Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Are the RNLI volunteers "Traitors" ?

What are you going on about? @tdmickey3is and abusive little lapdog that was my point. He lacks education, class and runs around liking all of his masters posts and trying to back them up with (if we are lucky) three word comments. Embarrassing 

Edited by Sir Ralph
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, rallyboy said:

Now they're frightened because a cricket team has been seen in Portsmouth.

Absolute clowns.

Whether they are doing this the right way or not, they are getting a lot of attention on the particular issue. Main story on sky, the bbc, politicians commenting about them and this forum.

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

What are you going on about? @tdmickey3is and abusive little lapdog that was my point. He lacks education, class and runs around liking all of his masters posts and trying to back them up with (if we are lucky) three word comments. Embarrassing 

As you are so fond of demanding of others, answer the question.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, badgerx16 said:

As you are eo fond of demanding of others, answer the question.

Unfortunately he's nowhere near as clever as he thinks he is. It's why he comes on here, throws some links to right wing click bait, and then can't answer anything posed which is outside of the article.

  • Like 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

As you are so fond of demanding of others, answer the question.

You sound like my wife. Do it now! I don’t like what they have done but they are obligated so they aren’t traitors. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, benjii said:

I don't think that is correct. Got a link to the figures?

Of course he hasn't. He read that rage bait headline somewhere and repeated it as fact because it fits his narrative, and will ignore/refuse any requests to substantiate it.

He has form for this.

Edited by Sheaf Saint
  • Like 3
Posted
10 hours ago, Osvaldorama said:


After world war 2, any French woman that slept with a German soldier had her head shaved and was made an outcast. 
 

Most people tend to get annoyed at those inviting violent thugs into their country. It’s quite a natural response. 

You fucking vile cunt.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, benjii said:

I don't think that is correct. Got a link to the figures?

Fuck off with facts, Rupert says so.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Osvaldorama said:


After world war 2, any French woman that slept with a German soldier had her head shaved and was made an outcast. 
 

Most people tend to get annoyed at those inviting violent thugs into their country. It’s quite a natural response. 

You could just imagine this cunt flailing in the water and RNLI volunteers save him and he wouldn’t even be gracious enough to thank them. Although doubt he’d do anything as adventurous as get off the internet in his little scared angry world. Most exciting thing that that happened this week was he ordered a balaclava online. 

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, whelk said:

You could just imagine this cunt flailing in the water and RNLI volunteers save him and he wouldn’t even be gracious enough to thank them. Although doubt he’d do anything as adventurous as get off the internet in his little scared angry world. Most exciting thing that that happened this week was he ordered a balaclava online. 

This is him i think

single man using computer in untidy bedsit Stock Photo - Alamy

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, whelk said:

You could just imagine this cunt flailing in the water and RNLI volunteers save him and he wouldn’t even be gracious enough to thank them. Although doubt he’d do anything as adventurous as get off the internet in his little scared angry world. Most exciting thing that that happened this week was he ordered a balaclava online. 

 

The point is you, or anyone else, don’t know what % of these arrivals are criminals and will go on to harm people. 
 

They could be murderers/rapists/terrorists. Most probably aren’t. But you can’t say for sure. 
 

and that makes the RNLI (and government) traitors in my view. 

Edited by Osvaldorama
  • Haha 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

 

The point is you, or anyone else, don’t know what % of these arrivals are criminals and will go on to harm people. 
 

They could be murderers/rapists/terrorists. Most probably aren’t. But you can’t say for sure. 
 

and that makes the RNLI (and government) traitors in my view. 

So your solution is to kill them as they enter, is that it?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

 

The point is you, or anyone else, don’t know what % of these arrivals are criminals and will go on to harm people. 
 

 

True. However, the same applies to ANY group of people, regardless of their ethnicity or immigration status.

But you would have to have the IQ of a fucking potato to think that is in any way a valid reason to condone attacks on volunteer public servants.

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

So your solution is to kill them as they enter, is that it?

Hadn’t actually seen his original post calling RNLI volunteers traitors until you copied it there.

Wow. Wow. As @CB Fry would say, Jesus Wept. That’s equally as abysmal as the Soggy post about Huw Edwards. 

Here’s a little friend from Hayling Island for him to sit with in the Fratton End https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/danny-tommo-thomas-patriot-platform-portsmouth-b3046032.html

Just imagine the conversations during the match - planning upcoming marches in balaclavas, counting how many wing mirrors they kicked off along Goldsmith Ave, racist jokes from the 1980s, where serves the coldest Carling in Commercial St and sharing emojis about lynching black people in the Deep South, assuming that shithole has Wi-Fi. They’ll both need a nose peg if Westwood is in the vicinity.

Edited by Gloucester Saint
  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

True. However, the same applies to ANY group of people, regardless of their ethnicity or immigration status.

But you would have to have the IQ of a fucking potato to think that is in any way a valid reason to condone attacks on volunteer public servants.

@Farmer Saint will take offence at that on behalf of his potato crop.

  • Haha 5
Posted
20 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


You’ve lost it mate. What on earth are you on about 😂

Well what are you doing with them? Yesterday you were saying to sink them in the channel. Is that still your plan?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

True. However, the same applies to ANY group of people, regardless of their ethnicity or immigration status.

But you would have to have the IQ of a fucking potato to think that is in any way a valid reason to condone attacks on volunteer public servants.

You nailed it there, despicable excuse for a person 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Hadn’t actually seen his original post calling RNLI volunteers traitors until you copied it there.

Wow. Wow. As @CB Fry would say, Jesus Wept. That’s equally as abysmal as the Soggy post about Huw Edwards. 

Here’s a little friend from Hayling Island for him to sit with in the Fratton End https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/news/danny-tommo-thomas-patriot-platform-portsmouth-b3046032.html

Just imagine the conversations during the match - planning upcoming marches in balaclavas, counting how many wing mirrors they kicked off along Goldsmith Ave, racist jokes from the 1980s, where serves the coldest Carling in Commercial St and sharing emojis about lynching black people in the Deep South. They’ll both need a nose peg if Westwood is in the vicinity.

He's pure scum. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Madgwick was on the lunchtime news calling for people to be careful of their behaviour when tensions are high.

Any idea why tensions might be high George?

Reform are essentially just a slightly more articulate version of Danny Thommo, Tommy Robinson. Farage tries to make them distinct to keep a distance from his own turds.

Wonder if Osv was there?

Edited by Gloucester Saint
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

True. However, the same applies to ANY group of people, regardless of their ethnicity or immigration status.

But you would have to have the IQ of a fucking potato to think that is in any way a valid reason to condone attacks on volunteer public servants.


And you’d have to have the IQ of a spoon to think they were attacked. 
 

There was a peaceful protest, with zero arrests. 
 

Also, the % of bad actors in a group that crosses the channel illegally is likely to be far higher than in a random sample of the general population. 

So you’re actually helping my argument 

Edited by Osvaldorama
Posted
2 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


And you’d have to have the IQ of a spoon to think they were attacked. 
 

There was a peaceful protest, with zero arrests 

There wasn't a physical attack on the RNLI folk. Correct. However, there were threats and unnecessary comments of traitor etc. 

The protest was not peaceful. People do not get injured, and items damaged, in peaceful protests. Sure, it wasn't a riot, but don't kid yourself it was peaceful. 

  • Like 3
  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, egg said:

There wasn't a physical attack on the RNLI folk. Correct. However, there were threats and unnecessary comments of traitor etc. 

The protest was not peaceful. People do not get injured, and items damaged, in peaceful protests. Sure, it wasn't a riot, but don't kid yourself it was peaceful. 

And Ossie’s mates are anything but peaceful - and I don’t want the migrant small boats any more than he or you do.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jul/24/most-people-arrested-during-henry-nowak-protests-had-been-reported-for-domestic-abuse

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c70y84066gko

https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/26523531.henry-nowak-protestor-jailed-smuggling-500k-cannabis/

Posted
7 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

Shock, losing the debate so resorting to insults. 
 

Typical lefty’s 

What debate is that? You've not replied to my question.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


And you’d have to have the IQ of a spoon to think they were attacked. 
 

There was a peaceful protest, with zero arrests.   DUH! 🤡
 

Also, the % of bad actors in a group that crosses the channel illegally is likely to be far higher than in a random sample of the general population. 

So you’re actually helping my argument 

Hundreds of protesters gathered in Portsmouth after a boat carrying about 140 migrants was brought ashore in Hampshire.

Demonstrators blocked roads in an attempt to stop coaches carrying the migrants from leaving the city on Sunday night, following a separate protest at the Port of Dover the previous day.

Hampshire Police said a small number of officers were injured and vehicles were damaged, with an investigation now under way to identify those responsible.

The government said people had a right to peaceful protest but condemned "intimidating and thuggish behaviour" at the demonstration.

Edited by tdmickey3
  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, egg said:

There wasn't a physical attack on the RNLI folk. Correct. However, there were threats and unnecessary comments of traitor etc. 

The protest was not peaceful. People do not get injured, and items damaged, in peaceful protests. Sure, it wasn't a riot, but don't kid yourself it was peaceful. 


So it was a peaceful protest, with zero arrests, yet you want to pretend it wasn’t peaceful. Got it. 😂😂🤡

Edited by Osvaldorama
Posted
9 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


So it was a peaceful protest, with zero arrests, yet you want to pretend it wasn’t peaceful. Got it. 😂😂🤡

More much more peaceful than many other 'largely peaceful' protests and "carnivals"...?

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


So it was a peaceful protest, with zero arrests, yet you want to pretend it wasn’t peaceful. Got it. 😂😂🤡

Which bit of "Officers were injured and vehicles were damaged" do you not understand?

  • Like 1
Posted

It seems to be that if the BBC’s tone decides how people feel about protests, more than the data 

 

9 arrests at the last pro-Palestine March. I bet that was mostly peaceful though? 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


So it was a peaceful protest, with zero arrests, yet you want to pretend it wasn’t peaceful. Got it. 😂😂🤡

See the post above yours. Your moral compass is more skewed than I thought if you regard a protest where people get injured, and items damaged, as peaceful.

By your metric, if you popped down the local and people come in, cause damage, and hurt people, it'd have been a nice peaceful night unless someone got arrested. By a normal person's standards, however, that ain't peaceful. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Osvaldorama said:

It seems to be that if the BBC’s tone decides how people feel about protests, more than the data 

 

9 arrests at the last pro-Palestine March. I bet that was mostly peaceful though? 

12898475932 incidents at the 'carnival'.....but that is wonderful

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, egg said:

See the post above yours. Your moral compass is more skewed than I thought if you regard a protest where people get injured, and items damaged, as peaceful.

By your metric, if you popped down the local and people come in, cause damage, and hurt people, it'd have been a nice peaceful night unless someone got arrested. By a normal person's standards, however, that ain't peaceful. 


The state & their mainstream media are DESPERATE to paint it as thuggery. 
 

But there is zero proof. Zero arrests. Zero evidence of any wrongdoing. Just people making their voices heard after being ignored for a decade. 

Edited by Osvaldorama
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


And you’d have to have the IQ of a spoon to think they were attacked.  

You do realise that the word "attack" has many meanings and doesn't necessarily imply physical violence, right?

Naming and shaming someone who risks their life to save others, and branding them as traitors or treasonous, is quite obviously an attack. 

49 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

Also, the % of bad actors in a group that crosses the channel illegally is likely to be far higher than in a random sample of the general population. 

What's your evidence for this? 

Edited by Sheaf Saint
  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Osvaldorama said:


The state & their mainstream media are DESPERATE to paint it as thuggery. 
 

But there is zero proof. Zero arrest. Zero evidence of any wrongdoing.

Are you seriously suggesting that without an arrest, a protest where things get damaged and people hurt, must be described as "peaceful"? What makes it not peaceful, an arrest? 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

Hundreds of protesters gathered in Portsmouth after a boat carrying about 140 migrants was brought ashore in Hampshire.

Demonstrators blocked roads in an attempt to stop coaches carrying the migrants from leaving the city on Sunday night, following a separate protest at the Port of Dover the previous day.

Hampshire Police said a small number of officers were injured and vehicles were damaged, with an investigation now under way to identify those responsible.

The government said people had a right to peaceful protest but condemned "intimidating and thuggish behaviour" at the demonstration.

Irrelevant mate, no arrests, so it was basically a tea party. Or something. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

Just people making their voices heard after being ignored for a decade. 

"I DEMAND TO HAVE MY VOICE HEARD"...

...says man in balaclava who didn't want to be named.

  • Haha 3
Posted
Just now, egg said:

Are you seriously suggesting that without an arrest, a protest where things get damaged and people hurt, must be described as "peaceful"? What makes it not peaceful, an arrest? 

 

There haven’t been arrests yet.

Plenty were arrested after the Nowak riot, several were returned to their natural habitat, the prison. 

Sending threats of violence and intimidation to RNLI volunteers is a criminal offence and the cops won’t take kindly to it. Plenty of dawn door knocks to come.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

From that BBC report ;

Neil, whose face was visible in the video, told BBC Verify that the RNLI vessel was in the area to illuminate the beach "purely for the safety of the protesters who had entered the sea."

Fucking traitors!

No wait, they were helping the protesters. That means they're good again, right?

Hold on, this is complicated. Maybe Osvald Harvey knows the truth?

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said:

Shock, losing the debate so resorting to insults. 
 

Aaaaand.....

1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said:

Typical lefty’s 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

"I DEMAND TO HAVE MY VOICE HEARD"...

...says man in balaclava who didn't want to be named.


And the organisers mum has had to go into hiding because the mainstream media doxxed her home address. 
 

Therefore proving that masks are necessary because the state is now far-left fascist. 

  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...