Window Cleaner

Ah well, post on #I am Munich, light up monuments in the colours of the German flag and await next weeks episode I guess.

you'll get people asking you if you've actually ever seen him play for posting stuff like that. Some just seem to refuse to accept that some players aren't destined for great careers at Saints and will be moved on because they are of little or no use to us and cost a lot of money for very little contribution...

Vince annoys me, he's obviously got what it takes technique wise but he gets to 30 or 40 and then does something completely stupid which you'd castigate an U16 for doing. Then again I'm a spoilt Marshall (Roy not Malcolm although he wasn't dusty with the bat either), Richards, Greenidge, Turner, Jesty, Gower, Smith, Smith type throwback.

As I said the other day, they're not desperate to sell and he's not desperate to move, certainly not to Watford. He's looking at a Top 10 in Europe Club, he'd probably be about as interested in Saints as he evidently is about Watford. No club is going to offer them mega buck until he plays again anyway, then there's the ANC.

Well Vince has done his prospective test career no good again today. Same flawed judgement, same stupid shot as usual. He's got the shots, he just doesn't always have the judgement necessary to use them at the highest level.

It never has been all that great.

Another fine example of West ham's scatter-gun recrutement policy. Try to sign everybody and hope to get at least a couple of half-decent players in the end.

Probably are in Leicester and Bindippaland..

Because gone are the days when relegated teams couldn't afford to keep their better players if they didn't get decent offers for them.

So in fact whilst the "abusive posters" (not that I'd recognise who that may be) are here and users don't pay because of that, the site makes more money out of them.

On Juventus's part it's just plain common sense. 100 odd million for Pogba and 35 million for Sissoko to replace him. Less salary as well no doubt. Both have their off days and high days so I really don't see 70 odd million quids worth of difference between them.

Wouldn't know, don't look at them . Don't see the problem really, it's a free world, each user can choose to use one site or another. If one doesn't work well use that that does. The cost of membership of this particular site is £5, it always has been so if you don't want to pay, fine then don't but quit complaining if you don't get the same service as those that do.

Anyway I've sent him a PM for you.

I think everybody has the possibility to contact the Admin independently of the PM system.

Really not holding out for those last few overs yesterday has dealt a blow to our survival hopes. With 5 points each for Hants and Surrey we'd have every chance of overtaking them when the games even out. With 16 for them and nowt for us that changes everything. Still we need a win and all will look rosier but with the bowling as it is and test calls as they are.......................

I've been on the site since day 1 and a half and apart from the rough patch when the servers couldn't handle the load on match days I don't ever remember any great problem. Once upon a time virtually all regular contributors paid their 5 quid but now that seems to have been largely abandoned in favour of freebooting. So if you're a second class poster it's kind of normal that you get second class service on occasions isn't it!!

Absolutely,

Looks like we may well need some new sub drivers as well.

Woah there Neddys. An unsustained post that Newcastle are "in for Targett" and now we're getting a few of end of the world scenarios as if it was gospel and that the club will accept whatever it is that they're offering. Monk isn't the most reliable purveyor of insider information really and doesn't even say whether the club are taking any eventual offer seriously....

He doesn't want to stay there, novelty has obviously worn off. Ah that was last week, now he says he does, obviously got more money somehow.

Well I'd suppose that those 4 months showed that he has something to offer at least for Boro. I'd also expect the figure to be overquoted as well.

Sod it, lost by an innings and 13 runs. Last 4 wickets lost for about 20. .

Aie Aie Aie going to be a sticky last few overs, cruising and then lost 2 wickets in an over. Still we'll overtake them soon so the overs remaining will diminish by 2 because of the innings change right ?

As long as the rules are uniformly applied and not open to interpretation differently from ref to ref it's OK.

He doesn't seem to mention that in the interview he gave yesterday. Not at all.