Turkish Posted 18 December, 2025 Author Posted 18 December, 2025 12 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: What do you identify as? a complete bellend 1 1
AlexLaw76 Posted 29 December, 2025 Posted 29 December, 2025 Obviously special rules applied, and her court was smaller than his. https://news.sky.com/story/nick-kyrgios-defeats-aryna-sabalenka-to-win-battle-of-the-sexes-tennis-match-13488078
Weston Super Saint Posted 29 December, 2025 Posted 29 December, 2025 36 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: Obviously special rules applied, and her court was smaller than his. https://news.sky.com/story/nick-kyrgios-defeats-aryna-sabalenka-to-win-battle-of-the-sexes-tennis-match-13488078 I assume she was happy to accept 20% less money given that her court was smaller so she had to do less work?
Turkish Posted 29 December, 2025 Author Posted 29 December, 2025 3 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said: Obviously special rules applied, and her court was smaller than his. https://news.sky.com/story/nick-kyrgios-defeats-aryna-sabalenka-to-win-battle-of-the-sexes-tennis-match-13488078 sounds like close fought contest between the womens number 1 and the 671st ranked man.
whelk Posted 29 December, 2025 Posted 29 December, 2025 What’s this got to do with LGBT? Is Kyrgios gay?
Turkish Posted January 1 Author Posted January 1 My sons friend just said his older brother was gay as he was going to to a Minecraft experience in London the world is healing 1
Turkish Posted January 19 Author Posted January 19 (edited) A win for common sense https://www.msn.com/en-gb/society-culture-and-history/gender-and-sexual-identity/nurses-win-huge-battle-after-woke-nhs-made-them-share-changing-room-with-trans-woman/ar-AA1UlxrY Edited January 19 by Turkish 2
benjii Posted January 19 Posted January 19 5 hours ago, Turkish said: A win for common sense https://www.msn.com/en-gb/society-culture-and-history/gender-and-sexual-identity/nurses-win-huge-battle-after-woke-nhs-made-them-share-changing-room-with-trans-woman/ar-AA1UlxrY Most of them look like they might have a cock. 1
pingpong Posted January 19 Posted January 19 11 hours ago, Turkish said: A win for common sense https://www.msn.com/en-gb/society-culture-and-history/gender-and-sexual-identity/nurses-win-huge-battle-after-woke-nhs-made-them-share-changing-room-with-trans-woman/ar-AA1UlxrY What a strange source. I thought msn was a news source not an opinion bank? What i found curious was no mention for the details of the ruling, it made it sound like an outright victory when a lot of the claims were thrown out. 1
ChrisPY Posted January 19 Posted January 19 There once was a poster called pingpong Born with a perfect working dingdong He sliced it right off And Ducky did scoff As pingpong was now a bird. 3
Weston Super Saint Posted January 19 Posted January 19 2 hours ago, pingpong said: What a strange source. I thought msn was a news source not an opinion bank? Which bit of the article is 'opinion' rather than factual?
AlexLaw76 Posted January 19 Posted January 19 3 hours ago, pingpong said: What a strange source. I thought msn was a news source not an opinion bank? What i found curious was no mention for the details of the ruling, it made it sound like an outright victory when a lot of the claims were thrown out. Great result regardless, yes?
pingpong Posted January 21 Posted January 21 (edited) On 19/01/2026 at 21:00, Weston Super Saint said: Which bit of the article is 'opinion' rather than factual? Apart from the missing facts around the details of the ruling, a lot of hyperbole, language like "Incredibly" and "paralysed with fear" for example. Most journalist would use quote marks, or make it clear it was a description from a person, rather than describing an event there is no evidence for as though it is factual. Especially when the ruling found that the claims from the nurses were deeply exaggerated and that they had a personal vendetta against the doctor, who only ever followed the NHS policies. The ruling was against the NHS, not her... Edited January 21 by pingpong All of which is fine by the way, for an opinion piece. My surprise was that I thought msn was just news, but maybe I am a decade or two out of date.
Weston Super Saint Posted January 21 Posted January 21 5 hours ago, pingpong said: Apart from the missing facts around the details of the ruling, a lot of hyperbole, language like "Incredibly" and "paralysed with fear" for example. Most journalist would use quote marks, or make it clear it was a description from a person, rather than describing an event there is no evidence for as though it is factual. Especially when the ruling found that the claims from the nurses were deeply exaggerated and that they had a personal vendetta against the doctor, who only ever followed the NHS policies. The ruling was against the NHS, not her... You do know the article was written by Giles Sheldrick and published in the Daily Express? I assume MSN have just republished it as it was printed / published in the Express rather than writing it themselves?
Turkish Posted March 31 Author Posted March 31 happy international transgender day of visibility everyone!
Weston Super Saint Posted March 31 Posted March 31 45 minutes ago, Turkish said: happy international transgender day of visibility everyone! Who do I complain to? This was not on the calendar Mrs WSS bought for this year! 2
badgerx16 Posted March 31 Posted March 31 (edited) 1 hour ago, Turkish said: happy international transgender day of visibility everyone! There is a transgender person lodging with our next door neighbours. I can confirm that I did in fact see this person this morning. Edited March 31 by badgerx16
Weston Super Saint Posted yesterday at 06:07 Posted yesterday at 06:07 Are we saying that it's now not OK for blokes to compete as women just because they put on a dress and wear some makeup? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/darts/articles/c33lm6d154eo Quote The Darts Regulation Authority has banned transgender women from competing in its women's events with immediate effect. It's hard to keep up with what's in vogue and what isn't these days!
egg Posted yesterday at 14:58 Posted yesterday at 14:58 8 hours ago, Weston Super Saint said: Are we saying that it's now not OK for blokes to compete as women just because they put on a dress and wear some makeup? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/darts/articles/c33lm6d154eo It's hard to keep up with what's in vogue and what isn't these days! No idea mate! That said, I'm not sure why men and women, and anything in between, can't compete together in pastimes like darts or snooker where there's no physical gender advantages.
Weston Super Saint Posted yesterday at 15:24 Posted yesterday at 15:24 25 minutes ago, egg said: No idea mate! That said, I'm not sure why men and women, and anything in between, can't compete together in pastimes like darts or snooker where there's no physical gender advantages. From the article : Quote Sex-based rights charity Sex Matters said "men's physical advantages in darts may be small but they all add up". "Darts is a male-dominated world, played in pubs and clubs, and the top darts players are all men. That's why women need their own tournaments. 1
egg Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, Weston Super Saint said: From the article : That's one opinion, mine is that's bollox. There's no physical reason why a woman can't play darts as well as a man. Ditto snooker. 1
The Kraken Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago No I agree with Weston. It may be a small difference but I think darts is one that’s not quite equal. Snooker I get as an equality, but the 7ft 9in on darts does IMO make a bit of a difference. 1
benjii Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago Not sure snooker is equal either. Hard for a bird to reach some shots if she's short or has massive knockers. If anyone has photos of attractive short ladies with massive knockers trying to bend over tables then I'm happy to conduct further research. 4
Turkish Posted 19 hours ago Author Posted 19 hours ago 2 hours ago, The Kraken said: No I agree with Weston. It may be a small difference but I think darts is one that’s not quite equal. Snooker I get as an equality, but the 7ft 9in on darts does IMO make a bit of a difference. Surely with birds generally being more used to being bent over a table with a long cue near them they’d be at an advantage?
egg Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 hours ago, The Kraken said: No I agree with Weston. It may be a small difference but I think darts is one that’s not quite equal. Snooker I get as an equality, but the 7ft 9in on darts does IMO make a bit of a difference. In what way? Strength isn't a factor. Height doesn't make a difference. Assuming a woman and a man of the same height, where's the gender advantage for the man?
Lighthouse Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago I'm not sure to what extent physical differences play a factor in professional darts. All I do know is that I'd feel a bit embarrassed telling people I was unable to compete athletically with Andy 'The Viking' Fordham; man, woman or otherwise.
hypochondriac Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 15 hours ago, egg said: In what way? Strength isn't a factor. Height doesn't make a difference. Assuming a woman and a man of the same height, where's the gender advantage for the man? A doctor's expert opinion on male advantage in darts: "Male advantage includes greater height, longer limbs, broader shoulders, more muscle mass, and stiffer tendons. These factors enhance reach, stability and throwing mechanics, affecting consistency and precision." Stance and throw. A combination of larger skeleton and advantageous biomechanics that maximise reach and more effective exploitation of forward lean contributes to an advantage for males in throwing mechanics and accuracy. Grip and motor control. Greater hand and arm strength delay fatigue of key muscles involved in release timing, supporting sustained scoring consistency in male players.
Weston Super Saint Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 16 hours ago, Turkish said: Surely with birds generally being more used to being bent over a table with a long cue near them they’d be at an advantage? Not exclusive to birds to be fair ....
The Kraken Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Google AI tells us that no woman has ever recorded a 147 in competition, and the following issues. I am surprised, I thought snooker would be as even as you could get. While snooker is not a physically demanding sport like rugby, male players hold advantages in height, reach, and cue power, allowing for better table access and cue ball control. Statistically, men dominate the sport due to a larger talent pool, better spatial awareness, and higher risks taken in play, whereas women often face lower participation rates and less competitive experience. Key Advantages for Males: Height & Reach: Being generally taller allows men to reach shots more easily, reducing the need for the rest (a technical aid) which is less accurate than a natural bridge. Cue Power: Males typically possess more power, which is beneficial for break-building and controlling the cue ball on a large 12-foot table. Physical Strength & Stability: Larger hands and stronger fingers allow for a more stable bridge, especially in awkward positions. Spatial Skills & Risk-Taking: Studies suggest males often have better spatial perception, which helps in calculating complex angles, and they are generally more likely to take aggressive, high-risk shots. Participation & Structure: The sport has historically been dominated by men, offering higher levels of competition, more experience, and greater opportunities for development. Female Perspective: Skill, Not Power: Top female players have demonstrated that skill can compensate for power, though they may face challenges in endurance over long, high-stakes matches. Sociological Barriers: Often, the lack of women in top-tier snooker is cited as a problem of participation, lack of opportunities, and cultural perceptions rather than purely physiological differences. Edited 2 hours ago by The Kraken
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now