Baird of the land

Unless he's been giving contradictory statements to different medias, this is very clear and any lambert deal would make Krueger look foolish.

Others are reporting it to be agreed at 4m with talk of a Saturday medical. If there's a 3m gap in valuations there's no way there would be a medical arranged. Maybe it is bs as I originally thought, who knows.

Said they will involve new manager and that is why there have been no sales.

The rumours were 7m in January which seemed the level that close to too good to turn down. 4m from Liverpool is derisory.

If the board are selling him dirt cheap that's their fault. Lambert's feelings on issue should be inconsequential to the hard nosed business died.

If the peanuts fee is correct I assume they'll be hoping their board keep buying our players because if we're willing to sell him for that imagine the scarily low fees we'll accept for the rest of the squad.

Embarassing. Liverpool will be laughing their heads off at what a soft touch we are if it turns out to be correct.

If the lambert thing happens Krueger will have allowed himself to appear to be a buffoon a day later. If the peanuts selling him for is true its deeply worrying. No sane club in prem would sell their star striker dirt cheap.

Saints have paid them well and helped get them international recognition. The club should feel no hesistation in blocking the moves if it damages saints.

Of course you can deny their moves if it isn't in the interest of saints. We're not a charity or Liverpool b.

If they pay 7/8m up front I have no problem with him getting opportunity to play for him hometown club. If they've bid the derisory 4m then I have a great problem and I'll spit feathers watching him play for them.

If true(which I doubt) it is an embarrassingly low fee. Would make the board appear to be a bunch of two faced soft touch imbeciles.

Maybe saints have an inside scoop that sky is going bust and there will be no more 80m pay days to come. Can't remember a top half club selling more than one of their star players. So the talk of 5/6 players leaving is nonsense, especially as you say the remaining 5/6 first teamers wouldn't hang about either if any club ever did that.

Don't worry the conspiracy theorists here will blame that on board incompetence.

Never heard the term odd player being used to describe selling 5/6 of first team. Must be a new dictionary word meaning bs.

If true assume they are fishing to see if they can see if they can get him dirt cheap. Be amazed if Liverpool are really willing to spelunking 7/8m upfront for a 32 yr old.

So what, if Liverpool don't meet our valuation we reject that request. He's a professional under contract not an amateur footballer.

He's under contract so yes we can stop him. Especially since Liverpool have shown every sign of trying to pinch our players dirt cheap if the quoted bids for others have any substance to them.

There's no official confirmation there's been a bid. There's some dodgy Facebook material We've only scumbag journos who are peddling the story that this bid has been rejected Then as a club we are perfectly within our rights to block the move if any offer isn't massively over our valuation.

Bbc really has become the scum of the earth with no journalism standards. So we're selling 3 World Cup players to them for a packet of peanuts, how nice for them.

If the club are directly telling Blackmore this, why don't they just stick a message on the official twitter account. Still bs IMO. If true, reject as probably back door means to try and prise ads away.

Or standard British press hack opportunism of a cheap twitter hoax to sell papers and get eyes glued to TV screens.

Really you expect the media to report the truth it's much more for for them to make up a lie that has just the right ring of believability in it to get people hooked. Find it funny that they act so unscrupulously and yet are in such a state over the notion of a duchess' butt cheek.

They are testing the water to see what lie is more believable. Filthy bunch of jackals the lot of them, trying to fill time in the columns till the World Cup with nonsense.

Clearly not true IMO. If it was 4m would be a terrible deal. We lose a key 1st xi player for tiny fee for which we'd never be able to buy a player of similar calibre. Add ons for a 32 yr old are a meaningless joke.