Baird of the land

If we fold and let them bully us into selling dirt cheap, they'll keep coming back and beating us up for our bargains. Bloody Swansea extracted 15m for the awful Joe Allen. 4m for england international is an utter joke

Reason Boruc didn't do the lap of honour(wave goodbye) after last game was he was told he was the only 1st team player staying at saints.

I find the whole Luke to MU thing bizarre. Other than a wage rise, it seems a crazy move. They've re-signed the 1st choice france left back so he's not even guaranteed to play every week. They aren't in the champions league and may not get back into the champions league given how far off the pace they were last season.

Sorry but no we shouldn't be selling him dirt cheap as reported.

Swansea made them pay 15m for utterly mediocre Allen. Not surprised they want our entire squad at the rock bottom sale prices being quoted.

No wonder we weren't keen on dyke's b team idea. Our plan is to sell the a team and play the b team in the prem apparently.

Disappointing if true. Is that a more attractive job than a prem one or did we never even enquire about him.

Don't get why koeman's such short odds personally. I don't particularly like the fact he's bounced around constantly. Still would much prefer yakin.

Dodd and Williams were probably sacked before Liverpool could poach them

Unless he's been giving contradictory statements to different medias, this is very clear and any lambert deal would make Krueger look foolish.

Others are reporting it to be agreed at 4m with talk of a Saturday medical. If there's a 3m gap in valuations there's no way there would be a medical arranged. Maybe it is bs as I originally thought, who knows.

Said they will involve new manager and that is why there have been no sales.

The rumours were 7m in January which seemed the level that close to too good to turn down. 4m from Liverpool is derisory.

If the board are selling him dirt cheap that's their fault. Lambert's feelings on issue should be inconsequential to the hard nosed business died.

If the peanuts fee is correct I assume they'll be hoping their board keep buying our players because if we're willing to sell him for that imagine the scarily low fees we'll accept for the rest of the squad.

Embarassing. Liverpool will be laughing their heads off at what a soft touch we are if it turns out to be correct.

If the lambert thing happens Krueger will have allowed himself to appear to be a buffoon a day later. If the peanuts selling him for is true its deeply worrying. No sane club in prem would sell their star striker dirt cheap.

Saints have paid them well and helped get them international recognition. The club should feel no hesistation in blocking the moves if it damages saints.

Of course you can deny their moves if it isn't in the interest of saints. We're not a charity or Liverpool b.

If they pay 7/8m up front I have no problem with him getting opportunity to play for him hometown club. If they've bid the derisory 4m then I have a great problem and I'll spit feathers watching him play for them.

If true(which I doubt) it is an embarrassingly low fee. Would make the board appear to be a bunch of two faced soft touch imbeciles.

Maybe saints have an inside scoop that sky is going bust and there will be no more 80m pay days to come. Can't remember a top half club selling more than one of their star players. So the talk of 5/6 players leaving is nonsense, especially as you say the remaining 5/6 first teamers wouldn't hang about either if any club ever did that.

Don't worry the conspiracy theorists here will blame that on board incompetence.

Never heard the term odd player being used to describe selling 5/6 of first team. Must be a new dictionary word meaning bs.

If true assume they are fishing to see if they can see if they can get him dirt cheap. Be amazed if Liverpool are really willing to spelunking 7/8m upfront for a 32 yr old.