*nf**t Luggy -> Wigley Pearson -> Poortvliet Puel -> MoPe
-
Sacking a decent manager and replacing him with someone worse is always a bad idea. We did it with Nicholl -> Br*nf**t and Luggy -> Wigley. It was a disaster those two times, and it is looking like history is repeating itself.
-
We could do worse. Good shout. Always liked Nasty Nige, and I think he could be the perfect bastard for us. Plus he did superbly setting up Leicester for that incredible season (especially in the sports science department).
-
He is nowhere near a Puel mark 2, which is an insult to a decent manager. He is a Br*nf**t, Wigley, Gray, mark 2 (take your pick).
-
I thought from the thread title that this was going to be your farewell post.
-
It does appear that player power is now a major problem. I think it was the main reason Claude was forced out. Maybe the players want a nice pal like Eric Black in charge (competence be damned). We need a seasoned manager who wont take any shit from them. And Black and Watson out.
-
It's stronger than the one last year that finished 8th and outplayed Utd in a cup final. Anyway, we need an experienced manager who commands the players' respect and wont take shit from any of them (loathe him or hate him, Koeman had that). And also someone who will immediately bring in his own replacements for Black and Watson.
-
I think you'll find it would be Spurs and their scouts who are mainly responsible for that. I can think of many ways to describe someone who walks out on us a year or so into his contract to take up a job with Spurs, but "top bloke" is certainly not one of them. Anyone who wins La Liga ahead of Real Madrid and Barcelona (at their Messi peak) is a world class manager. If the tosspot MP does that I'll call him world class.
-
You mean in response to the same verbatim crud about Puel.
-
Steady on. Not if they're the manager of Spurs (or P*mp*y).
-
Indeed. I'll never forgive him for selling Mane, Pelle, and Big Vic. And for getting Austin and VVD injured. And turning Fonte's head and selling him in January when we were already short at the back.
-
I don't know about 90%, but yes a significant number wanted him gone. I think word on the street it was a number of unhappy players who were the main reason he was sacked (with maybe the fans being the straw on the camel's back).
-
Apparently that wasn't good enough last season.