Solving the Immigration Problem

[Sir Ralph]

2 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

Typical response. Tells others to Google it whereas he calls you out for not providing links.

Here he is “mr I can’t answer any questions” - do you have the 5 replies to my questions. Where did I ever call him out for not sharing links? Question 6

I’ve given him the name of the report and there is only one government report with that name.  He wants me to be his secretary. I’m not stupid I know how his weird mind works it’s a sad attempt at a power play, which I won’t enter into.  Come back when you have the answers rather than hiding behind your friends

Edited 7 hours ago by Sir Ralph

[Sir Ralph]

1 hour ago, Weston Super Saint said:

The question you added in your edit after I quoted you?

Absolutely, yes.  That's exactly what Mrs WSS has done having gained ILR over 25 years ago.

You've previously mentioned you are a Reform supporter.  Do you agree that those that have integrated into society, paid their taxes, worked and not had a penny in benefits should have their ILR cancelled?

I can’t remember which bit I edited - I was probably trying to ensure accuracy. I’m not a reform supporter as such Iprobably more of a conservative.

Eveb if I did vote for them doesn’t mean I agree with every policy. ILR shouldn’t be cancelled in cases such as your wife on the assumption she has contributed to British society through working and taxes and isn’t a criminal (I’m not making a disparaging comment I’m just stating some criteria which could void ILR)

Edited 7 hours ago by Sir Ralph

[Farmer Saint]

7 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Here he is “mr I can’t answer any questions” - do you have the 5 replies to my questions. I’ve given him the name of the report and there is only one government report with that name.  He wants me to be his secretary. I’m not stupid I know how his weird mind works it’s a sad attempt at a power play, which I won’t enter into.  Come back when you have the answers rather than hiding behind your friends

You haven't given me the name - you just said Home Affairs Select Committee. That's just a site. Why won't you just send me the link? There is no power play here, you have quoted statistics based on something you've read, yet you won't post the site. Just asking you to post where you got them from.

Have you read the articles/reports I sent?

[tdmickey3]

13 hours ago, Osvaldorama said:

Your mums a dad and your dads a dinner lady

Your dad should have used contraception 

[JohnnyShearer2.0]

47 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Here he is “mr I can’t answer any questions” - do you have the 5 replies to my questions. Where did I ever call him out for not sharing links? Question 6

I’ve given him the name of the report and there is only one government report with that name.  He wants me to be his secretary. I’m not stupid I know how his weird mind works it’s a sad attempt at a power play, which I won’t enter into.  Come back when you have the answers rather than hiding behind your friends

Hahahaha.

You really are a condescending smeghead. 

All questions answered. Not my issue if you're too lazy to go back and see.

[AlexLaw76]

1 hour ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

Hahahaha.

You really are a condescending smeghead. 

All questions answered. Not my issue if you're too lazy to go back and see.

[hypochondriac]

5 hours ago, Farmer Saint said:

You've got to be some sort of moron to defend these planks.

I could even understand someone defending the general idea of what he is doing and still think he is a fucking idiot.

[Turkish]

Some of you lot need to go for a beer or a wank, maybe both

[AlexLaw76]

29 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Some of you lot need to go for a beer or a wank, maybe both

Pattaya?

[Gloucester Saint]

51 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Some of you lot need to go for a beer or a wank, maybe both

Sank a bottle of Perla - wonderful Polish Pils - whilst watching Cheltenham beat Chesterfield 2-1 in a highly entertaining contest.

Great to watch two sides going at it at a consistently high tempo unlike the plodding sideways shit beloved of SR.

Finn Azaz was on loan there a few years ago and still remembered fondly by the Robins faithful.

I see Harrogate whacked Beastleigh 4-1. Carlisle 5th from bottom - Rob Elliott still a crap manager. Sacked Mark Hughes after 93 points and appointed that plum instead. 

Edited 2 hours ago by Gloucester Saint
Contest, not context

[Turkish]

31 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Pattaya?

Might even find a new wife

[Turkish]

14 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Sank a bottle of Perla - wonderful Polish Pils - whilst watching Cheltenham beat Chesterfield 2-1 in a highly entertaining contest.

Great to watch two sides going at it at a consistently high tempo unlike the plodding sideways shit beloved of SR.

Finn Azaz was on loan there a few years ago and still remembered fondly by the Robins faithful.

Did you knock one out in the toilet?

[Gloucester Saint]

37 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Did you knock one out in the toilet?

More likely to fall asleep after drinking Perla 😂

[JohnnyShearer2.0]

2 hours ago, Turkish said:

Some of you lot need to go for a beer or a wank, maybe both

Wankbeer or beerwank?

 

[Turkish]

2 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Sank a bottle of Perla - wonderful Polish Pils - whilst watching Cheltenham beat Chesterfield 2-1 in a highly entertaining contest.

Great to watch two sides going at it at a consistently high tempo unlike the plodding sideways shit beloved of SR.

Finn Azaz was on loan there a few years ago and still remembered fondly by the Robins faithful.

I see Harrogate whacked Beastleigh 4-1. Carlisle 5th from bottom - Rob Elliott still a crap manager. Sacked Mark Hughes after 93 points and appointed that plum instead. 

Yes good win today back up to 4th I’d have liked to have gone today but missus has got a 100 quid M&S voucher so had to go to the big one in Leeds so she could spend all afternoon looking round that FFS. Don’t go much anymore as most of sons futsal games are on a Saturday and involves quite a bit of travelling to away games. 

[West end Saints]

21 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

We’re going round In circles. The figures show a huge difference - around 360 blm protests resulting in 135 arrests compared with 250 protests and 1,804 arrests for illegal migrant protests. The stats prove a significant and marked jump in arrests for lesser protests by illegal migrant protesters.

Youre justification is a perceived threat which means this radical jump in arrests is justified. I don’t think your explanation gets close to covering it. Hence why the police are being accused of being two tier.
 

I think those stats are misleading.

The BLM protests were generally peaceful, and over a short period - the arrests reflect the exceptions, and of course, when sudden outbursts in large protests could have been higher.

The illegal immigrant protests have been over longer periods, involved organised riots, setting fire to hotels, looting shops, and attacking mosques over sustained periods. Over 100 officers injured. 

There are people who will always join in for violent sport, get too agitated etc, across the spectrum however the nature of the EFL led right wing protests is violent criminals ( Tommy and Tommo) stoking crowds to make money.

Police and courts have a long history of right wing bias.

 

Edited just now by West end Saints